スキル nex-ada-web-accessibility
📦
nex-ada-web-accessibility
v1.0 コンテンツリビジョン r1 安全 🌐 ネットワークアクセス
Plan US Web Accessibility Reviews
Teams need legal context when prioritizing web accessibility work. This public guide helps frame ADA exposure, remediation priorities, and documentation drafts for professional review.
対応: Claude Codex Code(CC)
自分のエージェントでインストール
このリクエストをエージェントにコピーしてください。正規の Skill ページとマニフェストが含まれています。
エージェントリクエスト
Review the Skillstore skill "nex-ada-web-accessibility" from https://skillstore.io/skills/nexaiguy-nex-ada-web-accessibility.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/nexaiguy-nex-ada-web-accessibility/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.エージェントは引き続き計画を提示し、セキュリティポリシーで必要な確認を求める必要があります。
エージェントが読めるリソース
AI エージェント、クローラー、スクリプトがページ全体ではなく整理されたコンテキストを必要とする場合は、これらのリンクを使ってください。
テストする
「nex-ada-web-accessibility」を使用しています。 Our checkout has unlabeled inputs and a popup that traps keyboard focus. Suggest a remediation sequence.
期待される結果:
- Address both reported barriers promptly because they may prevent checkout completion.
- Associate visible labels with inputs and verify their accessible names.
- Correct popup focus handling and confirm that keyboard users can close the popup and continue checkout.
- Record manual test evidence before claiming the barriers are resolved.
「nex-ada-web-accessibility」を使用しています。 We manage a municipal portal. What should our accessibility review brief contain?
期待される結果:
- Record the entity type, portal functions, and affected public services.
- Ask counsel to verify Title II applicability and the current compliance deadline against authoritative sources.
- Summarize observed barriers, affected users, responsible teams, and proposed remediation dates.
- Distinguish confirmed test results from assumptions and untested areas.
セキュリティ監査
安全v1 • 2026/11/2 バージョン別レポートを開く
All four static findings are false positives: the URLs are attribution links, and the reconnaissance matches contain ordinary accessibility questions or promotional text. No evidence found of malicious instructions, system reconnaissance, credential access, or data exfiltration in the supplied guide.
1
スキャンされたファイル
82
解析済み行数
0
レビュー項目
0
誤検知を無視
リスク要因
🌐 ネットワークアクセス (2)
最新の完了済み静的・セマンティック監査では、確認済みのセキュリティ検出事項は見つかりませんでした。これは、スキルに副作用がないことを証明するものではありません。
監査者: codex
このレポートを共有・引用
バージョン付き評価レポート、中立的なバッジ、埋め込みカード、引用を共有できます。Skillstore は証拠を報告しますが、この Skill が安全かどうかは判断しません。
レポートリンクをコピー
https://skillstore.io/skills/nexaiguy-nex-ada-web-accessibility/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdownバッジ
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/nexaiguy-nex-ada-web-accessibility?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTMLバッジ
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/nexaiguy-nex-ada-web-accessibility?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/nexaiguy-nex-ada-web-accessibility/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>埋め込みカード
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/nexaiguy-nex-ada-web-accessibility.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>学術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA形式の引用
nexaiguy. (2026). nex-ada-web-accessibility security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version 1.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/nexaiguy-nex-ada-web-accessibility/audits/1BibTeX形式の引用
@techreport{nexaiguy-nexaiguy-nex-ada-web-accessibility-2026,
author = {nexaiguy},
title = {nex-ada-web-accessibility security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/nexaiguy-nex-ada-web-accessibility/audits/1},
note = {Author version 1.0}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "nex-ada-web-accessibility security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "1.0"
type: report
authors:
- name: "nexaiguy"
date-released: "2026-11-02"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/nexaiguy-nex-ada-web-accessibility/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:nexaiguy-nex-ada-web-accessibility:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore スコア
このスコアの理由 証拠の信頼度: 中 55
アーキテクチャ
85
保守性
87
コンテンツ
65
コミュニティ
83
仕様準拠
作成できるもの
Prioritize Storefront Accessibility Work
Use reported checkout and navigation barriers to prepare a remediation discussion that separates technical findings from legal assumptions.
Scope a Municipal Portal Review
Organize accessibility evidence and questions about Title II applicability and current deadlines before consulting authoritative sources.
Prepare Documentation for Counsel
Draft an accessibility statement or demand-letter response outline using verified organizational facts and clearly identified uncertainties.
これらのプロンプトを試す
Identify Initial Review Topics
Use this guide to suggest accessibility review topics for [website type]. Separate technical checks from legal questions and identify missing information.
Prioritize Observed Barriers
Review these observed barriers: [findings]. Suggest WCAG 2.1 AA remediation priorities, user impacts, and verification steps. Do not invent test results.
Draft an Accessibility Statement
Draft an accessibility statement for [organization] using [verified findings], [contact details], and [remediation commitments]. Mark unknowns and require counsel review.
Prepare an Exposure Review Brief
Prepare a counsel-review brief for [organization type], [jurisdiction], [site functions], and [demand-letter allegations]. Separate ADA applicability questions, evidence, remediation options, and unverified deadlines.
ベストプラクティス
- Provide organizational facts, jurisdiction, and observed accessibility evidence before requesting exposure analysis.
- Verify legal requirements and deadlines with current authoritative sources and qualified counsel.
- Validate proposed fixes through manual keyboard testing, assistive technology testing, and appropriate automated checks.
回避
- Treating generated legal explanations as definitive advice or a guarantee against litigation.
- Claiming an automated audit or complete checklist was supplied by this guide.
- Publishing accessibility claims or regulatory deadlines without verifying their accuracy.
よくある質問
Does this skill provide legal advice?
No. The guide explicitly requires counsel review, and generated drafts do not establish legal compliance.
Can this package automatically audit my website?
No audit engine is included. The guide can frame review requests, but actual testing requires separate tools and manual evaluation.
What files and assets are included?
Only SKILL.md is supplied. Scripts, extension source, documentation templates, and a complete 50-point checklist are not included.
Does it cover WCAG 2.2?
The guide focuses on WCAG 2.1 AA. Use additional resources when WCAG 2.2 coverage is required.
Are the legal claims and deadlines verified?
The supplied package contains no supporting legal database or update mechanism. Verify its claims against current authoritative sources.
Can I use this guide with Claude, Codex, or Claude Code?
These tools can use the Markdown guide as context. Platform support does not add the missing scripts, templates, or audit engine.