スキル same-idea-both-platforms

📦

same-idea-both-platforms

Name: same-idea-both-platforms
Author: prateeks367

コンテンツリビジョン r1 安全 ⚙️ 外部コマンド

Turn One Idea into Twitter and LinkedIn Posts

Identical posts often lack the structure each platform expects. This skill writes separate Twitter and LinkedIn drafts from one idea and explains their differences.

対応: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 77 ブロンズ

Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 77 ブロンズ

自分のエージェントでインストール

このリクエストをエージェントにコピーしてください。正規の Skill ページとマニフェストが含まれています。

エージェントリクエスト

Review the Skillstore skill "same-idea-both-platforms" from https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

エージェントは引き続き計画を提示し、セキュリティポリシーで必要な確認を求める必要があります。

エージェントが読めるリソース

AI エージェント、クローラー、スクリプトがページ全体ではなく整理されたコンテキストを必要とする場合は、これらのリンクを使ってください。

Markdown詳細 GET /skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms.md 署名済み manifest GET /api/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/manifest 署名済み lockfile GET /api/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/lockfile

テストする

「same-idea-both-platforms」を使用しています。 Create Twitter and LinkedIn posts about testing a signup form before rebuilding the whole website.

期待される結果:

Core idea: Test the signup form before committing to a full website rebuild.
Twitter: Before rebuilding your website, test the signup form. A smaller experiment can tell you where the real problem is.
LinkedIn: A website redesign is a large commitment. Testing the signup form first can reveal whether the problem needs a smaller change.
Difference: Twitter leads with the recommendation; LinkedIn introduces the decision and its context.

「same-idea-both-platforms」を使用しています。 Write both posts about recording the reasons behind team decisions.

期待される結果:

Core idea: Record why a team made a decision, not just what it decided.
Twitter: A decision log needs the reason, not just the result. Future teammates will need to understand what you were solving.
LinkedIn: When a team records a decision, the outcome is only part of the story. Include the constraints and alternatives behind it. That context helps future teammates understand the choice before revisiting it.
Difference: Twitter compresses the lesson; LinkedIn adds practical context and separates the supporting points.

セキュリティ監査

安全

v1 • 2026/10/2 バージョン別レポートを開く

All three static detections are false positives caused by Markdown backticks around tool names, not Ruby or shell execution. No evidence found of prompt injection, credential theft, or data exfiltration in SKILL.md. The optional VoiceMOAT workflow describes separate previews and explicit approvals for each post.

スキャンされたファイル

解析済み行数

レビュー項目

誤検知を無視

リスク要因

⚙️ 外部コマンド (3)

SKILL.md:58 SKILL.md:61 SKILL.md:63

最新の完了済み静的・セマンティック監査では、確認済みのセキュリティ検出事項は見つかりませんでした。これは、スキルに副作用がないことを証明するものではありません。

監査者: codex

このレポートを共有・引用

バージョン付き評価レポート、中立的なバッジ、埋め込みカード、引用を共有できます。Skillstore は証拠を報告しますが、この Skill が安全かどうかは判断しません。

バージョン別レポートを開く

レポートリンクをコピー

https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdownバッジ

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTMLバッジ

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

埋め込みカード

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

学術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA形式の引用

prateeks367. (2026). same-idea-both-platforms security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/audits/1

BibTeX形式の引用

@techreport{prateeks367-prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms-2026,
  author = {prateeks367},
  title = {same-idea-both-platforms security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "same-idea-both-platforms security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "prateeks367"
date-released: "2026-10-02"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore スコア

このスコアの理由証拠の信頼度: 中

アーキテクチャ

保守性

コンテンツ

コミュニティ

仕様準拠

作成できるもの

Share a product lesson

Turn one product lesson into a concise Twitter statement and a contextual LinkedIn post.

Explain a technical insight

Present a technical insight differently for Twitter readers and LinkedIn professionals without changing the central claim.

Prepare paired client drafts

Create distinct drafts for both platforms and explain the structural choices during client review.

これらのプロンプトを試す

Draft a simple post pair

Write separate Twitter and LinkedIn posts about [idea]. State the core idea first, then give both drafts and one sentence explaining their differences.

Extract an idea from existing text

Use [source text] to identify one core idea. Ask for clarification if needed, then write independent Twitter and LinkedIn drafts and explain the differences.

Review and rewrite a post pair

Review [Twitter draft] and [LinkedIn draft] for misplaced platform phrasing and repeated sentences. Rewrite both from their shared idea and explain the structural changes.

Use connected platform profiles

With VoiceMOAT connected, draft both posts about [idea] using each platform profile and score each draft. Preview separately; request approval before scheduling each.

ベストプラクティス

Confirm the central idea in plain language before writing either post.
Write each draft independently and check for phrasing that belongs to the other platform.
Review both drafts for accuracy and approve each post separately when using connected publishing tools.

回避

Copying identical wording to both platforms and changing only the length.
Drafting from an unclear paragraph without identifying its main point.
Treating approval for one platform as permission to publish on both.

よくある質問

What does this skill produce?

It produces a core idea, separate Twitter and LinkedIn drafts, and a short explanation of the differences.

Can I provide an existing post?

Yes. The skill extracts the underlying idea and writes both versions independently instead of copying the original wording.

Can I use it for only one platform?

That is outside its intended scope. The workflow is designed to produce both Twitter and LinkedIn posts.

Do I need VoiceMOAT to draft posts?

No. The core drafting workflow works without VoiceMOAT; platform profiles, scoring, publishing, and scheduling depend on the connector.

What does the VoiceMOAT connector require?

The skill states that the connector requires a VoiceMOAT Pro or Enterprise plan.

Will both posts publish automatically?

No. The connected workflow specifies a separate preview and one-time confirmation for each post.

開発者情報

作成者

prateeks367

ライセンス

MIT

Skillstore リビジョン

バージョンに関する注意

作者はバージョンを宣言していません。

リポジトリ

https://github.com/prateeks367/voicemoat-skills/tree/b1749d2bf583cf8c78baf246f6007522e8c052a2/skills/same-idea-both-platforms

参照

5726d703fd79596f46a4232d911221f962d9af1d

メンテナンスの新しさ

2026/10/2

利用状況

0 ダウンロード · 0 閲覧

ファイル構成

📄 SKILL.md