スキル karpathy-guidelines

📦

karpathy-guidelines

Name: karpathy-guidelines
Author: multica-ai

コンテンツリビジョン r1 安全 ⚙️ 外部コマンド🌐 ネットワークアクセス

Write Clearer Code with Focused Guidelines

AI coding work can become overcomplicated, unfocused, or difficult to verify. This skill promotes explicit assumptions, minimal changes, and measurable success criteria.

対応: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 78 ブロンズ

自分のエージェントでインストール

このリクエストをエージェントにコピーしてください。正規の Skill ページとマニフェストが含まれています。

エージェントリクエスト

Review the Skillstore skill "karpathy-guidelines" from https://skillstore.io/skills/multica-ai-karpathy-guidelines.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/multica-ai-karpathy-guidelines/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

エージェントは引き続き計画を提示し、セキュリティポリシーで必要な確認を求める必要があります。

エージェントが読めるリソース

AI エージェント、クローラー、スクリプトがページ全体ではなく整理されたコンテキストを必要とする場合は、これらのリンクを使ってください。

Markdown詳細 GET /skills/multica-ai-karpathy-guidelines.md 署名済み manifest GET /api/skills/multica-ai-karpathy-guidelines/manifest 署名済み lockfile GET /api/skills/multica-ai-karpathy-guidelines/lockfile

テストする

「karpathy-guidelines」を使用しています。 Add email validation to the existing registration flow.

期待される結果:

Assumption: validation should follow the existing form error pattern.
Scope: update the email validation path and its focused tests only.
Success: valid addresses pass, invalid addresses show the expected error, and existing tests remain green.

「karpathy-guidelines」を使用しています。 Refactor the notification service.

期待される結果:

Clarification needed: specify the behavior or maintenance problem the refactor must address.
Preserve current notification behavior and capture it with tests before editing.
Avoid new abstractions unless they remove duplication required by the stated goal.

「karpathy-guidelines」を使用しています。 Fix the duplicate invoice bug.

期待される結果:

First reproduce duplicate creation with a focused failing test.
Trace the smallest execution path that can create the second invoice.
The fix is complete when the reproduction passes and related invoice tests remain green.

セキュリティ監査

安全

v1 • 2026/8/26 バージョン別レポートを開く

All four static findings are false positives caused by documentation text, a Markdown code fence, and an attribution link. No executable commands, network requests, system reconnaissance, or prompt injection attempts were found.

スキャンされたファイル

解析済み行数

レビュー項目

誤検知を無視

リスク要因

⚙️ 外部コマンド (1)

SKILL.md:61-65

🌐 ネットワークアクセス (1)

SKILL.md:9

最新の完了済み静的・セマンティック監査では、確認済みのセキュリティ検出事項は見つかりませんでした。これは、スキルに副作用がないことを証明するものではありません。

監査者: codex

このレポートを共有・引用

バージョン付き評価レポート、中立的なバッジ、埋め込みカード、引用を共有できます。Skillstore は証拠を報告しますが、この Skill が安全かどうかは判断しません。

バージョン別レポートを開く

レポートリンクをコピー

https://skillstore.io/skills/multica-ai-karpathy-guidelines/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdownバッジ

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/multica-ai-karpathy-guidelines/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/multica-ai-karpathy-guidelines?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTMLバッジ

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/multica-ai-karpathy-guidelines?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/multica-ai-karpathy-guidelines/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

埋め込みカード

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/multica-ai-karpathy-guidelines.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

学術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA形式の引用

multica-ai. (2026). karpathy-guidelines security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/multica-ai-karpathy-guidelines/audits/1

BibTeX形式の引用

@techreport{multica-ai-multica-ai-karpathy-guidelines-2026,
  author = {multica-ai},
  title = {karpathy-guidelines security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/multica-ai-karpathy-guidelines/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "karpathy-guidelines security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "multica-ai"
date-released: "2026-08-26"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/multica-ai-karpathy-guidelines/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:multica-ai-karpathy-guidelines:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore スコア

このスコアの理由証拠の信頼度: 中

アーキテクチャ

保守性

コンテンツ

コミュニティ

仕様準拠

作成できるもの

Plan a Focused Implementation

Define assumptions, scope, and verification before changing an existing feature.

Review an AI-Generated Patch

Check whether each change supports the request and avoids unnecessary refactoring.

Clarify a Complex Coding Request

Convert an ambiguous request into explicit decisions and measurable outcomes.

これらのプロンプトを試す

Clarify a Coding Task

Apply the Karpathy Guidelines to this task: {task}. State assumptions, identify ambiguity, and define a simple success criterion before proposing changes.

Create a Minimal Plan

Plan the implementation for {task} in {project_context}. Keep the scope narrow and pair every step with a concrete verification check.

Review Patch Scope

Review this patch description: {patch}. Identify unrelated changes, hidden assumptions, unnecessary abstractions, and missing verification. Recommend only changes required by {request}.

Design a Verified Refactor

For the refactor of {component}, define preserved behavior, pre-change checks, minimal edits, and post-change checks. Surface tradeoffs and reject speculative improvements.

ベストプラクティス

Provide the request, relevant project context, and existing constraints.
Ask for assumptions and verification criteria before implementation begins.
Compare the final changes against the original request line by line.

回避

Do not use the guidelines to avoid reasonable progress on well-defined tasks.
Do not request broad cleanup while claiming the change is narrowly scoped.
Do not treat guideline compliance as a substitute for tests or expert review.

よくある質問

What does this skill change?

It changes the assistant's coding approach by emphasizing assumptions, simplicity, focused edits, and verification.

Does the skill edit code automatically?

No. It provides behavioral guidance that an AI coding assistant applies while completing your request.

Can I use it for code review?

Yes. It helps identify unrelated edits, unnecessary abstractions, hidden assumptions, and weak success criteria.

Is it suitable for large projects?

Yes, when you provide enough context and divide the work into focused, verifiable steps.

Will it prevent every coding mistake?

No. You still need project tests, security checks, domain expertise, and human review.

Why can the approach feel slower?

It asks for clarity and verification before implementation. For trivial tasks, apply the guidance with reasonable judgment.

開発者情報

作成者

multica-ai

ライセンス

MIT

Skillstore リビジョン

バージョンに関する注意

作者はバージョンを宣言していません。

リポジトリ

https://github.com/multica-ai/andrej-karpathy-skills/tree/2c606141936f1eeef17fa3043a72095b4765b9c2/skills/karpathy-guidelines

参照

f1dbc1c1b6e8b1818b478bdfb1edcbf468d75bc0

メンテナンスの新しさ

2026/8/26

利用状況

0 ダウンロード · 0 閲覧

ファイル構成

📄 SKILL.md