agent-checkpoint
Plan Recoverable Agent Changes with Checkpoints
Agent changes can leave unwanted edits that are difficult to reverse. This guide explains checkpoint workflows for reviewing and restoring project files with a separately obtained implementation.
自分のエージェントでインストール
このリクエストをエージェントにコピーしてください。正規の Skill ページとマニフェストが含まれています。
Review the Skillstore skill "agent-checkpoint" from https://skillstore.io/skills/nexaiguy-agent-checkpoint.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/nexaiguy-agent-checkpoint/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.エージェントは引き続き計画を提示し、セキュリティポリシーで必要な確認を求める必要があります。
エージェントが読めるリソース
AI エージェント、クローラー、スクリプトがページ全体ではなく整理されたコンテキストを必要とする場合は、これらのリンクを使ってください。
テストする
「agent-checkpoint」を使用しています。 Can this package save a checkpoint before my refactor?
期待される結果:
This package contains only a guide. Obtain and review the separate implementation before saving checkpoints; no checkpoint has been created.
「agent-checkpoint」を使用しています。 Plan recovery for two unintended file deletions without discarding the remaining refactor.
期待される結果:
- Confirm the required files exist in the selected checkpoint.
- Preview restoration limited to those two files.
- Review the preview and approve the restore before execution.
- After execution, verify both files and record the documented undo checkpoint.
「agent-checkpoint」を使用しています。 Will checkpoints protect every project file from disk failure?
期待される結果:
No. The guide describes same-disk checkpoints with capture exclusions. Use an independent backup for disk failure and verify which files are protected.
セキュリティ監査
安全All 20 static findings are false positives: Markdown formatting, documented commands, attribution links, and explanatory text do not establish malicious behavior. No evidence found of prompt injection, credential access, exfiltration, or reconnaissance in the supplied guide. The implementation, hooks, and tests are explicitly absent, so their safety claims cannot be verified.
リスク要因
このレポートを共有・引用
バージョン付き評価レポート、中立的なバッジ、埋め込みカード、引用を共有できます。Skillstore は証拠を報告しますが、この Skill が安全かどうかは判断しません。
レポートリンクをコピー
https://skillstore.io/skills/nexaiguy-agent-checkpoint/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdownバッジ
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/nexaiguy-agent-checkpoint?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTMLバッジ
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/nexaiguy-agent-checkpoint?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/nexaiguy-agent-checkpoint/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>埋め込みカード
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/nexaiguy-agent-checkpoint.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>学術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA形式の引用
nexaiguy. (2026). agent-checkpoint security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version 1.2]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/nexaiguy-agent-checkpoint/audits/1BibTeX形式の引用
@techreport{nexaiguy-nexaiguy-agent-checkpoint-2026,
author = {nexaiguy},
title = {agent-checkpoint security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/nexaiguy-agent-checkpoint/audits/1},
note = {Author version 1.2}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "agent-checkpoint security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "1.2"
type: report
authors:
- name: "nexaiguy"
date-released: "2026-11-02"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/nexaiguy-agent-checkpoint/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:nexaiguy-agent-checkpoint:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore スコア
このスコアの理由 証拠の信頼度: 中作成できるもの
Prepare a refactor recovery plan
Review how to save and compare checkpoints before changing a payments module.
Review migration rollback boundaries
Identify excluded files and independent backup needs before a dependency upgrade or migration.
Evaluate automated checkpoint hooks
Understand the proposed Claude Code hook and list implementation checks before enabling automatic checkpoints.
これらのプロンプトを試す
Explain the documented checkpoint workflow and identify what this guide-only package cannot execute.
Plan checkpoints for my dependency upgrade. Include capture exclusions, backup requirements, and a check that the separate implementation is installed.
Using my supplied difference summary, identify unintended deletions and propose a selective restore dry run. Request approval before changing files.
Evaluate the documented Claude Code hook for our workflow. Separate documented claims from verified behavior and list missing implementation evidence.
ベストプラクティス
- Obtain and audit the separate implementation before relying on checkpoint creation or restore guarantees.
- Review capture exclusions and maintain independent backups for important project data.
- Inspect differences and preview restores before approving changes to project files.
回避
- Treating this guide-only package as an installed checkpoint utility.
- Assuming same-disk checkpoints replace backups or include ignored secrets.
- Restoring an entire project without reviewing the target checkpoint and affected files.