backtest-expert
Evaluate Trading Backtests for Robustness
Backtest results can hide overfitting, weak samples, and unrealistic execution assumptions. This skill applies structured scoring, stress tests, and bias checks.
自分のエージェントでインストール
このリクエストをエージェントにコピーしてください。正規の Skill ページとマニフェストが含まれています。
Review the Skillstore skill "backtest-expert" from https://skillstore.io/skills/tradermonty-backtest-expert.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/tradermonty-backtest-expert/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.エージェントは引き続き計画を提示し、セキュリティポリシーで必要な確認を求める必要があります。
エージェントが読めるリソース
AI エージェント、クローラー、スクリプトがページ全体ではなく整理されたコンテキストを必要とする場合は、これらのリンクを使ってください。
テストする
「backtest-expert」を使用しています。 Evaluate 150 trades, 62 percent wins, 1.8 percent average win, 1.2 percent average loss, 15 percent drawdown, eight years, three parameters, with slippage tested.
期待される結果:
Deploy, 81 out of 100. The sample, expectancy, drawdown, test duration, parameter count, and execution assumptions support further consideration. Independent validation remains necessary.
「backtest-expert」を使用しています。 Review 24 trades over two years with eight parameters and no slippage test.
期待される結果:
- Verdict: Abandon.
- The sample is below the minimum threshold.
- The test period may omit important market regimes.
- Eight parameters indicate substantial overfitting risk.
- Execution costs have not been validated.
「backtest-expert」を使用しています。 Explain why a profitable strategy fails after realistic trading costs.
期待される結果:
The reported edge is smaller than expected slippage and commissions. Test conservative fills and nearby parameters before deciding whether the hypothesis remains viable.
セキュリティ監査
安全All 17 static findings are false positives caused by trading prose, Python test identifiers, Markdown code fences, and inline code formatting. The skill performs local calculations and writes requested reports, with no network access, secret handling, prompt injection, or dynamic shell execution found.
リスク要因
このレポートを共有・引用
バージョン付き評価レポート、中立的なバッジ、埋め込みカード、引用を共有できます。Skillstore は証拠を報告しますが、この Skill が安全かどうかは判断しません。
レポートリンクをコピー
https://skillstore.io/skills/tradermonty-backtest-expert/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdownバッジ
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/tradermonty-backtest-expert?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTMLバッジ
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/tradermonty-backtest-expert?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/tradermonty-backtest-expert/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>埋め込みカード
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/tradermonty-backtest-expert.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>学術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA形式の引用
tradermonty. (2026). backtest-expert security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/tradermonty-backtest-expert/audits/1BibTeX形式の引用
@techreport{tradermonty-tradermonty-backtest-expert-2026,
author = {tradermonty},
title = {backtest-expert security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/tradermonty-backtest-expert/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "backtest-expert security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "tradermonty"
date-released: "2026-09-27"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/tradermonty-backtest-expert/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:tradermonty-backtest-expert:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore スコア
このスコアの理由 証拠の信頼度: 中作成できるもの
Screen a New Strategy
Review early backtest metrics and identify the highest-priority validation gaps before further development.
Challenge Research Results
Apply bias checks, parameter stress tests, and walk-forward criteria during a formal research review.
Teach Robust Validation
Demonstrate why sample size, execution friction, market regimes, and out-of-sample testing affect confidence.
これらのプロンプトを試す
Evaluate this backtest: [trades], [win rate], [average win], [average loss], [drawdown], [years], [parameters], and [slippage tested]. Explain the verdict simply.
Create a stress test plan for this strategy: [rules]. Cover parameter ranges, slippage, commissions, fill quality, sample size, and market regimes.
Analyze these failed backtest results: [results]. Identify breaking points, likely biases, weak assumptions, and the next tests that could reject or refine the hypothesis.
Audit this strategy and evidence: [strategy], [metrics], [periods], [cost assumptions], [parameter tests], and [out-of-sample results]. Produce a prioritized robustness assessment and deployment conditions.
ベストプラクティス
- Define entry, exit, sizing, filters, and the trading universe before testing.
- Use multiple market regimes, out-of-sample periods, and conservative execution costs.
- Prefer broad performance plateaus over isolated optimal parameter values.
回避
- Do not select only successful instruments, periods, or examples.
- Do not optimize many parameters and report only the best configuration.
- Do not treat a high score or historical return as proof of future performance.
よくある質問
Does this skill run a complete backtest?
Does it need market data or API keys?
What reports does the script create?
What does a Deploy verdict mean?
Can it detect overfitting?
Is this financial advice?
開発者情報
作成者
tradermontyライセンス
MIT
Skillstore リビジョン
r1
バージョンに関する注意
作者はバージョンを宣言していません。
参照
8b5ad1599e7c55e9b6c627bca3f556f6e9061cb1
メンテナンスの新しさ
2026/9/30
利用状況
0 ダウンロード · 0 閲覧
ファイル構成