Habilidades same-idea-both-platforms
📦

same-idea-both-platforms

Revisão do conteúdo r1 Seguro ⚙️ Comandos externos

Turn One Idea into Twitter and LinkedIn Posts

Identical posts often lack the structure each platform expects. This skill writes separate Twitter and LinkedIn drafts from one idea and explains their differences.

Suporta: Claude Codex Code(CC)
🥉 77 Bronze

Instalar com meu Agente

Copie esta solicitação para o seu Agente. Ela inclui a página canônica do Skill e o manifesto.

Solicitação do agente
Review the Skillstore skill "same-idea-both-platforms" from https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Seu Agente ainda deve apresentar o plano e solicitar qualquer confirmação exigida pela política de segurança.

Recursos legíveis por agentes

Use estes links quando um agente de IA, crawler ou script precisar de contexto limpo em vez de ler a página completa.

Detalhe em Markdown GET /skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms.md manifest assinado GET /api/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/manifest lockfile assinado GET /api/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/lockfile

Testar

Usando "same-idea-both-platforms". Create Twitter and LinkedIn posts about testing a signup form before rebuilding the whole website.

Resultado esperado:

  • Core idea: Test the signup form before committing to a full website rebuild.
  • Twitter: Before rebuilding your website, test the signup form. A smaller experiment can tell you where the real problem is.
  • LinkedIn: A website redesign is a large commitment. Testing the signup form first can reveal whether the problem needs a smaller change.
  • Difference: Twitter leads with the recommendation; LinkedIn introduces the decision and its context.

Usando "same-idea-both-platforms". Write both posts about recording the reasons behind team decisions.

Resultado esperado:

  • Core idea: Record why a team made a decision, not just what it decided.
  • Twitter: A decision log needs the reason, not just the result. Future teammates will need to understand what you were solving.
  • LinkedIn: When a team records a decision, the outcome is only part of the story. Include the constraints and alternatives behind it. That context helps future teammates understand the choice before revisiting it.
  • Difference: Twitter compresses the lesson; LinkedIn adds practical context and separates the supporting points.

Auditoria de segurança

Seguro
v1 • 02/10/2026 Abrir o relatório versionado

All three static detections are false positives caused by Markdown backticks around tool names, not Ruby or shell execution. No evidence found of prompt injection, credential theft, or data exfiltration in SKILL.md. The optional VoiceMOAT workflow describes separate previews and explicit approvals for each post.

1
Arquivos analisados
68
Linhas analisadas
0
Itens de revisão
0
Falsos positivos ignorados

Fatores de risco

⚙️ Comandos externos (3)
SKILL.md:58 SKILL.md:61 SKILL.md:63
A auditoria estática e semântica concluída mais recente não detectou achados de segurança confirmados. Isso não comprova que a skill não tenha efeitos colaterais.
Auditado por: codex
Compartilhar e citar este relatório

Compartilhe o relatório de avaliação versionado, o badge neutro, o cartão incorporável e as citações. A Skillstore apresenta evidências sem decidir se este Skill é seguro.

Abrir o relatório versionado
Avaliação de Segurança

Copiar link do relatório

https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Badge Markdown

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

Badge HTML

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Cartão incorporável

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
Citações acadêmicas (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

Citação APA

prateeks367. (2026). same-idea-both-platforms security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/audits/1

Citação BibTeX

@techreport{prateeks367-prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms-2026, author = {prateeks367}, title = {same-idea-both-platforms security audit report (audit version 1)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {1}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/audits/1}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "same-idea-both-platforms security audit report (audit version 1)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "prateeks367" date-released: "2026-10-02" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/audits/1" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms:audit:1" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Pontuação do Skillstore

Por que esta pontuação Confiança das evidências: Médio
55
Arquitetura
85
Manutenibilidade
87
Conteúdo
65
Comunidade
83
Conformidade com a especificação

O que você pode criar

Share a product lesson

Turn one product lesson into a concise Twitter statement and a contextual LinkedIn post.

Explain a technical insight

Present a technical insight differently for Twitter readers and LinkedIn professionals without changing the central claim.

Prepare paired client drafts

Create distinct drafts for both platforms and explain the structural choices during client review.

Teste estes prompts

Draft a simple post pair 
Write separate Twitter and LinkedIn posts about [idea]. State the core idea first, then give both drafts and one sentence explaining their differences.
Extract an idea from existing text 
Use [source text] to identify one core idea. Ask for clarification if needed, then write independent Twitter and LinkedIn drafts and explain the differences.
Review and rewrite a post pair 
Review [Twitter draft] and [LinkedIn draft] for misplaced platform phrasing and repeated sentences. Rewrite both from their shared idea and explain the structural changes.
Use connected platform profiles 
With VoiceMOAT connected, draft both posts about [idea] using each platform profile and score each draft. Preview separately; request approval before scheduling each.

Boas práticas

  • Confirm the central idea in plain language before writing either post.
  • Write each draft independently and check for phrasing that belongs to the other platform.
  • Review both drafts for accuracy and approve each post separately when using connected publishing tools.

Evitar

  • Copying identical wording to both platforms and changing only the length.
  • Drafting from an unclear paragraph without identifying its main point.
  • Treating approval for one platform as permission to publish on both.

Perguntas frequentes

What does this skill produce?
It produces a core idea, separate Twitter and LinkedIn drafts, and a short explanation of the differences.
Can I provide an existing post?
Yes. The skill extracts the underlying idea and writes both versions independently instead of copying the original wording.
Can I use it for only one platform?
That is outside its intended scope. The workflow is designed to produce both Twitter and LinkedIn posts.
Do I need VoiceMOAT to draft posts?
No. The core drafting workflow works without VoiceMOAT; platform profiles, scoring, publishing, and scheduling depend on the connector.
What does the VoiceMOAT connector require?
The skill states that the connector requires a VoiceMOAT Pro or Enterprise plan.
Will both posts publish automatically?
No. The connected workflow specifies a separate preview and one-time confirmation for each post.

Detalhes do desenvolvedor

Licença

MIT

Revisão da Skillstore

r1

Aviso de versão

O autor não declarou uma versão.

Repositório

https://github.com/prateeks367/voicemoat-skills/tree/b1749d2bf583cf8c78baf246f6007522e8c052a2/skills/same-idea-both-platforms

Referência

5726d703fd79596f46a4232d911221f962d9af1d

Atualidade da manutenção

02/10/2026

Uso

0 downloads · 0 visualizações

Estrutura de arquivos

📄 SKILL.md