Habilidades deep-research-framework
📦

deep-research-framework

Revisão do conteúdo r1 Seguro ⚙️ Comandos externos

Build Research Reports with Traceable Evidence

Research reports can hide weak sources, stale facts, and unsupported conclusions. This framework guides clear questions, independent verification, and conclusion-first writing with explicit uncertainty.

Suporta: Claude Codex Code(CC)
🥉 78 Bronze

Instalar com meu Agente

Copie esta solicitação para o seu Agente. Ela inclui a página canônica do Skill e o manifesto.

Solicitação do agente
Review the Skillstore skill "deep-research-framework" from https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Seu Agente ainda deve apresentar o plano e solicitar qualquer confirmação exigida pela política de segurança.

Recursos legíveis por agentes

Use estes links quando um agente de IA, crawler ou script precisar de contexto limpo em vez de ler a página completa.

Detalhe em Markdown GET /skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework.md manifest assinado GET /api/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/manifest lockfile assinado GET /api/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/lockfile

Testar

Usando "deep-research-framework". Outline research on whether our team should adopt a new documentation platform.

Resultado esperado:

  • Main question: Does the platform meet our documentation requirements?
  • Sub-questions: What features are documented? What migration work is required? What costs are supported by current evidence?
  • Primary sources: Official documentation, pricing pages, and measured trial results.
  • Uncertainty: Actual migration effort and independent corroboration remain unresolved.

Usando "deep-research-framework". Assess a vendor availability claim supported by one undated brochure.

Resultado esperado:

  • Conclusion: The vendor availability claim remains a single-source claim.
  • Evidence: Only one undated vendor brochure was supplied.
  • Verification gap: No independent measurements or dated supporting documents were provided.
  • Reassessment condition: Dated operational evidence and independent corroboration could change this conclusion.

Auditoria de segurança

Seguro
v1 • 06/10/2026 Abrir o relatório versionado

The static command-execution finding is a false positive: SKILL.md lines 34-51 contain a fenced Markdown report outline. No evidence found of executable commands, data exfiltration intent, or prompt injection in the reviewed skill.

1
Arquivos analisados
60
Linhas analisadas
0
Itens de revisão
0
Falsos positivos ignorados

Fatores de risco

⚙️ Comandos externos (1)
SKILL.md:34-51
A auditoria estática e semântica concluída mais recente não detectou achados de segurança confirmados. Isso não comprova que a skill não tenha efeitos colaterais.
Auditado por: codex
Compartilhar e citar este relatório

Compartilhe o relatório de avaliação versionado, o badge neutro, o cartão incorporável e as citações. A Skillstore apresenta evidências sem decidir se este Skill é seguro.

Abrir o relatório versionado
Avaliação de Segurança

Copiar link do relatório

https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Badge Markdown

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

Badge HTML

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Cartão incorporável

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
Citações acadêmicas (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

Citação APA

alapha888. (2026). deep-research-framework security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/audits/1

Citação BibTeX

@techreport{alapha888-alapha888-deep-research-framework-2026, author = {alapha888}, title = {deep-research-framework security audit report (audit version 1)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {1}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/audits/1}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "deep-research-framework security audit report (audit version 1)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "alapha888" date-released: "2026-10-06" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/audits/1" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:alapha888-deep-research-framework:audit:1" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Pontuação do Skillstore

Por que esta pontuação Confiança das evidências: Médio
55
Arquitetura
85
Manutenibilidade
87
Conteúdo
65
Comunidade
91
Conformidade com a especificação

O que você pode criar

Compare Competitors

Structure a competitor comparison around dated product evidence, independent corroboration, and gaps in available information.

Investigate a Technical Topic

Prioritize original papers and official documentation, then distinguish supported conclusions from speculation.

Prepare an Evidence-Based Brief

Organize a policy question into focused sections with traceable sources and explicit uncertainty.

Teste estes prompts

Start a Research Outline 
Create a research outline for [topic]. Define one main question, up to three sub-questions, source tiers, and an uncertainty section.
Review Source Quality 
Assess these sources for [question]: [sources]. Classify their tiers, check independence, flag undated facts, and identify claims that need corroboration.
Write a Comparative Report 
Compare [option A] and [option B] using [provided evidence]. Lead with conclusions, cite numerical claims, date facts, and mark single-source claims.
Audit Conclusions and Uncertainty 
Audit this report: [report and sources]. Check source independence, unsupported numbers, speculation, and stale facts. Revise conclusions and state what would invalidate them.

Boas práticas

  • Set the main question and source tiers before gathering information.
  • Check that corroborating sources do not repeat the same original source.
  • Date key facts and state missing evidence, speculation, and reassessment conditions.

Evitar

  • Treating social posts or forum discussions as evidence for core conclusions.
  • Presenting single-source claims, speculation, or undated facts as established current knowledge.
  • Listing sources without clear conclusions or hiding unresolved questions.

Perguntas frequentes

Does this skill search the web automatically?
It defines a research workflow but includes no search implementation. Browsing depends on the host assistant and available tools.
Which sources should support conclusions?
Use primary sources and reputable secondary sources. Treat social posts, forums, and aggregators as leads rather than evidence.
How many sources does a key conclusion need?
Use at least two independent sources. Multiple sources repeating one origin do not count as independent corroboration.
What happens when only one source exists?
Label the conclusion as a single-source claim and note that independent verification is missing.
How should outdated information be handled?
Date every key fact. Treat undated information as possibly stale and explain how newer evidence could change the conclusion.
What should the final report contain?
Include core conclusions, sections ordered by conclusion, evidence, and sources, plus an uncertainty statement covering missing evidence and reassessment conditions.

Detalhes do desenvolvedor

Autor

alapha888

Licença

MIT

Revisão da Skillstore

r1

Aviso de versão

O autor não declarou uma versão.

Repositório

https://github.com/alapha888/agent-skills-en/tree/f248342d20ae1e47ecfb146ea112a3e76234ff27/skills/deep-research-framework

Referência

9bbb9af75d2f5ea5acb8fac5aec75713670a067f

Atualidade da manutenção

06/10/2026

Uso

0 downloads · 0 visualizações

Estrutura de arquivos

📄 SKILL.md

Mais de alapha888

Ver tudo

Habilidades relacionadas

Ver tudo