スキル gpt-series-reasoning-style
📦

gpt-series-reasoning-style

v1.6.0 コンテンツリビジョン r6 安全 🌐 ネットワークアクセス📁 ファイルシステムへのアクセス⚙️ 外部コマンド

Verify AI Deliverables with Evidence

AI work can appear complete before the result is opened, tested, or checked against the request. This skill adds staged planning, real-environment verification, and honest completion levels.

対応: Claude Codex Code(CC)
💎 90 注目

自分のエージェントでインストール

このリクエストをエージェントにコピーしてください。正規の Skill ページとマニフェストが含まれています。

エージェントリクエスト
Review the Skillstore skill "gpt-series-reasoning-style" from https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

エージェントは引き続き計画を提示し、セキュリティポリシーで必要な確認を求める必要があります。

エージェントが読めるリソース

AI エージェント、クローラー、スクリプトがページ全体ではなく整理されたコンテキストを必要とする場合は、これらのリンクを使ってください。

Markdown詳細 GET /skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style.md 署名済み manifest GET /api/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/manifest 署名済み lockfile GET /api/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/lockfile

テストする

「gpt-series-reasoning-style」を使用しています。 Build a small dashboard and tell me when it is finished.

期待される結果:

The dashboard is implemented. I opened it in the target environment, checked the main interaction, and verified the displayed totals. Mobile layout and external data refresh remain unverified.

「gpt-series-reasoning-style」を使用しています。 Have two agents research and implement this feature.

期待される結果:

  • Research agent: documented assumptions and acceptance checks.
  • Implementation agent: completed the feature and supplied the changed files.
  • Review: opened the integrated result and checked the critical path.
  • Status: C1 verified; stakeholder approval is still required for C2.

「gpt-series-reasoning-style」を使用しています。 Confirm that this report is correct.

期待される結果:

The report matches the requested structure and its key figures were recalculated. Source freshness and business acceptance were not independently verified.

セキュリティ監査

安全
v6 • 2026/9/20 バージョン別レポートを開く

All 91 static findings were adjudicated as false positives because they reference public metadata, documentation, fixed repository paths, or analysis heuristics rather than executed behavior. No prompt-injection text, data-exfiltration intent, or runtime command execution was evidenced in the reviewed files.

24
スキャンされたファイル
2,119
解析済み行数
0
レビュー項目
0
誤検知を無視

リスク要因

🌐 ネットワークアクセス (12)
.claude-plugin/plugin.json:7 .claude-plugin/plugin.json:8 plugin.json:7 plugin.json:8 README.md:374 README.md:382 README.md:397 README.md:774 README.md:782 README.md:797 REFERENCE.md:308 REFERENCE.md:314
📁 ファイルシステムへのアクセス (41)
.claude-plugin/plugin.json:12 README.md:363 README.md:364 README.md:365 README.md:366 README.md:369 README.md:375 README.md:376 README.md:763 README.md:764 README.md:765 README.md:766 README.md:769 README.md:775 README.md:776 README.md:363 README.md:364 README.md:365 README.md:366 README.md:369 README.md:375 README.md:376 README.md:763 README.md:764 README.md:765 README.md:766 README.md:769 README.md:775 README.md:776 README.md:401 README.md:801 REFERENCE.md:301 REFERENCE.md:302 REFERENCE.md:303 REFERENCE.md:304 REFERENCE.md:309 REFERENCE.md:301 REFERENCE.md:302 REFERENCE.md:303 REFERENCE.md:304 REFERENCE.md:309
⚙️ 外部コマンド (16)
README.md:379 README.md:381 README.md:779 README.md:781 REFERENCE.md:312 REFERENCE.md:313 scripts/selfcheck.py:9-76 scripts/selfcheck.py:76-77 scripts/selfcheck.py:77 SKILL.md:17 SKILL.md:23 SKILL.md:24 SKILL.md:30 SKILL.md:31 SKILL.md:32 SKILL.md:33
最新の完了済み静的・セマンティック監査では、確認済みのセキュリティ検出事項は見つかりませんでした。これは、スキルに副作用がないことを証明するものではありません。
監査者: codex 監査履歴を表示 →
このレポートを共有・引用

バージョン付き評価レポート、中立的なバッジ、埋め込みカード、引用を共有できます。Skillstore は証拠を報告しますが、この Skill が安全かどうかは判断しません。

バージョン別レポートを開く
セキュリティ評価

レポートリンクをコピー

https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/audits/6?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdownバッジ

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTMLバッジ

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

埋め込みカード

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
学術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA形式の引用

jadeyingwah. (2026). gpt-series-reasoning-style security audit report (audit version 6) [Author version 1.6.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/audits/6

BibTeX形式の引用

@techreport{jadeyingwah-jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style-2026, author = {jadeyingwah}, title = {gpt-series-reasoning-style security audit report (audit version 6)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {6}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/audits/6}, note = {Author version 1.6.0} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "gpt-series-reasoning-style security audit report (audit version 6)" version: "1.6.0" type: report authors: - name: "jadeyingwah" date-released: "2026-09-20" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/audits/6" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style:audit:6" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore スコア

このスコアの理由 証拠の信頼度: 中
95
アーキテクチャ
100
保守性
87
コンテンツ
65
コミュニティ
91
仕様準拠

作成できるもの

Review a Code Change

Ask an engineer or coding agent to implement a change, run focused checks, open the result, and report verified and unverified paths.

Coordinate Multiple Agents

Use staged planning and explicit handoffs when several agents divide research, implementation, testing, or review.

Validate a Client Deliverable

Track whether a document, design, or analysis matches the request and distinguish technical completion from stakeholder approval.

これらのプロンプトを試す

Basic Completion Check 
Complete this task, then open the actual result and list what you verified, what remains unverified, and whether the request is complete.
Plan Before Implementation 
Plan this task in clear stages. Identify the required checks and the real environment where the final result must be opened before you implement it.
Audit a Finished Change 
Review this completed change against the original request. Recalculate important numbers, open the output, test the critical path, and mark every unverified claim.
Coordinate an Agent Team 
Break this project into independent agent roles. Define handoff evidence, assign a reviewer, verify the integrated result in its real environment, and report the appropriate C1 or C2 status.

ベストプラクティス

  • Define the evidence required for completion before implementation begins.
  • Open and use the delivered result in the environment that matters.
  • State verified facts, unverified paths, and completion level separately.

回避

  • Do not declare completion from code inspection alone.
  • Do not treat a green check as proof that the guarded failure case works.
  • Do not label a result C2 without user or external confirmation.

よくある質問

What does this skill verify?
It verifies delivery evidence, real-environment use, critical checks, and honest reporting of remaining uncertainty.
Does it run tests automatically?
No. It guides the agent to choose and run relevant checks, but available tools and project tests determine execution.
What is C1?
C1 means the technical delivery was checked with available evidence, while some broader acceptance may remain open.
What is C2?
C2 means the product is satisfactory, which requires user or external confirmation rather than model judgment alone.
Can it coordinate multiple agents?
Yes. It supports role separation, explicit handoffs, review evidence, and integrated-result verification.
Which tools support it?
The skill declares support for Claude, Codex, and Claude Code, plus compatible clients that follow the same skill convention.

開発者情報

作成者

jadeyingwah

ライセンス

MIT

作者バージョン

v1.6.0

Skillstore リビジョン

r6

リポジトリ

https://github.com/jadeyingwah/gpt-series-reasoning-style/tree/a8ee3c963ce3bd97d9e2076d54cd0f3334d45d39/

参照

ca840d3e968d0e2f0cfde9943dd7e35a0878a763

メンテナンスの新しさ

2026/9/20

利用状況

3 ダウンロード · 18 閲覧

ファイル構成

📁 .claude-plugin/

📄 plugin.json

📄 .gitattributes

📁 .github/

📁 workflows/

📄 ci.yml

📄 .gitignore

📄 AGENTS.md

📁 assets/

📄 logo.png

📄 logo.svg

📄 social-preview.png

📄 social-preview.svg

📄 CHANGELOG.md

📄 DISCIPLINE.md

📁 docs/

📄 README.md

📄 LICENSE

📄 plugin.json

📄 README.md

📄 REFERENCE.md

📁 references/

📄 multi-agent.md

📄 plan-rules.md

📄 review-rules.md

📁 scripts/

📄 selfcheck.py

📄 SECURITY.md

📄 SKILL.md

📁 templates/

📄 commander.md

📄 executor.md

📄 reviewer.md

📄 VERSION

関連スキル

すべて表示