Habilidades gpt-series-reasoning-style
📦

gpt-series-reasoning-style

v1.6.0 Revisão do conteúdo r6 Seguro 🌐 Acesso à rede📁 Acesso ao sistema de arquivos⚙️ Comandos externos

Verify AI Deliverables with Evidence

AI work can appear complete before the result is opened, tested, or checked against the request. This skill adds staged planning, real-environment verification, and honest completion levels.

Suporta: Claude Codex Code(CC)
💎 90 Em Destaque

Instalar com meu Agente

Copie esta solicitação para o seu Agente. Ela inclui a página canônica do Skill e o manifesto.

Solicitação do agente
Review the Skillstore skill "gpt-series-reasoning-style" from https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Seu Agente ainda deve apresentar o plano e solicitar qualquer confirmação exigida pela política de segurança.

Testar

Usando "gpt-series-reasoning-style". Build a small dashboard and tell me when it is finished.

Resultado esperado:

The dashboard is implemented. I opened it in the target environment, checked the main interaction, and verified the displayed totals. Mobile layout and external data refresh remain unverified.

Usando "gpt-series-reasoning-style". Have two agents research and implement this feature.

Resultado esperado:

  • Research agent: documented assumptions and acceptance checks.
  • Implementation agent: completed the feature and supplied the changed files.
  • Review: opened the integrated result and checked the critical path.
  • Status: C1 verified; stakeholder approval is still required for C2.

Usando "gpt-series-reasoning-style". Confirm that this report is correct.

Resultado esperado:

The report matches the requested structure and its key figures were recalculated. Source freshness and business acceptance were not independently verified.

Auditoria de segurança

Seguro

All 91 static findings were adjudicated as false positives because they reference public metadata, documentation, fixed repository paths, or analysis heuristics rather than executed behavior. No prompt-injection text, data-exfiltration intent, or runtime command execution was evidenced in the reviewed files.

24
Arquivos analisados
2,119
Linhas analisadas
0
Itens de revisão
0
Falsos positivos ignorados
A auditoria estática e semântica concluída mais recente não detectou achados de segurança confirmados. Isso não comprova que a skill não tenha efeitos colaterais.
Compartilhar e citar este relatório

Compartilhe o relatório de avaliação versionado, o badge neutro, o cartão incorporável e as citações. A Skillstore apresenta evidências sem decidir se este Skill é seguro.

Abrir o relatório versionado
Avaliação de Segurança

Copiar link do relatório

https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/audits/6?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Badge Markdown

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

Badge HTML

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Cartão incorporável

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
Citações acadêmicas (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

Citação APA

jadeyingwah. (2026). gpt-series-reasoning-style security audit report (audit version 6) [Author version 1.6.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/audits/6

Citação BibTeX

@techreport{jadeyingwah-jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style-2026, author = {jadeyingwah}, title = {gpt-series-reasoning-style security audit report (audit version 6)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {6}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/audits/6}, note = {Author version 1.6.0} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "gpt-series-reasoning-style security audit report (audit version 6)" version: "1.6.0" type: report authors: - name: "jadeyingwah" date-released: "2026-09-20" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/audits/6" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style:audit:6" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Pontuação do Skillstore

Por que esta pontuação Confiança das evidências: Médio
95
Arquitetura
100
Manutenibilidade
87
Conteúdo
65
Comunidade
91
Conformidade com a especificação

O que você pode criar

Review a Code Change

Ask an engineer or coding agent to implement a change, run focused checks, open the result, and report verified and unverified paths.

Coordinate Multiple Agents

Use staged planning and explicit handoffs when several agents divide research, implementation, testing, or review.

Validate a Client Deliverable

Track whether a document, design, or analysis matches the request and distinguish technical completion from stakeholder approval.

Teste estes prompts

Basic Completion Check
Complete this task, then open the actual result and list what you verified, what remains unverified, and whether the request is complete.
Plan Before Implementation
Plan this task in clear stages. Identify the required checks and the real environment where the final result must be opened before you implement it.
Audit a Finished Change
Review this completed change against the original request. Recalculate important numbers, open the output, test the critical path, and mark every unverified claim.
Coordinate an Agent Team
Break this project into independent agent roles. Define handoff evidence, assign a reviewer, verify the integrated result in its real environment, and report the appropriate C1 or C2 status.

Boas práticas

  • Define the evidence required for completion before implementation begins.
  • Open and use the delivered result in the environment that matters.
  • State verified facts, unverified paths, and completion level separately.

Evitar

  • Do not declare completion from code inspection alone.
  • Do not treat a green check as proof that the guarded failure case works.
  • Do not label a result C2 without user or external confirmation.

Perguntas frequentes

What does this skill verify?
It verifies delivery evidence, real-environment use, critical checks, and honest reporting of remaining uncertainty.
Does it run tests automatically?
No. It guides the agent to choose and run relevant checks, but available tools and project tests determine execution.
What is C1?
C1 means the technical delivery was checked with available evidence, while some broader acceptance may remain open.
What is C2?
C2 means the product is satisfactory, which requires user or external confirmation rather than model judgment alone.
Can it coordinate multiple agents?
Yes. It supports role separation, explicit handoffs, review evidence, and integrated-result verification.
Which tools support it?
The skill declares support for Claude, Codex, and Claude Code, plus compatible clients that follow the same skill convention.

Detalhes do desenvolvedor

Licença

MIT

Versão do autor

v1.6.0

Revisão da Skillstore

r6

Referência

ca840d3e968d0e2f0cfde9943dd7e35a0878a763

Atualidade da manutenção

20/09/2026

Uso

3 downloads · 18 visualizações