스킬 web-quality-audit

📦

web-quality-audit

Name: web-quality-audit
Author: addyosmani

v2.0 콘텐츠 리비전 r1 안전 ⚙️ 외부 명령어🌐 네트워크 접근📁 파일 시스템 접근

Audit Web Quality with Measured Evidence

Web quality problems span performance, accessibility, search visibility, and interaction behavior. This skill guides evidence-based reviews with browser measurements, source checks, prioritized fixes, and repeatable verification.

지원: Claude Codex Code(CC)

📊 76 적절함

Maintain this Skill? Claim it 📊 76 적절함

내 에이전트로 설치

이 요청을 에이전트에 복사하세요. 공식 Skill 페이지와 매니페스트가 포함되어 있습니다.

에이전트 요청

Review the Skillstore skill "web-quality-audit" from https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-web-quality-audit.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/addyosmani-web-quality-audit/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

에이전트는 계속해서 계획을 표시하고 보안 정책에서 요구하는 확인을 요청해야 합니다.

에이전트가 읽기 쉬운 리소스

AI 에이전트, 크롤러, 스크립트가 전체 페이지 대신 정리된 컨텍스트만 필요할 때 이 링크를 사용하세요.

Markdown 상세 GET /skills/addyosmani-web-quality-audit.md 서명된 manifest GET /api/skills/addyosmani-web-quality-audit/manifest 서명된 lockfile GET /api/skills/addyosmani-web-quality-audit/lockfile

테스트해 보기

"web-quality-audit" 사용 중입니다. Illustrative request: review a local HTML page without browser access.

예상 결과:

Source finding: the page lacks a viewport declaration.
Source warning: an image has no alt attribute.
Recommended checks: inspect responsive layout and determine whether the image is informative or decorative.
Verification limit: rendered behavior and performance were not measured.

"web-quality-audit" 사용 중입니다. Illustrative request: summarize an audit of a mobile navigation flow.

예상 결과:

Evidence: keyboard testing found that the open menu does not show a visible focus indicator.
Priority: high because keyboard users cannot reliably locate the active control.
Recommendation: restore visible focus styling and test every menu action.
Verification: repeat the same flow after the change; screen reader validation remains pending.

보안 감사

안전

v1 • 2026. 10. 22. 버전별 보고서 열기

All 44 static findings are false positives from documentation markup, ordinary shell constructs, or read-only source checks. No evidence found of credential theft, data exfiltration, destructive behavior, or prompt injection in the two reviewed files. Live audits depend on external browser tools; linked sibling guidance was not included in this review.

스캔된 파일

324

분석된 줄 수

검토 항목

오탐 무시됨

위험 요인

가장 최근에 완료된 정적·의미론적 감사에서 확인된 보안 발견 사항이 감지되지 않았습니다. 이는 스킬에 부작용이 없음을 증명하지 않습니다.

감사자: codex

이 보고서 공유 및 인용

버전이 지정된 평가 보고서, 중립 배지, 임베드 카드 및 인용을 공유하세요. Skillstore는 근거를 보고하지만 이 Skill의 안전 여부를 판단하지 않습니다.

버전별 보고서 열기

보고서 링크 복사

https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-web-quality-audit/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown 배지

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/addyosmani-web-quality-audit/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-web-quality-audit?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML 배지

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-web-quality-audit?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/addyosmani-web-quality-audit/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

임베드 카드

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/addyosmani-web-quality-audit.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

학술 인용 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA 인용

addyosmani. (2026). web-quality-audit security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version 2.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-web-quality-audit/audits/1

BibTeX 인용

@techreport{addyosmani-addyosmani-web-quality-audit-2026,
  author = {addyosmani},
  title = {web-quality-audit security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-web-quality-audit/audits/1},
  note = {Author version 2.0}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "web-quality-audit security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "2.0"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "addyosmani"
date-released: "2026-10-22"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-web-quality-audit/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:addyosmani-web-quality-audit:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore 점수

이 점수의 이유 증거 신뢰도: 중간

아키텍처

유지보수성

콘텐츠

커뮤니티

사양 준수

만들 수 있는 것

Prepare a release review

Review representative pages and critical user flows, prioritize failures, and verify affected behavior before deployment.

Assess accessibility and interaction

Combine automated findings with keyboard navigation, focus, labels, and rendered semantic checks.

Prioritize website improvements

Compare technical SEO and performance evidence across important pages without treating scores as proof of business outcomes.

이 프롬프트를 사용해 보세요

Review one page

Audit [URL] for web quality. Use available tools and separate measured findings from source hypotheses. List the most important fixes.

Inspect local HTML

Check HTML in [directory] with the included read-only analyzer. Summarize issues and warnings. Identify checks that need a live browser.

Audit a critical journey

Audit [journey] on [URL] for mobile and desktop. Check accessibility, performance, SEO, and agentic browsing. Preserve authenticated state where possible.

Verify a remediation cycle

Establish a baseline for [URLs] under [conditions]. Prioritize evidence-backed fixes, implement approved changes, and repeat equivalent checks. Separate lab results from field validation.

모범 사례

Define representative URLs, authenticated states, important journeys, and device conditions before collecting evidence.
Keep browser measurements, field data, source hypotheses, and manual observations clearly separated.
Repeat checks under equivalent conditions and record unresolved human or field validation.

피하기

Treating a Lighthouse score or static source result as proof of overall quality.
Promising search ranking gains or AI visibility from technical audit results.
Comparing measurements across different conditions or ignoring state changes caused by navigation audits.

자주 묻는 질문

Does this skill include Lighthouse or a browser?

No. It guides available browser and Lighthouse tools and includes a local HTML checking script.

Can I use it without a live website?

Yes. Use source inspection or the included Bash script with jq. Runtime behavior and performance remain unverified.

Does the local script change files or contact websites?

No. It reads the selected file or directory and reports results. HTTP strings are matched locally, not requested.

Does it guarantee accessibility compliance?

No. Automated checks must be combined with keyboard, screen reader, and other human testing.

How does it handle authenticated pages?

It recommends preserving important states and using snapshot audits when navigation reloads would disrupt the review.

Can it prove better search rankings or AI visibility?

No. Technical SEO and agentic browsing findings are diagnostic signals, not guarantees of ranking, ingestion, or citation.

개발자 세부 정보

작성자

addyosmani

라이선스

MIT

작성자 버전

v2.0

Skillstore 리비전

버전 안내

작성자가 선언한 버전은 유효한 SemVer가 아닙니다.

리포지토리

https://github.com/addyosmani/web-quality-skills/tree/afa8da942115f2961fdbfa80807ea0b232ff6c00/skills/web-quality-audit

참조

69fd928457b33fd7f1fe5202b08da3f4cb17c28b

유지보수 최신성

2026. 10. 22.

사용량

0 다운로드 · 0 조회

파일 구조

📁 scripts/

📄 analyze.sh

📄 SKILL.md