์Šคํ‚ฌ brag-doc-from-git
๐Ÿ“ฆ

brag-doc-from-git

v1.0 ์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ  ๋ฆฌ๋น„์ „ r1 ์ค‘๊ฐ„ ์œ„ํ—˜ โš™๏ธ ์™ธ๋ถ€ ๋ช…๋ น์–ด

Build an Evidence-Based Brag Document from Git

Review preparation is difficult when contributions are scattered across pull requests, commits, and personal notes. This skill groups that evidence into a Markdown draft and marks missing results instead of inventing impact.

์ง€์›: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Maintain this Skill? Claim it ๐Ÿ“Š 70 ์ ์ ˆํ•จ

๋‚ด ์—์ด์ „ํŠธ๋กœ ์„ค์น˜

์ด ์š”์ฒญ์„ ์—์ด์ „ํŠธ์— ๋ณต์‚ฌํ•˜์„ธ์š”. ๊ณต์‹ Skill ํŽ˜์ด์ง€์™€ ๋งค๋‹ˆํŽ˜์ŠคํŠธ๊ฐ€ ํฌํ•จ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์—์ด์ „ํŠธ ์š”์ฒญ
Review the Skillstore skill "brag-doc-from-git" from https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

์—์ด์ „ํŠธ๋Š” ๊ณ„์†ํ•ด์„œ ๊ณ„ํš์„ ํ‘œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ณด์•ˆ ์ •์ฑ…์—์„œ ์š”๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ํ™•์ธ์„ ์š”์ฒญํ•ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์—์ด์ „ํŠธ๊ฐ€ ์ฝ๊ธฐ ์‰ฌ์šด ๋ฆฌ์†Œ์Šค

AI ์—์ด์ „ํŠธ, ํฌ๋กค๋Ÿฌ, ์Šคํฌ๋ฆฝํŠธ๊ฐ€ ์ „์ฒด ํŽ˜์ด์ง€ ๋Œ€์‹  ์ •๋ฆฌ๋œ ์ปจํ…์ŠคํŠธ๋งŒ ํ•„์š”ํ•  ๋•Œ ์ด ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์„ธ์š”.

ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ•ด ๋ณด๊ธฐ

"brag-doc-from-git" ์‚ฌ์šฉ ์ค‘์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Sample evidence: PR #42 added retry handling on March 12. No outcome metrics were provided.

์˜ˆ์ƒ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ:

  • Theme: Reliability
  • What I did: Added retry handling.
  • Result: [GAP: What changed for users or the team?]
  • Evidence: March 12, supplied PR #42 reference.
  • Priority question: Do incident records show a change in failed requests after deployment?

"brag-doc-from-git" ์‚ฌ์šฉ ์ค‘์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Sample notes: I owned the cache integration in a team project. User-provided measurements show response time fell from 240 ms to 180 ms.

์˜ˆ์ƒ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ:

  • Theme: Performance
  • What I did: Contributed the cache integration to a team performance project.
  • Result: User-provided measurements show response time decreased from 240 ms to 180 ms.
  • Scope signal: Owned the cache integration, not the entire project.
  • Evidence gap: Add the project link and measurement source.

๋ณด์•ˆ ๊ฐ์‚ฌ

์ค‘๊ฐ„ ์œ„ํ—˜

All six static findings are false positives from Markdown delimiters, inline examples, or legitimate review-writing instructions. The authenticated GitHub search lacks repository filters and can retrieve private repository metadata outside the user-approved scope. No evidence found of malicious intent, credential theft, destructive commands, or audit-directed prompt injection.

1
์Šค์บ”๋œ ํŒŒ์ผ
50
๋ถ„์„๋œ ์ค„ ์ˆ˜
0
๊ฒ€ํ†  ํ•ญ๋ชฉ
0
์˜คํƒ ๋ฌด์‹œ๋จ

ํ™•์ธ๋œ ๋ณด์•ˆ ์šฐ๋ ค ์‚ฌํ•ญ (1)

์ค‘๊ฐ„
Authenticated Search Exceeds Approved Repository Scope
The GitHub CLI search filters by author and merge date but not repository. It can retrieve private PR metadata from unnamed repositories, contradicting the explicit access restriction.
Line 19 has no repository filter despite the access restriction on line 24. Actual exposure depends on authenticated account permissions and matching PRs.

์œ„ํ—˜ ์š”์ธ

โš™๏ธ ์™ธ๋ถ€ ๋ช…๋ น์–ด (4)
์ด ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ ๊ณต์œ  ๋ฐ ์ธ์šฉ

๋ฒ„์ „์ด ์ง€์ •๋œ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ, ์ค‘๋ฆฝ ๋ฐฐ์ง€, ์ž„๋ฒ ๋“œ ์นด๋“œ ๋ฐ ์ธ์šฉ์„ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜์„ธ์š”. Skillstore๋Š” ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ๋ฅผ ๋ณด๊ณ ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ด Skill์˜ ์•ˆ์ „ ์—ฌ๋ถ€๋ฅผ ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฒ„์ „๋ณ„ ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ ์—ด๊ธฐ
๋ณด์•ˆ ํ‰๊ฐ€

๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ ๋งํฌ ๋ณต์‚ฌ

https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/audits/2?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown ๋ฐฐ์ง€

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML ๋ฐฐ์ง€

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

์ž„๋ฒ ๋“œ ์นด๋“œ

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
ํ•™์ˆ  ์ธ์šฉ (APA ยท BibTeX ยท CFF)

APA ์ธ์šฉ

agentkitco. (2026). brag-doc-from-git security audit report (audit version 2) [Author version 1.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/audits/2

BibTeX ์ธ์šฉ

@techreport{agentkitco-agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git-2026, author = {agentkitco}, title = {brag-doc-from-git security audit report (audit version 2)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {2}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/audits/2}, note = {Author version 1.0} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "brag-doc-from-git security audit report (audit version 2)" version: "1.0" type: report authors: - name: "agentkitco" date-released: "2026-10-22" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/audits/2" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git:audit:2" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore ์ ์ˆ˜

์ด ์ ์ˆ˜์˜ ์ด์œ  ์ฆ๊ฑฐ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„: ์ค‘๊ฐ„
55
์•„ํ‚คํ…์ฒ˜
85
์œ ์ง€๋ณด์ˆ˜์„ฑ
87
์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ 
65
์ปค๋ฎค๋‹ˆํ‹ฐ
91
์‚ฌ์–‘ ์ค€์ˆ˜

๋งŒ๋“ค ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ

Prepare a Performance Self-Review

Group recent engineering contributions into evidence-backed themes and identify missing outcomes before submitting a review.

Assemble Promotion Evidence

Organize supported leadership, cross-team work, and technical contributions while preserving accurate ownership and evidence links.

Refresh Resume Accomplishments

Convert verified contributions into resume material and remove confidential details intended only for internal documents.

์ด ํ”„๋กฌํ”„ํŠธ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด ๋ณด์„ธ์š”

Start a Brag Document
Create a brag document for my last six months of work. Ask me which repositories to use before collecting evidence.
Review Local Contributions
Use local Git history in [repository] for [author email] since [date]. Group contributions by theme and mark unknown results as gaps.
Combine Code and Team Contributions
Draft my self-review for [date range] using only [approved repositories]. Restrict GitHub queries to those repositories. Include [mentoring and incident notes].
Prepare a Promotion Outline
Build a promotion outline from [approved evidence and notes]. Preserve team attribution, distinguish verified outcomes from gaps, and rank missing evidence. Ask three priority questions.

๋ชจ๋ฒ” ์‚ฌ๋ก€

  • Agree on the time window and repository list, then add explicit repository filters before running GitHub searches.
  • Provide outcome measurements, evidence links, and notes about contributions that Git does not record.
  • Review attribution and remove confidential information before sharing the draft outside your organization.

ํ”ผํ•˜๊ธฐ

  • Treating commit counts or pull request titles as proof of business impact.
  • Claiming sole ownership of team results without evidence of your specific contribution.
  • Running an unrestricted account-wide search when only named repositories are approved.

์ž์ฃผ ๋ฌป๋Š” ์งˆ๋ฌธ

Which AI tools can use this skill?
The skill lists Claude, Codex, and Claude Code as supported tools.
Does it require GitHub?
No. It includes a local Git log alternative filtered by author and start date.
What happens when results are unknown?
The draft marks missing outcomes with visible gaps and ends with prioritized questions instead of inventing metrics.
Can it include mentoring and incident work?
Yes. It asks for user notes about mentoring, incidents, reviews, and other contributions that Git history may not capture.
Will it search only the repositories I name?
The prose requires that boundary, but the example command lacks repository filters. Add explicit filters before running it.
What formats can it produce?
It produces Markdown and offers to adapt the final document into a self-review, promotion packet outline, or resume bullets.

๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์ž ์„ธ๋ถ€ ์ •๋ณด

์ž‘์„ฑ์ž

agentkitco

๋ผ์ด์„ ์Šค

MIT

์ž‘์„ฑ์ž ๋ฒ„์ „

v1.0

Skillstore ๋ฆฌ๋น„์ „

r1

๋ฒ„์ „ ์•ˆ๋‚ด

์ž‘์„ฑ์ž๊ฐ€ ์„ ์–ธํ•œ ๋ฒ„์ „์€ ์œ ํšจํ•œ SemVer๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹™๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ฐธ์กฐ

18efac79a818d7e997295839638fdd21906cfd1c

์œ ์ง€๋ณด์ˆ˜ ์ตœ์‹ ์„ฑ

2026. 10. 22.

์‚ฌ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰

5 ๋‹ค์šด๋กœ๋“œ ยท 1 ์กฐํšŒ

ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ตฌ์กฐ

๐Ÿ“„ SKILL.md

agentkitco์˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์Šคํ‚ฌ

์ „์ฒด ๋ณด๊ธฐ
์ „์ฒด ๋ณด๊ธฐ
๐Ÿ“ฆ

doc-coauthoring

79

๊ฐ€์ด๋“œ ๋ฆฌ๋ทฐ๋กœ ๋” ๋‚˜์€ ๋ฌธ์„œ ์ดˆ์•ˆ ์ž‘์„ฑ

์ž‘์„ฑ์ž ZhanlinCui

๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋ฌธ์„œ๋Š” ์ปจํ…์ŠคํŠธ, ๊ตฌ์กฐ, ๋…์ž์˜ ๊ฐ€์ •์ด ๋ถˆ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•ด์„œ ์‹คํŒจํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์Šคํ‚ฌ์€ Claude, Codex ๋˜๋Š” Claude Code๊ฐ€ ์ปจํ…์ŠคํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜๊ณ , ์„น์…˜ ์ดˆ์•ˆ์„ ์ž‘์„ฑํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋…์ž์˜ ์ดํ•ด๋„๋ฅผ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋ณต ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๊ณต๋™ ์ €์ž‘ ์›Œํฌํ”Œ๋กœ๋ฅผ ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋„๋ก ์•ˆ๋‚ดํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฌธ์„œํ™” ๋ณด๊ธฐ
๐Ÿ“ฆ

crafting-effective-readmes

79

๋Œ€์ƒ ๋…์ž ์ค‘์‹ฌ README ๋งŒ๋“ค๊ธฐ

์ž‘์„ฑ์ž softaworks

์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ README๋Š” ๊ธฐ์—ฌ์ž, ํŒ€์›, ๋˜๋Š” ๋ฏธ๋ž˜ ์œ ์ง€๋ณด์ˆ˜์ž์˜ ์š”๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ๋†“์น˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์Šคํ‚ฌ์€ Claude, Codex, Claude Code๊ฐ€ ๋Œ€์ƒ ๋…์ž ์งˆ๋ฌธ, ํ…œํ”Œ๋ฆฟ, ํ’ˆ์งˆ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ๋”ฐ๋ผ๊ฐ€๋„๋ก ์•ˆ๋‚ดํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฌธ์„œํ™” ๋ณด๊ธฐ
๐Ÿ“ฆ

book-scaffolding

79

๊ต์œก์šฉ ๋„์„œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๊ณ„ํš

์ž‘์„ฑ์ž 92Bilal26

๋Œ€ํ˜• ๊ต์œก์šฉ ๋„์„œ๋Š” ์ผ๊ด€์„ฑ์ด ๋–จ์–ด์ง€๊ฑฐ๋‚˜, ๋‚ด์šฉ์ด ๊ณผ๋„ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋งŽ์•„์ง€๊ฑฐ๋‚˜, ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ค์›Œ์งˆ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์Šคํ‚ฌ์€ ์žฅ์˜ ํ๋ฆ„, ์˜์กด ๊ด€๊ณ„, ํ•™์Šต ์ ๊ฒ€ ์ง€์ ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ๊ตฌ์กฐํ™”๋œ ๊ณ„ํš์„ ๋งŒ๋“ญ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฌธ์„œํ™” ๋ณด๊ธฐ
๐Ÿ“ฆ

documentation

79

์™„์ „ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ๋ฌธ์„œ ์ž‘์„ฑ

์ž‘์„ฑ์ž 89jobrien

๊ธฐ์ˆ  ํŒ€์—๋Š” API, ๋ฆด๋ฆฌ์Šค, ๋งˆ์ด๊ทธ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์ „๋ฐ˜์— ๊ฑธ์นœ ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•œ ๋ฌธ์„œ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์Šคํ‚ฌ์€ ํ…œํ”Œ๋ฆฟ๊ณผ ์‹ค์šฉ์ ์ธ ์˜ˆ์ œ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด ๊ตฌ์กฐํ™”๋œ ๋ฌธ์„œ๋ฅผ ๋งŒ๋“ญ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฌธ์„œํ™” ๋ณด๊ธฐ
๐Ÿ“ฆ

changelog-generator

79

Git ์ปค๋ฐ‹์—์„œ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ ๋กœ๊ทธ ์ƒ์„ฑ

์ž‘์„ฑ์ž ComposioHQ

๋ฆด๋ฆฌ์Šค ํŒ€์€ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ ์ธ ์ปค๋ฐ‹์„ ๊ณ ๊ฐ์ด ์ฝ๊ธฐ ์ข‹์€ ์—…๋ฐ์ดํŠธ๋กœ ๋ฐ”๊พธ๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ข…์ข… ๋ช‡ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ์”๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์Šคํ‚ฌ์€ ์ปค๋ฐ‹ ๊ธฐ๋ก์„ ๊ทธ๋ฃนํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ฆด๋ฆฌ์Šค, ์ฃผ๊ฐ„ ์š”์•ฝ, ์ œํ’ˆ ๋ฐœํ‘œ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•œ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ ๋กœ๊ทธ ์ดˆ์•ˆ์„ ์ž‘์„ฑํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฌธ์„œํ™” ๋ณด๊ธฐ
๐Ÿ“ฆ

git-advanced

86

๊ณ ๊ธ‰ Git ์›Œํฌํ”Œ๋กœ ๋งˆ์Šคํ„ฐํ•˜๊ธฐ

์ž‘์„ฑ์ž AutumnsGrove

๋ณต์žกํ•œ Git ํžˆ์Šคํ† ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์ž‘์—… ๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ์žƒ์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ๋ณต๊ตฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ค์šธ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์Šคํ‚ฌ์€ rebase, ์ถฉ๋Œ, bisect, ๋ณต๊ตฌ, ๋ธŒ๋žœ์น˜ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์•ˆ๋‚ดํ˜• ์›Œํฌํ”Œ๋กœ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ฝ”๋”ฉ ๋ฐ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ๋ณด๊ธฐ