์Šคํ‚ฌ better-interface
๐Ÿ“ฆ

better-interface

์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ  ๋ฆฌ๋น„์ „ r1 ์•ˆ์ „ โš™๏ธ ์™ธ๋ถ€ ๋ช…๋ น์–ด

Review Interfaces Across Six Design Disciplines

Separate interface reviews can duplicate issues and obscure the most important fixes. This skill coordinates specialist reviews into one evidence-based report ranked by user impact.

์ง€์›: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Maintain this Skill? Claim it ๐Ÿฅ‰ 77 ๋ธŒ๋ก ์ฆˆ

๋‚ด ์—์ด์ „ํŠธ๋กœ ์„ค์น˜

์ด ์š”์ฒญ์„ ์—์ด์ „ํŠธ์— ๋ณต์‚ฌํ•˜์„ธ์š”. ๊ณต์‹ Skill ํŽ˜์ด์ง€์™€ ๋งค๋‹ˆํŽ˜์ŠคํŠธ๊ฐ€ ํฌํ•จ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์—์ด์ „ํŠธ ์š”์ฒญ
Review the Skillstore skill "better-interface" from https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

์—์ด์ „ํŠธ๋Š” ๊ณ„์†ํ•ด์„œ ๊ณ„ํš์„ ํ‘œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ณด์•ˆ ์ •์ฑ…์—์„œ ์š”๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ํ™•์ธ์„ ์š”์ฒญํ•ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์—์ด์ „ํŠธ๊ฐ€ ์ฝ๊ธฐ ์‰ฌ์šด ๋ฆฌ์†Œ์Šค

AI ์—์ด์ „ํŠธ, ํฌ๋กค๋Ÿฌ, ์Šคํฌ๋ฆฝํŠธ๊ฐ€ ์ „์ฒด ํŽ˜์ด์ง€ ๋Œ€์‹  ์ •๋ฆฌ๋œ ์ปจํ…์ŠคํŠธ๋งŒ ํ•„์š”ํ•  ๋•Œ ์ด ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์„ธ์š”.

ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ•ด ๋ณด๊ธฐ

"better-interface" ์‚ฌ์šฉ ์ค‘์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Illustrative request: review a settings screen where rendered testing confirms the close control has no accessible name.

์˜ˆ์ƒ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ:

  • Scope: settings screen and its close control.
  • HIGH, Accessibility: the close control has no accessible name. Add a name that describes its action.
  • Verification: rendered accessibility inspection confirms the missing name.
  • Verdict: Block until the high-impact finding is resolved; name any unreviewed domains.

"better-interface" ์‚ฌ์šฉ ์ค‘์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Illustrative request: summarize a review with no actionable findings where the writing skill was unavailable.

์˜ˆ์ƒ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ:

  • Coverage: list the files, components, states, and checks inspected for each completed domain.
  • Writing: Not reviewed because better-writing was unavailable.
  • Findings: No actionable interface findings.
  • Verdict: Approve for inspected domains only. Writing was not reviewed.

๋ณด์•ˆ ๊ฐ์‚ฌ

์•ˆ์ „

All 25 static findings are false positives: 24 match Markdown code spans, and one matches prose about consolidating interface findings. No evidence found of malicious command execution, data exfiltration, or prompt injection in the supplied files. The skill requests safe project checks and specialist skill loading; those external implementations are outside this audit.

3
์Šค์บ”๋œ ํŒŒ์ผ
184
๋ถ„์„๋œ ์ค„ ์ˆ˜
0
๊ฒ€ํ†  ํ•ญ๋ชฉ
0
์˜คํƒ ๋ฌด์‹œ๋จ
๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ตœ๊ทผ์— ์™„๋ฃŒ๋œ ์ •์ ยท์˜๋ฏธ๋ก ์  ๊ฐ์‚ฌ์—์„œ ํ™•์ธ๋œ ๋ณด์•ˆ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ ์‚ฌํ•ญ์ด ๊ฐ์ง€๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์Šคํ‚ฌ์— ๋ถ€์ž‘์šฉ์ด ์—†์Œ์„ ์ฆ๋ช…ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
๊ฐ์‚ฌ์ž: codex
์ด ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ ๊ณต์œ  ๋ฐ ์ธ์šฉ

๋ฒ„์ „์ด ์ง€์ •๋œ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ, ์ค‘๋ฆฝ ๋ฐฐ์ง€, ์ž„๋ฒ ๋“œ ์นด๋“œ ๋ฐ ์ธ์šฉ์„ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜์„ธ์š”. Skillstore๋Š” ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ๋ฅผ ๋ณด๊ณ ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ด Skill์˜ ์•ˆ์ „ ์—ฌ๋ถ€๋ฅผ ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฒ„์ „๋ณ„ ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ ์—ด๊ธฐ
๋ณด์•ˆ ํ‰๊ฐ€

๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ ๋งํฌ ๋ณต์‚ฌ

https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown ๋ฐฐ์ง€

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML ๋ฐฐ์ง€

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

์ž„๋ฒ ๋“œ ์นด๋“œ

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
ํ•™์ˆ  ์ธ์šฉ (APA ยท BibTeX ยท CFF)

APA ์ธ์šฉ

jakubkrehel. (2026). better-interface security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface/audits/1

BibTeX ์ธ์šฉ

@techreport{jakubkrehel-jakubkrehel-better-interface-2026, author = {jakubkrehel}, title = {better-interface security audit report (audit version 1)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {1}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface/audits/1}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "better-interface security audit report (audit version 1)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "jakubkrehel" date-released: "2026-10-26" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface/audits/1" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:jakubkrehel-better-interface:audit:1" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore ์ ์ˆ˜

์ด ์ ์ˆ˜์˜ ์ด์œ  ์ฆ๊ฑฐ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„: ์ค‘๊ฐ„
55
์•„ํ‚คํ…์ฒ˜
85
์œ ์ง€๋ณด์ˆ˜์„ฑ
87
์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ 
65
์ปค๋ฎค๋‹ˆํ‹ฐ
83
์‚ฌ์–‘ ์ค€์ˆ˜

๋งŒ๋“ค ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ

Prioritize frontend fixes

Review a complete application flow and consolidate repeated component issues into actionable fixes ranked by user impact.

Check design consistency

Compare an implemented screen with project conventions across typography, color, layout, writing, and accessibility.

Assess release readiness

Review a critical user journey with explicit coverage, verification results, and a verdict based on remaining high-impact issues.

์ด ํ”„๋กฌํ”„ํŠธ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด ๋ณด์„ธ์š”

Review one screen
Review [screen] with better-interface. Keep the review read-only and return ranked findings, coverage, verification, and a verdict.
Review a complete flow
Review [flow] across all available domains. Include empty, loading, error, and narrow-width states, and state any excluded surfaces.
Investigate shared issues
Review [feature] using our documented design conventions. Consolidate repeated issues against shared tokens or components and prioritize the smallest effective fixes.
Review and implement fixes
Review [flow] and implement the consolidated findings within that scope. Use project-native solutions, rerun relevant checks, and report remaining issues and unverified behavior.

๋ชจ๋ฒ” ์‚ฌ๋ก€

  • Specify one complete screen or flow and provide the relevant project conventions.
  • Make specialist skills and a working preview available before requesting broad coverage.
  • Check the evidence, verification results, and unreviewed domains before relying on an approval.

ํ”ผํ•˜๊ธฐ

  • Treating missing specialist skills or unverified checks as proof that a domain passed.
  • Requesting repository-wide coverage when the available context supports only one complete flow.
  • Expecting source edits from a review request without explicitly authorizing implementation.

์ž์ฃผ ๋ฌป๋Š” ์งˆ๋ฌธ

Which AI tools are listed as supported?
The marketplace lists Claude, Codex, and Claude Code. Available checks and specialist skill loading depend on the host environment.
Does this package include all six specialist skills?
No. It references better-accessibility, better-layout, better-writing, better-typography, better-colors, and better-ui. Missing domains must be marked Not reviewed.
Will a review change my source files?
No, reviews are read-only by default. Source changes require an explicit implementation request.
Can it review a pull request directly?
It directs change-scoped requests to interface-review, which the user must invoke. It can consolidate a review handed back by that skill.
What does an Approve verdict mean?
No HIGH findings remain within inspected domains. MEDIUM and LOW findings may remain, and unreviewed domains must be named.
Does it guarantee accessibility compliance?
No. Results depend on specialist rules, inspected evidence, and available verification. Unavailable checks and unreviewed domains must be disclosed.

๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์ž ์„ธ๋ถ€ ์ •๋ณด

์ž‘์„ฑ์ž

jakubkrehel

๋ผ์ด์„ ์Šค

MIT

Skillstore ๋ฆฌ๋น„์ „

r1

๋ฒ„์ „ ์•ˆ๋‚ด

์ž‘์„ฑ์ž๊ฐ€ ๋ฒ„์ „์„ ์„ ์–ธํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ฐธ์กฐ

255b18dc04b3eaf08a8c32f2640d0a9c150aa2ed

์œ ์ง€๋ณด์ˆ˜ ์ตœ์‹ ์„ฑ

2026. 10. 26.

์‚ฌ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰

0 ๋‹ค์šด๋กœ๋“œ ยท 0 ์กฐํšŒ

ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ตฌ์กฐ

๐Ÿ“ agents/

๐Ÿ“„ openai.yaml

๐Ÿ“„ review-format.md

๐Ÿ“„ SKILL.md

jakubkrehel์˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์Šคํ‚ฌ

์ „์ฒด ๋ณด๊ธฐ
๐Ÿ“ฆ

make-interfaces-feel-better

78

์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค ์™„์„ฑ๋„ ๊ฐœ์„ 

์ž‘์€ UI ๋””ํ…Œ์ผ์€ ์™„์„ฑ๋œ ์ œํ’ˆ๋„ ์ข…์ข… ๊ฑฐ์น ๊ฒŒ ๋А๊ปด์ง€๊ฒŒ ๋งŒ๋“ญ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์Šคํ‚ฌ์€ Claude, Codex, Claude Code๊ฐ€ ํƒ€์ดํฌ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ผ, ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ, ๋ชจ์…˜, ์ธํ„ฐ๋ž™์…˜ ์™„์„ฑ๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜๋„๋ก ๋•์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋””์ž์ธ ๋ฐ ํฌ๋ฆฌ์—์ดํ‹ฐ๋ธŒ ๋ณด๊ธฐ
์ „์ฒด ๋ณด๊ธฐ
๐Ÿ“ฆ

ux-designer

80

๋ฆฌ์„œ์น˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋””์ž์ธ ๊ฐ€์ด๋“œ๋กœ UX ๊ฐœ์„ 

์ž‘์„ฑ์ž shubhamsaboo

ํŒ€์€ ์ข…์ข… ๊ฐ€์ •์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•ด ํ”Œ๋กœ์šฐ๋ฅผ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๋‹ค๊ฐ€ ์ ‘๊ทผ์„ฑ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๋†“์นฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์Šคํ‚ฌ์€ UX ๋ชจ๋ฒ” ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•ด ๋ฆฌ์„œ์น˜, ๊ตฌ์กฐ, ์ธํ„ฐ๋ž™์…˜ ๋””์ž์ธ, ๋ฆฌ๋ทฐ๋ฅผ ์•ˆ๋‚ดํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋””์ž์ธ ๋ฐ ํฌ๋ฆฌ์—์ดํ‹ฐ๋ธŒ ๋ณด๊ธฐ
๐Ÿ“ฆ

web-accessibility

82

WCAG ์ค€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์›น ์ ‘๊ทผ์„ฑ ๊ฐ์‚ฌ

์ž‘์„ฑ์ž 89jobrien

์ ‘๊ทผ์„ฑ ๊ฒฉ์ฐจ๋Š” ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋ฅผ ์ฐจ๋‹จํ•˜๊ณ  ์ค€์ˆ˜ ๋ฆฌ์Šคํฌ๋ฅผ ๋งŒ๋“ค ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์Šคํ‚ฌ์€ WCAG ๊ฐ์‚ฌ, ์Šคํฌ๋ฆฐ ๋ฆฌ๋” ์ ๊ฒ€, ํ‚ค๋ณด๋“œ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ, ๊ฐœ์„  ๊ณ„ํš ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝ์„ ์•ˆ๋‚ดํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋””์ž์ธ ๋ฐ ํฌ๋ฆฌ์—์ดํ‹ฐ๋ธŒ ๋ณด๊ธฐ
๐Ÿ“ฆ

frontend-design

81

๋…์ฐฝ์ ์ธ ํ”„๋ก ํŠธ์—”๋“œ ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค ์„ค๊ณ„

์ž‘์„ฑ์ž Atman36

์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์ƒ์„ฑํ˜• ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค๋Š” ์˜ˆ์ธก ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ณ  ์™„์„ฑ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ์•„ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์Šคํ‚ฌ์€ Claude, Codex, Claude Code๊ฐ€ ๋…์ฐฝ์ ์ด๊ณ  ํ”„๋กœ๋•์…˜ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ํ”„๋ก ํŠธ์—”๋“œ ๋””์ž์ธ์„ ๋งŒ๋“ค๋„๋ก ์•ˆ๋‚ดํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋””์ž์ธ ๋ฐ ํฌ๋ฆฌ์—์ดํ‹ฐ๋ธŒ ๋ณด๊ธฐ