스킬 gjalla-code-review

📦

gjalla-code-review

Name: gjalla-code-review
Author: gjalla

콘텐츠 리비전 r1 안전 ⚙️ 외부 명령어

Review Code Changes Before Merge

Code changes can hide correctness, security, and maintainability issues before merge. This skill reviews diffs from relevant perspectives and returns prioritized, location-specific fixes.

지원: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 78 브론즈

Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 78 브론즈

내 에이전트로 설치

이 요청을 에이전트에 복사하세요. 공식 Skill 페이지와 매니페스트가 포함되어 있습니다.

에이전트 요청

Review the Skillstore skill "gjalla-code-review" from https://skillstore.io/skills/gjalla-gjalla-code-review.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/gjalla-gjalla-code-review/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

에이전트는 계속해서 계획을 표시하고 보안 정책에서 요구하는 확인을 요청해야 합니다.

에이전트가 읽기 쉬운 리소스

AI 에이전트, 크롤러, 스크립트가 전체 페이지 대신 정리된 컨텍스트만 필요할 때 이 링크를 사용하세요.

Markdown 상세 GET /skills/gjalla-gjalla-code-review.md 서명된 manifest GET /api/skills/gjalla-gjalla-code-review/manifest 서명된 lockfile GET /api/skills/gjalla-gjalla-code-review/lockfile

테스트해 보기

"gjalla-code-review" 사용 중입니다. Review a change that adds payment retry behavior after request timeouts.

예상 결과:

Blocking — [changed file]:[line]. The retry path can submit a payment twice after a timeout. Add idempotency and test timeout recovery. Not verified: integration tests.

"gjalla-code-review" 사용 중입니다. Review a pull request that introduces a shared cache for user preferences.

예상 결과:

Should fix — [changed file]:[line]. The cache key does not include the user identifier, so preferences can cross accounts. Scope keys per user and add isolation tests.

"gjalla-code-review" 사용 중입니다. Review a focused documentation-only naming correction.

예상 결과:

No Blocking or Should fix findings. The updated term is consistent throughout the provided diff. Not verified: references outside the supplied files.

보안 감사

안전

v1 • 2026. 8. 11. 버전별 보고서 열기

The only static finding is a false positive: line 23 uses Markdown backticks to format `file:line` in prose. SKILL.md contains review guidance only, with no executable code, command invocation, or semantic threat identified.

스캔된 파일

분석된 줄 수

검토 항목

오탐 무시됨

위험 요인

⚙️ 외부 명령어 (1)

SKILL.md:23

가장 최근에 완료된 정적·의미론적 감사에서 확인된 보안 발견 사항이 감지되지 않았습니다. 이는 스킬에 부작용이 없음을 증명하지 않습니다.

감사자: codex

이 보고서 공유 및 인용

버전이 지정된 평가 보고서, 중립 배지, 임베드 카드 및 인용을 공유하세요. Skillstore는 근거를 보고하지만 이 Skill의 안전 여부를 판단하지 않습니다.

버전별 보고서 열기

보고서 링크 복사

https://skillstore.io/skills/gjalla-gjalla-code-review/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown 배지

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/gjalla-gjalla-code-review/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/gjalla-gjalla-code-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML 배지

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/gjalla-gjalla-code-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/gjalla-gjalla-code-review/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

임베드 카드

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/gjalla-gjalla-code-review.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

학술 인용 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA 인용

gjalla. (2026). gjalla-code-review security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/gjalla-gjalla-code-review/audits/1

BibTeX 인용

@techreport{gjalla-gjalla-gjalla-code-review-2026,
  author = {gjalla},
  title = {gjalla-code-review security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/gjalla-gjalla-code-review/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "gjalla-code-review security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "gjalla"
date-released: "2026-08-11"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/gjalla-gjalla-code-review/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:gjalla-gjalla-code-review:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore 점수

이 점수의 이유 증거 신뢰도: 중간

아키텍처

유지보수성

콘텐츠

커뮤니티

사양 준수

만들 수 있는 것

Review Before Opening a Pull Request

Find blocking defects and missing tests before requesting review from teammates.

Assess Merge Readiness

Prioritize actionable findings and decide whether a pull request is ready to merge.

Evaluate Product and Quality Impact

Examine user impact, acceptance criteria, failure modes, and maintainability across a proposed change.

이 프롬프트를 사용해 보세요

Basic Diff Review

Review this diff for merge readiness. Group findings as Blocking, Should fix, or Nit. Include location, problem, fix, and verification limits.

Pull Request Review

Review this pull request against its description and acceptance criteria. Focus on correctness, edge cases, tests, and maintainability. Prioritize actionable findings with locations.

Cross-Functional Review

Review this change from engineering, product, quality, and security perspectives where relevant. Identify second-order effects and missing handling. Explain merge risk and fixes.

Adversarial Ship-Readiness Review

Perform an adversarial ship-readiness review of this diff and linked specification. Trace data access, failure modes, compatibility, and user impact. Report only defensible findings.

모범 사례

Provide the full diff, change intent, acceptance criteria, and relevant specifications.
Include test results and known constraints so findings can distinguish verified behavior from assumptions.
Resolve Blocking findings first, then evaluate Should fix items within the release context.

피하기

Do not request approval from a partial diff that omits related changes.
Do not treat automated review as a substitute for tests or accountable human review.
Do not dismiss findings without checking the cited location, impact, and suggested fix.

자주 묻는 질문

What changes can this skill review?

It can review diffs and pull requests when the changed code and intended behavior are available.

How are findings prioritized?

Findings are grouped as Blocking, Should fix, or Nit according to merge risk and practical impact.

Does it review security concerns?

Yes. It examines data access, privacy, vulnerabilities, failure modes, and other security implications relevant to the change.

Can it approve a pull request automatically?

It can assess readiness, but final approval remains with the responsible reviewer and team.

Does it run tests?

No. It can evaluate provided tests and results, but it does not guarantee runtime verification.

What context produces the best review?

Provide the full diff, pull request description, acceptance criteria, linked specifications, test results, and known constraints.

개발자 세부 정보

작성자

gjalla

라이선스

MIT

Skillstore 리비전

버전 안내

작성자가 버전을 선언하지 않았습니다.

리포지토리

https://github.com/gjalla/engineering/tree/774041e7ab8b8fde48418dd4cd41e417fb4d71d3/skills/gjalla-code-review

참조

c40485c25b35e0203cf615647a1fd81ad7a69ea8

유지보수 최신성

2026. 8. 11.

사용량

0 다운로드 · 0 조회

파일 구조

📄 SKILL.md