📦

監査履歴

security-audit - 6 監査

バージョン比較

監査済みバージョン間の機能と検出結果の変化(新しい順)。

バージョン日付結果レビュー項目前バージョンとの変化
v6 最新2026년 7월 5일 오후 01:33 確認された検出結果なし0機能の変化なし
v5 2026년 7월 5일 오후 01:33 確認された検出結果なし0外部コマンド
v4 2026년 6월 27일 오후 06:40 1 確認済み0 外部コマンド
v3 2026년 1월 16일 오후 02:01 確認された検出結果なし0機能の変化なし
v2 2026년 1월 16일 오후 02:01 確認された検出結果なし0外部コマンド
v1 2026년 1월 10일 오전 09:28 確認された検出結果なし0基準

2026년 7월 5일 오후 01:33

All three static findings were adjudicated as false positives. The suspected template-injection line is an audit report placeholder, and the two shell-execution findings are Markdown file references. No semantic evidence of prompt injection, exfiltration, or malicious intent was found.

3
スキャンされたファイル
437
解析済み行数
1
レビュー項目
0
誤検知を無視

リスク要因

⚙️ 外部コマンド (2)
監査者: codex

2026년 7월 5일 오후 01:33

All three static findings were adjudicated as false positives. The suspected template-injection line is an audit report placeholder, and the two shell-execution findings are Markdown file references. No semantic evidence of prompt injection, exfiltration, or malicious intent was found.

3
スキャンされたファイル
437
解析済み行数
1
レビュー項目
0
誤検知を無視

リスク要因

⚙️ 外部コマンド (2)
監査者: codex

2026년 6월 27일 오후 06:40

Static findings were reviewed in context and are false positives from markdown placeholders, checklist terms, and fenced report examples. No executable scripts, network calls, credential access, prompt injection, or malicious intent were found. The skill has low dual-use risk because it helps document security findings and proof-of-concept evidence.

3
スキャンされたファイル
437
解析済み行数
1
レビュー項目
1
誤検知を無視

確認済みのセキュリティ上の懸念 (1)

低
Dual-Use Security Reporting Template
The report template includes fields for proof-of-concept details, remediation code, and scan outputs. This is appropriate for a security audit skill, but users should handle exploit evidence responsibly.
The referenced lines are markdown template sections for audit evidence, not executable code. The content is dual-use but does not provide exploit logic or automate attacks.
静的解析の誤検知を無視 (1)

これらの静的マッチはセマンティックレビューで却下されたか、スキーマのみのトークンに一致したため、透明性のために表示されていますが、品質スコアには影響しません。

低
Static Findings Dismissed as Non-Executable Markdown
The weak cryptography, Windows SAM, prompt injection, and shell execution detections are false positives. They match ordinary security terminology, placeholder text, inline backticks, and fenced markdown blocks.
Manual review shows the flagged content is documentation and checklist material. No command execution syntax, cryptographic implementation, SAM database access, or prompt override instruction is present.
監査者: codex

2026년 1월 16일 오후 02:01

This is a pure documentation skill containing no executable code, no file system access, no network calls, and no external command execution. All 39 static findings are false positives caused by the scanner misinterpreting markdown syntax (code fences as backticks, CWE references as cryptographic algorithms, and template placeholders as template injection). The skill contains only documentation, templates, and guidelines for security auditing methodology.

4
スキャンされたファイル
634
解析済み行数
1
レビュー項目
0
誤検知を無視
監査者: claude

2026년 1월 16일 오후 02:01

This is a pure documentation skill containing no executable code, no file system access, no network calls, and no external command execution. All 39 static findings are false positives caused by the scanner misinterpreting markdown syntax (code fences as backticks, CWE references as cryptographic algorithms, and template placeholders as template injection). The skill contains only documentation, templates, and guidelines for security auditing methodology.

4
スキャンされたファイル
634
解析済み行数
1
レビュー項目
0
誤検知を無視
監査者: claude

2026년 1월 10일 오전 09:28

Pure prompt-based skill with no executable code, no file system access, no network calls, and no external command execution. Contains only documentation, templates, and guidelines for security auditing.

3
スキャンされたファイル
437
解析済み行数
0
レビュー項目
0
誤検知を無視
この完了済み監査には、確認済みのセキュリティ検出事項は記録されていません。
監査者: claude