スキル sent-routing-strategist

📦

sent-routing-strategist

Name: sent-routing-strategist
Author: sentdm

コンテンツリビジョン r1 安全 ⚙️ 外部コマンド

Plan Sent Message Routing

Incorrect channel choices can cause duplicate deliveries, extra charges, failed fallback, and unsafe retries. This skill explains routing decisions and diagnoses outcomes from Sent evidence.

対応: Claude Codex Code(CC)

📊 74 十分

自分のエージェントでインストール

このリクエストをエージェントにコピーしてください。正規の Skill ページとマニフェストが含まれています。

エージェントリクエスト

Review the Skillstore skill "sent-routing-strategist" from https://skillstore.io/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

エージェントは引き続き計画を提示し、セキュリティポリシーで必要な確認を求める必要があります。

エージェントが読めるリソース

AI エージェント、クローラー、スクリプトがページ全体ではなく整理されたコンテキストを必要とする場合は、これらのリンクを使ってください。

Markdown詳細 GET /skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist.md 署名済み manifest GET /api/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/manifest 署名済み lockfile GET /api/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/lockfile

テストする

「sent-routing-strategist」を使用しています。 We want WhatsApp first and SMS only if WhatsApp fails. Should we send both channel values?

期待される結果:

Use automatic routing by omitting the channel field or selecting Sent automatic routing. Supplying both channels creates two independent messages per recipient.

「sent-routing-strategist」を使用しています。 A message shows FAILED on WhatsApp, then newer queued and delivered events on SMS.

期待される結果:

The WhatsApp route failed and automatic routing reused the same message identifier.
The newer SMS delivery is the current logical outcome.
Project state by event time and keep each route attempt in the activity history.

「sent-routing-strategist」を使用しています。 A campaign has 1,000 recipients and two channel values.

期待される結果:

The request creates 2,000 messages and potentially 2,000 charges. Confirm simultaneous delivery is intentional before sending.

セキュリティ監査

安全

v1 • 2026/9/2 バージョン別レポートを開く

All 33 static findings are false positives caused by Markdown code spans or ordinary product troubleshooting guidance. The skill contains no executable commands, system reconnaissance, prompt injection, or other semantic security concerns.

スキャンされたファイル

312

解析済み行数

レビュー項目

誤検知を無視

リスク要因

最新の完了済み静的・セマンティック監査では、確認済みのセキュリティ検出事項は見つかりませんでした。これは、スキルに副作用がないことを証明するものではありません。

監査者: codex

このレポートを共有・引用

バージョン付き評価レポート、中立的なバッジ、埋め込みカード、引用を共有できます。Skillstore は証拠を報告しますが、この Skill が安全かどうかは判断しません。

バージョン別レポートを開く

レポートリンクをコピー

https://skillstore.io/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdownバッジ

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTMLバッジ

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

埋め込みカード

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

学術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA形式の引用

sentdm. (2026). sent-routing-strategist security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/audits/1

BibTeX形式の引用

@techreport{sentdm-sentdm-sent-routing-strategist-2026,
  author = {sentdm},
  title = {sent-routing-strategist security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "sent-routing-strategist security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "sentdm"
date-released: "2026-09-02"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:sentdm-sent-routing-strategist:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore スコア

このスコアの理由証拠の信頼度: 中

アーキテクチャ

保守性

コンテンツ

コミュニティ

仕様準拠

作成できるもの

Choose a routing mode

Select automatic routing, a pinned channel, or a deliberate broadcast before implementing a send.

Diagnose delivery outcomes

Use message status, channel, activities, and webhook history to explain unexpected routing behavior.

Review campaign cost

Calculate message volume and charges before approving a multi-recipient or multi-channel campaign.

これらのプロンプトを試す

Select a channel mode

I need to send [message type] to [audience]. Explain whether I should omit channel, use automatic routing, pin one channel, or broadcast.

Explain an unexpected outcome

My message ended with status [status] and channel [channel]. Explain the likely causes, evidence to inspect, and whether I should retry.

Trace a reroute

Review this ordered activity and webhook history: [events]. Reconstruct each route attempt and identify the current logical message state.

Audit a routing design

Evaluate this routing plan: [plan]. Check broadcast multiplication, channel constraints, fallback assumptions, retry rules, consent, status projection, and expected charges.

ベストプラクティス

Prefer automatic routing unless compliance, contracts, or content require one channel.
Use activity history and current message state before classifying a failure as final.
Calculate recipients multiplied by channels before approving a multi-channel request.