gjalla-test-audit
Audit Test Suites for False Confidence
Weak tests can hide production bugs while inflating coverage metrics. This skill reviews test quality and identifies misleading, redundant, or excessively mocked tests.
๋ด ์์ด์ ํธ๋ก ์ค์น
์ด ์์ฒญ์ ์์ด์ ํธ์ ๋ณต์ฌํ์ธ์. ๊ณต์ Skill ํ์ด์ง์ ๋งค๋ํ์คํธ๊ฐ ํฌํจ๋์ด ์์ต๋๋ค.
Review the Skillstore skill "gjalla-test-audit" from https://skillstore.io/skills/gjalla-gjalla-test-audit.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/gjalla-gjalla-test-audit/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.์์ด์ ํธ๋ ๊ณ์ํด์ ๊ณํ์ ํ์ํ๊ณ ๋ณด์ ์ ์ฑ ์์ ์๊ตฌํ๋ ํ์ธ์ ์์ฒญํด์ผ ํฉ๋๋ค.
์์ด์ ํธ๊ฐ ์ฝ๊ธฐ ์ฌ์ด ๋ฆฌ์์ค
AI ์์ด์ ํธ, ํฌ๋กค๋ฌ, ์คํฌ๋ฆฝํธ๊ฐ ์ ์ฒด ํ์ด์ง ๋์ ์ ๋ฆฌ๋ ์ปจํ ์คํธ๋ง ํ์ํ ๋ ์ด ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ์ฌ์ฉํ์ธ์.
ํ ์คํธํด ๋ณด๊ธฐ
"gjalla-test-audit" ์ฌ์ฉ ์ค์ ๋๋ค. Audit the account service tests for tautological database mocks.
์์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ:
Tier 2 finding: three tests return hardcoded database rows and assert those same values. Replace them with database-backed behavior tests.
"gjalla-test-audit" ์ฌ์ฉ ์ค์ ๋๋ค. Find tests that do not exercise production code.
์์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ:
- Tier 1: The test recreates the source decision logic locally.
- Evidence: The test imports no production module.
- Action: Remove the duplicate logic test after approval and add a source-level test.
"gjalla-test-audit" ์ฌ์ฉ ์ค์ ๋๋ค. Review overlapping unit and integration tests.
์์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ:
Tier 3 finding: the mocked unit test duplicates the stronger database-backed scenario. Keep unique edge cases and remove redundant coverage after approval.
๋ณด์ ๊ฐ์ฌ
์์ All 15 static findings are false positives caused by Markdown inline-code formatting around test identifiers and examples. The source defines a review workflow and requires approval before cleanup actions. No prompt injection, data exfiltration, command execution, or network reconnaissance intent was found.
์ํ ์์ธ
โ๏ธ ์ธ๋ถ ๋ช ๋ น์ด (14)
์ด ๋ณด๊ณ ์ ๊ณต์ ๋ฐ ์ธ์ฉ
๋ฒ์ ์ด ์ง์ ๋ ํ๊ฐ ๋ณด๊ณ ์, ์ค๋ฆฝ ๋ฐฐ์ง, ์๋ฒ ๋ ์นด๋ ๋ฐ ์ธ์ฉ์ ๊ณต์ ํ์ธ์. Skillstore๋ ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ๋ฅผ ๋ณด๊ณ ํ์ง๋ง ์ด Skill์ ์์ ์ฌ๋ถ๋ฅผ ํ๋จํ์ง ์์ต๋๋ค.
๋ณด๊ณ ์ ๋งํฌ ๋ณต์ฌ
https://skillstore.io/skills/gjalla-gjalla-test-audit/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown ๋ฐฐ์ง
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/gjalla-gjalla-test-audit?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML ๋ฐฐ์ง
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/gjalla-gjalla-test-audit?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/gjalla-gjalla-test-audit/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>์๋ฒ ๋ ์นด๋
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/gjalla-gjalla-test-audit.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>ํ์ ์ธ์ฉ (APA ยท BibTeX ยท CFF)
APA ์ธ์ฉ
gjalla. (2026). gjalla-test-audit security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/gjalla-gjalla-test-audit/audits/1BibTeX ์ธ์ฉ
@techreport{gjalla-gjalla-gjalla-test-audit-2026,
author = {gjalla},
title = {gjalla-test-audit security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/gjalla-gjalla-test-audit/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "gjalla-test-audit security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "gjalla"
date-released: "2026-08-11"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/gjalla-gjalla-test-audit/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:gjalla-gjalla-test-audit:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore ์ ์
์ด ์ ์์ ์ด์ ์ฆ๊ฑฐ ์ ๋ขฐ๋: ์ค๊ฐ๋ง๋ค ์ ์๋ ๊ฒ
Review a legacy test suite
Find tests that inflate confidence without protecting current production behavior.
Harden a risky subsystem
Compare critical source paths with tests and identify missing realistic coverage.
Improve quality governance
Classify weak tests and create a prioritized remediation report for the team.
์ด ํ๋กฌํํธ๋ฅผ ์ฌ์ฉํด ๋ณด์ธ์
Audit the test suite in [directory]. Identify placeholder tests, tests without source imports, and obvious duplicated coverage. Report findings without changing files.
Review tests for [component]. Compare each test with its source code. Flag tautological mocks and explain which production defects each test cannot detect.
Audit tests covering [critical path]. Rank gaps by production impact, identify encoded bugs, and recommend realistic integration or round-trip tests.
Audit [test scope] across all test layers. Classify findings into deletion and replacement tiers. Estimate coverage impact and propose approved cleanup waves.
๋ชจ๋ฒ ์ฌ๋ก
- Provide the relevant test files and production source files together.
- Prioritize security boundaries, data access, and core business logic.
- Run tests and coverage between approved cleanup waves.
ํผํ๊ธฐ
- Do not judge test quality from coverage percentages alone.
- Do not remove weak tests before identifying replacement coverage.
- Do not classify mocked tests without comparing their behavior to production code.
์์ฃผ ๋ฌป๋ ์ง๋ฌธ
Does this skill modify tests automatically?
Which test frameworks are supported?
Can it detect tests that encode production bugs?
Does it replace code coverage tools?
What source access does the audit require?
How are findings prioritized?
๊ฐ๋ฐ์ ์ธ๋ถ ์ ๋ณด
์์ฑ์
gjalla๋ผ์ด์ ์ค
MIT
Skillstore ๋ฆฌ๋น์
r1
๋ฒ์ ์๋ด
์์ฑ์๊ฐ ๋ฒ์ ์ ์ ์ธํ์ง ์์์ต๋๋ค.
๋ฆฌํฌ์งํ ๋ฆฌ
https://github.com/gjalla/engineering/tree/774041e7ab8b8fde48418dd4cd41e417fb4d71d3/skills/gjalla-test-audit์ฐธ์กฐ
c40485c25b35e0203cf615647a1fd81ad7a69ea8
์ ์ง๋ณด์ ์ต์ ์ฑ
2026. 8. 11.
์ฌ์ฉ๋
0 ๋ค์ด๋ก๋ ยท 0 ์กฐํ
ํ์ผ ๊ตฌ์กฐ
๐ SKILL.md