Historique des audits

All static findings are documentation false positives in Markdown tables, sample directory trees, setup notes, or environment variable placeholder lists. No evidence was found for prompt injection, credential exfiltration, hidden network calls, or actual command execution in the cited files. The author should clarify consent around dependency installation and real secret handling in generated projects.

All static findings were documentation false positives in Markdown tables, sample directory trees, setup notes, or environment variable placeholder lists. No evidence found for prompt injection, credential exfiltration, hidden network calls, or actual command execution in the cited files. The author should still clarify consent around dependency installation and real secret handling in generated projects.

All 18 static findings are false positives from Markdown documentation, tables, or scaffold examples. The reviewed files contain no prompt injection attempt, credential exfiltration intent, executable command path, or suspicious network behavior.

Static analysis reported 60 issues, but review found the command, weak-crypto, network, and environment hits are Markdown examples, filenames, or ordinary prose. No prompt injection, credential exfiltration, obfuscated code, or executable payloads were found in the reviewed files. The skill remains medium risk because it requests broad Bash, Write, Edit, and Agent capabilities for application generation.

Static analyzer flagged 195 patterns but all are false positives. The skill consists of Markdown documentation files, not executable code. Backtick patterns are Markdown code fences for displaying examples, not shell execution. Environment variable references document standard project structure. No malicious patterns detected. External commands risk factor retained because the skill instructs AI agents to run bash commands for project scaffolding and dependency installation.