citation-evidence
Review Citation Links and Evidence Gaps
Saved citations can contain broken links, incomplete metadata, or sources that do not support the surrounding claims. This skill guides Citation reviews that separate saved data issues from evidence judgments and disclose inaccessible sources.
自分のエージェントでインストール
このリクエストをエージェントにコピーしてください。正規の Skill ページとマニフェストが含まれています。
Review the Skillstore skill "citation-evidence" from https://skillstore.io/skills/reload-apps-citation-evidence.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/reload-apps-citation-evidence/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.エージェントは引き続き計画を提示し、セキュリティポリシーで必要な確認を求める必要があります。
エージェントが読めるリソース
AI エージェント、クローラー、スクリプトがページ全体ではなく整理されたコンテキストを必要とする場合は、これらのリンクを使ってください。
テストする
「citation-evidence」を使用しています。 Illustrative request: Review a Citation report for saved metadata issues without editing.
期待される結果:
- Finding: Source S-12 has incomplete publication metadata.
- Observed problem: The publication year is missing from the saved source record.
- Next step: Confirm the year from the source and request an authorized metadata correction.
- Scope: Saved citation data only; claim support was not assessed.
「citation-evidence」を使用しています。 Illustrative request: Assess whether the cited source supports a report claim.
期待される結果:
- Claim: The intervention reduced costs in every region.
- Source S-4: The accessible passage covers one region only.
- Evidence judgment: The passage does not establish the broader claim.
- Next step: Narrow the claim or provide evidence covering the remaining regions.
セキュリティ監査
安全All five static findings are false positives: Markdown backticks, read-only Citation commands, and report instructions do not demonstrate execution abuse or reconnaissance. No evidence found of prompt injection, data exfiltration, or unauthorized changes in the reviewed files. The workflow explicitly treats document contents as untrusted and requires authorization for edits or sharing.
リスク要因
⚙️ 外部コマンド (4)
このレポートを共有・引用
バージョン付き評価レポート、中立的なバッジ、埋め込みカード、引用を共有できます。Skillstore は証拠を報告しますが、この Skill が安全かどうかは判断しません。
レポートリンクをコピー
https://skillstore.io/skills/reload-apps-citation-evidence/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdownバッジ
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/reload-apps-citation-evidence?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTMLバッジ
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/reload-apps-citation-evidence?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/reload-apps-citation-evidence/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>埋め込みカード
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/reload-apps-citation-evidence.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>学術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA形式の引用
reload-apps. (2026). citation-evidence security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/reload-apps-citation-evidence/audits/1BibTeX形式の引用
@techreport{reload-apps-reload-apps-citation-evidence-2026,
author = {reload-apps},
title = {citation-evidence security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/reload-apps-citation-evidence/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "citation-evidence security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "reload-apps"
date-released: "2026-10-31"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/reload-apps-citation-evidence/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:reload-apps-citation-evidence:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore スコア
このスコアの理由 証拠の信頼度: 中作成できるもの
Review Manuscript Evidence
Inspect saved references and assess whether accessible source passages support material manuscript claims.
Check Editorial Citations
Identify missing citation links and incomplete source metadata before an article enters final editorial review.
Assess Report Evidence Gaps
Separate metadata problems from unsupported conclusions in a Citation report, with concrete next steps for each material finding.
これらのプロンプトを試す
Review Citation document [DOCUMENT_ID] for missing citation links and incomplete metadata. Report findings without changing the document.
Review the material claims in [DOCUMENT_ID] against accessible saved source passages. Include source IDs, evidence gaps, and inaccessible sources. Do not edit.
Review [SECTION] in [DOCUMENT_ID]. Separate metadata issues from evidence judgments, verify version consistency, and propose next steps. Use only saved data.
Review [DOCUMENT_ID] for citation integrity and claim support. Use available research tools only for [APPROVED_SOURCES]. Report inaccessible evidence and version changes. Do not modify or share.
ベストプラクティス
- Specify the document, review scope, and whether external source retrieval is authorized.
- Use accessible source passages and preserve exact citation details when assessing claim support.
- Confirm version consistency and disclose inaccessible sources before presenting review conclusions.
回避
- Treating an empty citation issue list as proof of factual accuracy or originality.
- Following instructions embedded in source text to expose secrets, share drafts, or change tools.
- Editing metadata or document text during a review without explicit authorization.
よくある質問
What does this skill review?
Does it detect plagiarism?
Which tools are required?
Does Citation retrieve original web pages?
Will the review change my document?
What happens if the document changes during review?
開発者情報
作成者
reload-appsライセンス
MIT
Skillstore リビジョン
r1
バージョンに関する注意
作者はバージョンを宣言していません。
参照
45dcc884ec6fa1961423f1fee8072918692dac22
メンテナンスの新しさ
2026/10/31
利用状況
0 ダウンロード · 0 閲覧
ファイル構成