스킬 product-design-harness

📦

product-design-harness

Name: product-design-harness
Author: cis2042

콘텐츠 리비전 r3 안전 📁 파일 시스템 접근🌐 네트워크 접근⚙️ 외부 명령어

Review Product Decisions Before Execution

Product teams can build quickly before testing their assumptions. This skill reviews user needs, evidence, and business viability to define a bounded next step.

지원: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 78 브론즈

Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 78 브론즈

내 에이전트로 설치

이 요청을 에이전트에 복사하세요. 공식 Skill 페이지와 매니페스트가 포함되어 있습니다.

에이전트 요청

Review the Skillstore skill "product-design-harness" from https://skillstore.io/skills/cis2042-product-design-harness.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/cis2042-product-design-harness/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

에이전트는 계속해서 계획을 표시하고 보안 정책에서 요구하는 확인을 요청해야 합니다.

에이전트가 읽기 쉬운 리소스

AI 에이전트, 크롤러, 스크립트가 전체 페이지 대신 정리된 컨텍스트만 필요할 때 이 링크를 사용하세요.

Markdown 상세 GET /skills/cis2042-product-design-harness.md 서명된 manifest GET /api/skills/cis2042-product-design-harness/manifest 서명된 lockfile GET /api/skills/cis2042-product-design-harness/lockfile

테스트해 보기

"product-design-harness" 사용 중입니다. Review weekly report exports requested through support tickets, without evidence of managers' current reporting behavior.

예상 결과:

Verdict: Verify. Weakest flow: Evidence.
Missing proof: recurring reporting work and the cost of the current workaround.
Next action: test a static report sample during workflow interviews.
Boundary: no scheduled exports, live customer data access, or external delivery.

"product-design-harness" 사용 중입니다. Review a proposed product direction supported only by untraceable founder impressions.

예상 결과:

Verdict: Stop/Reframe. Evidence tier: t0.
Reason: no traceable signal supports the core problem.
Reframed question: which specific actor experiences a recurring problem that can be observed?
Boundary: research and reframing only; no implementation handoff.

"product-design-harness" 사용 중입니다. Prepare an implementation handoff from an approved continue review and its linked evidence receipts.

예상 결과:

Handoff: context pack linked to the approved review.
Scope: exact copy of the review's allowed actions.
Controls: preserve approval gates, prohibited actions, unresolved assumptions, and stop conditions.
Validation: check the review and context pack together before implementation.

보안 감사

안전

v3 • 2026. 10. 23. 버전별 보고서 열기

All 133 static findings are false positives involving documentation, schema identifiers, review terminology, or benign local validation logic. No evidence found of credential access, unauthorized data transfer, shell substitution, or audit-directed prompt injection in the reviewed context. Documented verdict overrides concern accountable product decisions, not permission to override security controls.

스캔된 파일

9,551

분석된 줄 수

검토 항목

오탐 무시됨

위험 요인

📁 파일 시스템 접근 (10)

resources/docs/CODING-HARNESS-COMPARISON.md:3 resources/docs/CODING-HARNESS-COMPARISON.md:30 resources/docs/HARNESS.md:3 resources/docs/HARNESS.md:133 resources/docs/README.md:19 resources/docs/UX3.md:15 resources/docs/UX3.md:98 resources/examples/stop-reframe-review.md:8 resources/prompts/mode-selector.md:42 resources/templates/README.md:12

🌐 네트워크 접근 (38)

⚙️ 외부 명령어 (19)

SKILL.md:19 SKILL.md:20 SKILL.md:21 SKILL.md:23 SKILL.md:25 SKILL.md:27 SKILL.md:28 SKILL.md:30 SKILL.md:31 SKILL.md:64 SKILL.md:78 SKILL.md:80 SKILL.md:81 SKILL.md:103 SKILL.md:104 SKILL.md:105 SKILL.md:106 SKILL.md:107 SKILL.md:108

가장 최근에 완료된 정적·의미론적 감사에서 확인된 보안 발견 사항이 감지되지 않았습니다. 이는 스킬에 부작용이 없음을 증명하지 않습니다.

감사자: codex 감사 이력 보기 →

이 보고서 공유 및 인용

버전이 지정된 평가 보고서, 중립 배지, 임베드 카드 및 인용을 공유하세요. Skillstore는 근거를 보고하지만 이 Skill의 안전 여부를 판단하지 않습니다.

버전별 보고서 열기

보고서 링크 복사

https://skillstore.io/skills/cis2042-product-design-harness/audits/3?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown 배지

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/cis2042-product-design-harness/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/cis2042-product-design-harness?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML 배지

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/cis2042-product-design-harness?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/cis2042-product-design-harness/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

임베드 카드

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/cis2042-product-design-harness.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

학술 인용 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA 인용

cis2042. (2026). product-design-harness security audit report (audit version 3) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/cis2042-product-design-harness/audits/3

BibTeX 인용

@techreport{cis2042-cis2042-product-design-harness-2026,
  author = {cis2042},
  title = {product-design-harness security audit report (audit version 3)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {3},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/cis2042-product-design-harness/audits/3},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "product-design-harness security audit report (audit version 3)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "cis2042"
date-released: "2026-10-23"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/cis2042-product-design-harness/audits/3"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:cis2042-product-design-harness:audit:3"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore 점수

이 점수의 이유 증거 신뢰도: 중간

아키텍처

유지보수성

콘텐츠

커뮤니티

사양 준수

만들 수 있는 것

Assess a Feature Request

Review a proposed feature against user problems, supporting evidence, ownership cost, and the smallest useful test.

Challenge a Prototype Direction

Separate interview opinions from observed behavior and identify assumptions that require a focused prototype test.

Prepare a Bounded Agent Handoff

Validate an approved review and matching context pack before assigning implementation work to coding agents.

이 프롬프트를 사용해 보세요

Start a Product Review

Review this product direction: [direction]. Current evidence: [sources]. Owner and organization: [details]. Select a mode and list missing intake. Do not implement.

Run a Standard Gate

Run Standard Gate for [feature] at [stage]. Use [brief and evidence]. Review all three flows independently. Return the canonical review with boundaries and stop conditions.

Challenge a Risky Direction

Run UX3 Council for [decision]. Use [brief, evidence receipts, and owner]. Decompose claims, review lanes independently, and complete challenge rounds. Red-team unanimous continue results before synthesis.

Validate an Implementation Handoff

Use [continue review] to create a matching context pack. Copy scope and controls exactly. Validate both artifacts with the bundled checker. Report failures without implementing.

모범 사례

Provide traceable evidence, counter-signals, affected stakeholders, and a named accountable owner before requesting a decision.
Choose the smallest responsible review mode and keep human judgment separate from evidence tiers.
Validate review artifacts and linked context packs together; review again when scope, data, risk, or stakeholders change.

피하기

Treating quotes, simulated users, or internal confidence as proof of real behavior.
Averaging reviewer verdicts or removing counter-evidence to obtain approval.
Turning a verify result into general implementation work or expanding an approved context pack.

자주 묻는 질문

What does this skill review?

It reviews product directions, features, workflows, experiments, launches, automation, and scaling decisions through user, evidence, and business perspectives.

Which review mode should I use?

Use Quick Gate for small reversible changes, Standard Gate for new features, and UX3 Council for high uncertainty or meaningful risk.

What outcomes can a review return?

Continue permits a bounded handoff, verify permits one proof step, and stop_reframe returns a better product question.

Does the skill collect research automatically?

It defines evidence request and receipt contracts. Actual retrieval requires available tools or connectors; the bundled routing helper makes no model calls.

Do valid review artifacts prove that a decision is safe?

No. Validators check structure and selected consistency rules. They do not verify evidence truth, grant human approvals, or enforce runtime permissions.

Can I use this with Claude, Codex, and Claude Code?

Yes. The bundle provides Markdown instructions, schemas, examples, and Python validators. Your runtime must supply agent orchestration and any external tools.