better-layout
Improve Responsive Layouts and Reading Order
Interface layouts can lose clarity or clip content when resized, translated, or mirrored. This skill guides focused fixes for grouping, alignment, spacing, and responsive structure.
自分のエージェントでインストール
このリクエストをエージェントにコピーしてください。正規の Skill ページとマニフェストが含まれています。
Review the Skillstore skill "better-layout" from https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-layout.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/jakubkrehel-better-layout/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.エージェントは引き続き計画を提示し、セキュリティポリシーで必要な確認を求める必要があります。
エージェントが読めるリソース
AI エージェント、クローラー、スクリプトがページ全体ではなく整理されたコンテキストを必要とする場合は、これらのリンクを使ってください。
テストする
「better-layout」を使用しています。 A settings form uses identical gaps within and between sections, plus separator lines after every field.
期待される結果:
- Medium: section boundaries are unclear because all spacing is equal.
- Use the existing spacing scale to make gaps between groups at least twice the gaps within each group.
- Remove separators where spacing already communicates the grouping.
- Rendered verification: not verified without browser access.
「better-layout」を使用しています。 A right-to-left interface keeps a floating action on the physical right, while a long translated button label clips.
期待される結果:
- Medium: the floating action does not mirror with the interface.
- Pair physical positioning with matching safe-area insets and add a right-to-left override.
- High when the clipped label blocks an action: allow the button to grow and the action row to wrap.
- Verify the RTL view, expanded labels, supported widths, and 200 percent zoom.
セキュリティ監査
安全All 35 static findings are false positives involving Markdown formatting, CSS examples, or interface layout guidance. The approval terminology governs layout review outcomes, not security adjudication. No evidence found of shell execution, system reconnaissance, data exfiltration, or prompt injection in the reviewed files.
リスク要因
⚙️ 外部コマンド (28)
このレポートを共有・引用
バージョン付き評価レポート、中立的なバッジ、埋め込みカード、引用を共有できます。Skillstore は証拠を報告しますが、この Skill が安全かどうかは判断しません。
レポートリンクをコピー
https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-layout/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdownバッジ
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-layout?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTMLバッジ
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-layout?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jakubkrehel-better-layout/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>埋め込みカード
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/jakubkrehel-better-layout.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>学術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA形式の引用
jakubkrehel. (2026). better-layout security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-layout/audits/1BibTeX形式の引用
@techreport{jakubkrehel-jakubkrehel-better-layout-2026,
author = {jakubkrehel},
title = {better-layout security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-layout/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "better-layout security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "jakubkrehel"
date-released: "2026-10-09"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-layout/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:jakubkrehel-better-layout:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore スコア
このスコアの理由 証拠の信頼度: 中作成できるもの
Repair Responsive Components
Find overflow, clipped actions, and unsuitable breakpoints in components used across different container widths.
Improve Interface Hierarchy
Review grouping, shared edges, control distinction, and primary actions while preserving existing spacing tokens.
Prepare Layouts for Localization
Check long translated labels, wrapping, right-to-left mirroring, and safe-area positioning before a multilingual release.
これらのプロンプトを試す
Review this view for grouping, alignment, and reading order. Identify visible failures and suggest small changes using existing spacing tokens.
Review this component at supported widths and 320 pixels. Find overflow or clipped actions, propose focused fixes, and mark unavailable checks as not verified.
Review this layout with expanded labels, German text, and right-to-left direction. Preserve DOM order and identify clipping, broken mirroring, or missing disclosure cues.
Audit these views using project tokens. Check supported widths, 320 pixels, 200 percent zoom, RTL, sticky headers, and safe areas. Group findings by principle.
ベストプラクティス
- Provide the relevant components, supported widths, and existing spacing or density tokens before requesting a review.
- Require a demonstrable failure and user impact for each finding, rather than treating different spacing values as defects.
- Verify changes with narrow widths, zoom, expanded translations, and RTL; explicitly record checks that could not run.
回避
- Replace established spacing tokens with default measurements without evidence of a layout failure.
- Change visual order independently of DOM order to hide reading-order problems.
- Approve uninspected views or claim browser verification when only source files were reviewed.
よくある質問
What does this skill review?
Which AI tools are supported?
Does it run an automated layout scanner?
Will it replace my design system?
Can it verify layouts without a browser?
Does it provide a complete accessibility audit?
開発者情報
作成者
jakubkrehelライセンス
MIT
Skillstore リビジョン
r1
バージョンに関する注意
作者はバージョンを宣言していません。
参照
e406bf64b5db6e514879399e87b346fa7ff7c2fb
メンテナンスの新しさ
2026/10/11
利用状況
0 ダウンロード · 0 閲覧
ファイル構成