un-editorial-check
Review Copy Against UN Editorial Rules
Editorial inconsistencies and sensitive wording are difficult to track across documents and websites. This skill checks extracted English copy and separates rule violations from human review.
Pare e solicite confirmação antes de instalar.
Revise o plano e obtenha o consentimento explícito do usuário antes de alterar arquivos.
Instalar com meu Agente
Copie esta solicitação para o seu Agente. Ela inclui a página canônica do Skill e o manifesto.
Review the Skillstore skill "un-editorial-check" from https://skillstore.io/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check/manifest. Verify the artifact. Stop and obtain explicit user consent before installing or changing files.Seu Agente ainda deve apresentar o plano e solicitar qualquer confirmação exigida pela política de segurança.
Recursos legíveis por agentes
Use estes links quando um agente de IA, crawler ou script precisar de contexto limpo em vez de ler a página completa.
Testar
Usando "un-editorial-check". Draft text: The color of the cover was noted.
Resultado esperado:
- Deterministic spelling finding: color.
- Suggested wording: colour.
- The checker reports the matching rule and source. The draft remains unchanged until an approved fix is applied.
Usando "un-editorial-check". An image-only PDF with no recoverable text.
Resultado esperado:
- Extraction refused: the document appears to contain scanned images without extractable text.
- The run returns exit code 2. The document is not reported as checked or clean.
Usando "un-editorial-check". A claim-register entry contains a source but no reference date.
Resultado esperado:
- Human review required: record the reference date for the registered claim.
- Register completeness does not establish that the claim is true.
Auditoria de segurança
Risco altoOf 400 supplied findings, 394 are false positives; six confirm unsafe baseline creation or blocking special-file reads, with additional PDF denial-of-service risk. No evidence found of prompt injection or intentional data exfiltration in reviewed context. Review was capped at 400 of 5,037 matches; the remaining 4,637 require manual review before automatic publication. Static review was capped at 400/5037 representative findings; omitted static matches are unconfirmed, so automatic publishing stays disabled until manual review.
Preocupações de segurança confirmadas (1)
Itens de revisão de capacidade (6)
Estas são capacidades locais reais que podem ser esperadas para esta habilidade, portanto exigem revisão, mas não são contabilizadas como comportamento malicioso confirmado.
Fatores de risco
⚙️ Comandos externos (50)
📁 Acesso ao sistema de arquivos (50)
🔑 Variáveis de ambiente (12)
🌐 Acesso à rede (50)
⚡ Contém scripts (50)
Compartilhar e citar este relatório
Compartilhe o relatório de avaliação versionado, o badge neutro, o cartão incorporável e as citações. A Skillstore apresenta evidências sem decidir se este Skill é seguro.
Copiar link do relatório
https://skillstore.io/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportBadge Markdown
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check?utm_source=security_passport_badge)Badge HTML
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Cartão incorporável
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Citações acadêmicas (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
Citação APA
ahaomar. (2026). un-editorial-check security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version 1.7.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check/audits/1Citação BibTeX
@techreport{ahaomar-ahaomar-un-editorial-check-2026,
author = {ahaomar},
title = {un-editorial-check security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check/audits/1},
note = {Author version 1.7.0}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "un-editorial-check security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "1.7.0"
type: report
authors:
- name: "ahaomar"
date-released: "2026-10-02"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/ahaomar-un-editorial-check/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:ahaomar-un-editorial-check:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Pontuação do Skillstore
Por que esta pontuação Confiança das evidências: MédioO que você pode criar
Review Institutional Publications
Check briefing papers for spelling, dates, terminology, and sensitive wording while preserving source references for editorial decisions.
Check Product Interface Copy
Review visible HTML and supported JavaScript copy before release, with optional publishing or accessibility findings reported separately.
Track Evidence Review
Create a claim register for detected figures and comparisons, then check source and reference-date completeness after human review.
Teste estes prompts
Review [draft.md] with un-editorial-check. Report deterministic violations separately from findings requiring human review. Do not modify the file.
Check [document.pdf] and write an HTML review report to [report.html]. Preserve rule sources and PDF page references. State extraction refusals clearly.
Show the target files in [content-directory]. Preview deterministic fixes for eligible prose files. Request approval before applying changes, then review the resulting diff.
Check [content-directory] using [organization-profile.json] and [claims.json]. Compare [baseline.json] and export SARIF. Keep optional audit findings separate from editorial failures.
Boas práticas
- Keep rule sources, confidence labels, and human-review recommendations attached to each finding.
- Show target files and preview corrections before approving writes; review every resulting diff.
- Use isolated, resource-limited processing for untrusted documents and review every extraction refusal.
Evitar
- Treating a clean run as factual verification, legal clearance, or United Nations approval.
- Automatically rewriting sensitive terminology, claims, or diplomatic language from heuristic findings.
- Using watch mode in CI or relying on optional audit findings to determine the process exit code.
Perguntas frequentes
Which assistants can use this skill?
Does it verify facts or provide United Nations approval?
Which files can it review?
Will it rewrite my documents automatically?
Does it retrieve pages or upload my documents?
What do exit codes mean?
Detalhes do desenvolvedor
Autor
ahaomarLicença
MIT
Versão do autor
v1.7.0
Revisão da Skillstore
r1
Repositório
https://github.com/ahaomar/un-editorial-check/tree/376d68d3408673fe1f4a30bb53d82f4eba36cc64/Referência
03d5e23fbf7bb87a093ed68c17ce9b3dd9b9934b
Atualidade da manutenção
02/10/2026
Uso
0 downloads · 0 visualizações
Estrutura de arquivos
📁 .github/
📄 ci.yml
📁 action/
📄 main.mjs
📁 agents/
📁 bin/
📁 config/
📄 generic-british-english.json
📁 docs/
📁 assets/
📄 un-editorial-check-banner.jpeg
📁 demo/
📁 fonts/
📁 lib/
📄 cli.mjs
📄 fix.mjs
📄 html.mjs
📄 init.mjs
📄 pdf.mjs
📄 ttf.mjs
📄 LICENSE
📁 rules/
📁 scripts/
📄 SKILL.md
📄 codex.md
📁 social/
📁 tests/
📁 audits/
📁 demo/
📁 fix/
📁 lanes/
📄 web-p0-incoherent-insertion.html
📄 mixed.js
📄 re002.js
📁 lib/
📄 run.mjs
📄 ttf.mjs
📄 VERSION