스킬 w-retro

📦

w-retro

Name: w-retro
Author: blockmatic

콘텐츠 리비전 r1 안전

Review Completed Work and Improve Next Time

Teams often finish tasks without recording what changed, what evidence was missing, or what should improve. This skill produces a concise, task-specific retrospective with up to three practical next steps.

지원: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 78 브론즈

Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 78 브론즈

내 에이전트로 설치

이 요청을 에이전트에 복사하세요. 공식 Skill 페이지와 매니페스트가 포함되어 있습니다.

에이전트 요청

Review the Skillstore skill "w-retro" from https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

에이전트는 계속해서 계획을 표시하고 보안 정책에서 요구하는 확인을 요청해야 합니다.

에이전트가 읽기 쉬운 리소스

AI 에이전트, 크롤러, 스크립트가 전체 페이지 대신 정리된 컨텍스트만 필요할 때 이 링크를 사용하세요.

Markdown 상세 GET /skills/blockmatic-w-retro.md 서명된 manifest GET /api/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/manifest 서명된 lockfile GET /api/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/lockfile

테스트해 보기

"w-retro" 사용 중입니다. We needed to add export filtering. The filter shipped and unit tests passed, but no browser test was run.

예상 결과:

Requested versus shipped: Export filtering was added and unit-tested. Evidence gap: Browser behavior was not checked. Next change: Add one browser test for filter selection and downloaded results.

"w-retro" 사용 중입니다. The task was to update the onboarding guide. The guide changed, but the examples were not checked against the current interface.

예상 결과:

Requested versus shipped: The onboarding guide was updated, but example accuracy was not verified.
Process gap: The task lacked a user-interface consistency check.
Next changes: Review examples against the current interface and add a lightweight documentation checklist.

보안 감사

안전

v1 • 2026. 9. 20. 버전별 보고서 열기

The scanned skill is a 12-line, chat-only retrospective checklist with no executable code or detected security patterns. No prompt-injection, data-exfiltration, or business-logic abuse evidence was found in SKILL.md.

스캔된 파일

분석된 줄 수

검토 항목

오탐 무시됨

가장 최근에 완료된 정적·의미론적 감사에서 확인된 보안 발견 사항이 감지되지 않았습니다. 이는 스킬에 부작용이 없음을 증명하지 않습니다.

감사자: codex

이 보고서 공유 및 인용

버전이 지정된 평가 보고서, 중립 배지, 임베드 카드 및 인용을 공유하세요. Skillstore는 근거를 보고하지만 이 Skill의 안전 여부를 판단하지 않습니다.

버전별 보고서 열기

보고서 링크 복사

https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown 배지

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML 배지

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

임베드 카드

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/blockmatic-w-retro.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

학술 인용 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA 인용

blockmatic. (2026). w-retro security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/audits/1

BibTeX 인용

@techreport{blockmatic-blockmatic-w-retro-2026,
  author = {blockmatic},
  title = {w-retro security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "w-retro security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "blockmatic"
date-released: "2026-09-20"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:blockmatic-w-retro:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore 점수

이 점수의 이유 증거 신뢰도: 중간

아키텍처

유지보수성

콘텐츠

커뮤니티

사양 준수

만들 수 있는 것

Close a development task

Review the request, shipped changes, checks, and documentation before closing a coding task.

Improve team delivery

Capture specific process gaps after a sprint item, project milestone, or cross-functional deliverable.

Evaluate an AI-assisted workflow

Compare the requested work with the AI-produced result and record better checks for the next session.

이 프롬프트를 사용해 보세요

Basic task retrospective

Review the completed task in this conversation. State what was requested, what shipped, and one improvement for next time.

Check process gaps

Run a retrospective on this completed task. Identify skipped checks, unclear requirements, extra scope, and missing documentation. Suggest no more than three specific changes.

Compare plan and outcome

Compare the original request, plan, implementation, and validation evidence. Explain the most important differences and recommend up to three changes for the next similar task.

Audit an AI-assisted delivery

Perform a task-specific retrospective of this AI-assisted delivery. Separate outcome gaps from process gaps, cite the available evidence, and prioritize three changes that would improve the next session.

모범 사례

Run the skill after checks are complete and the delivered result is known.
Provide the original request, completed work, validation evidence, and relevant constraints.
Prefer specific recommendations tied to this task over broad process advice.

피하기

Do not use the retrospective as a substitute for implementing a required fix.
Do not request generic lessons without sharing task-specific evidence.
Do not turn a short retrospective into an unfocused list of every possible improvement.

자주 묻는 질문

When should I use this skill?

Use it after completing a task and recording the checks or evidence that support the result.

What does the skill review?

It compares the request with the shipped result and checks for process or evidence gaps.

How many improvements does it suggest?

It suggests at most three concrete changes for the next similar task.

Can it change files or create commits?

No. It responds in chat and does not implement changes, commit files, or open pull requests.

What context produces the best result?

Include the request, plan, completed work, validation checks, constraints, and known uncertainties.

Does it replace a formal incident review?

No. It supports routine task learning and does not replace incident, compliance, or security review processes.

개발자 세부 정보

작성자

blockmatic

라이선스

MIT

Skillstore 리비전

버전 안내

작성자가 버전을 선언하지 않았습니다.

리포지토리

https://github.com/blockmatic/basilic-skills/tree/5fa16493413923e31f1df31f7260224f0f291d9e/skills/w-retro

참조

7cd60e5c44d39477abb7a2c00ae0de2cf2a01392

유지보수 최신성

2026. 9. 20.

사용량

0 다운로드 · 0 조회

파일 구조

📄 SKILL.md