nex-eudr-due-diligence
Prepare EUDR Due Diligence Drafts
EUDR reviews require coordinated product, supplier, and sourcing evidence. This guide helps your assistant draft applicability decisions, supplier checklists, and due diligence documentation for professional review.
自分のエージェントでインストール
このリクエストをエージェントにコピーしてください。正規の Skill ページとマニフェストが含まれています。
Review the Skillstore skill "nex-eudr-due-diligence" from https://skillstore.io/skills/nexaiguy-nex-eudr-due-diligence.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/nexaiguy-nex-eudr-due-diligence/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.エージェントは引き続き計画を提示し、セキュリティポリシーで必要な確認を求める必要があります。
エージェントが読めるリソース
AI エージェント、クローラー、スクリプトがページ全体ではなく整理されたコンテキストを必要とする場合は、これらのリンクを使ってください。
テストする
「nex-eudr-due-diligence」を使用しています。 We import coffee from Brazil into the EU. What should our initial EUDR review cover?
期待される結果:
- Draft scope review: check the product CN code against the current Annex I.
- Role review: assess whether the company acts as an operator based on the transaction.
- Evidence needed: company size, transaction details, supplier records, and plot geolocation.
- Next step: verify applicable dates and current country benchmarks before finalizing the assessment.
「nex-eudr-due-diligence」を使用しています。 Create a supplier checklist for a cocoa shipment with missing plot coordinates.
期待される結果:
- Missing evidence: geolocation for each production plot.
- Supplier request: provide plot identifiers, coordinates, and relevant legality evidence.
- Review task: validate coordinate formats and confirm plot coverage.
- Status: due diligence draft remains incomplete until required evidence is reviewed.
セキュリティ監査
安全All three static findings are false positives: the URLs are attribution links, and the footer contains no reconnaissance instructions. No evidence found of prompt injection, unauthorized data transfer, or executable behavior in the reviewed guide. Legal claims require independent verification against current official sources.
リスク要因
🌐 ネットワークアクセス (2)
このレポートを共有・引用
バージョン付き評価レポート、中立的なバッジ、埋め込みカード、引用を共有できます。Skillstore は証拠を報告しますが、この Skill が安全かどうかは判断しません。
レポートリンクをコピー
https://skillstore.io/skills/nexaiguy-nex-eudr-due-diligence/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdownバッジ
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/nexaiguy-nex-eudr-due-diligence?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTMLバッジ
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/nexaiguy-nex-eudr-due-diligence?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/nexaiguy-nex-eudr-due-diligence/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>埋め込みカード
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/nexaiguy-nex-eudr-due-diligence.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>学術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA形式の引用
nexaiguy. (2026). nex-eudr-due-diligence security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version 1.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/nexaiguy-nex-eudr-due-diligence/audits/1BibTeX形式の引用
@techreport{nexaiguy-nexaiguy-nex-eudr-due-diligence-2026,
author = {nexaiguy},
title = {nex-eudr-due-diligence security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/nexaiguy-nex-eudr-due-diligence/audits/1},
note = {Author version 1.0}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "nex-eudr-due-diligence security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "1.0"
type: report
authors:
- name: "nexaiguy"
date-released: "2026-11-02"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/nexaiguy-nex-eudr-due-diligence/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:nexaiguy-nex-eudr-due-diligence:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore スコア
このスコアの理由 証拠の信頼度: 中作成できるもの
Review Importer Applicability
Organize product scope, operator role, and missing evidence before preparing an EUDR due diligence file.
Assess Downstream Obligations
Draft a review of downstream roles and potential reliefs, identifying legal assumptions requiring verification.
Request Supplier Plot Evidence
Prepare supplier requests for geolocation data, coordinate formats, and plot-level legality evidence.
これらのプロンプトを試す
We import coffee from Brazil into the EU. Draft an EUDR applicability review and list missing information. Flag legal claims requiring current official verification.
Using these supplier details: [details], draft a geolocation and legality evidence checklist. Separate available evidence from missing data and unverified claims.
Using this product and sourcing evidence: [evidence], draft an Annex II Due Diligence Statement outline. Mark missing fields and assumptions. Do not submit anything.
Review these supply chains: [details]. Draft Article 10 risk assessments using supplied official country benchmarks. Explain provisional conclusions, evidence gaps, and required mitigation.
ベストプラクティス
- Provide product descriptions, CN codes, company role, and sourcing details before requesting an applicability assessment.
- Verify regulatory dates, product scope, and country benchmarks against current official sources.
- Keep evidence traceable to each supply chain and obtain professional review before submission.
回避
- Treating a generated draft as legal advice or a guarantee of compliance.
- Accepting country risk labels or CN mappings without checking current official lists.
- Assuming a completed outline means supplier evidence was verified or a statement was submitted.