Static analysis flagged many external command and network patterns. Review found these are mostly documented belt CLI examples and official documentation links, but the skill intentionally sends user-supplied TSX code to inference.sh for remote rendering. No evidence found of prompt injection, hidden scripts, credential theft, or malicious intent in SKILL.md.
TRUE POSITIVE for network risk. The skill directs users to render TSX component code through inference.sh using the belt CLI. This is intended, but proprietary code, props, URLs, or assets may be processed by a third-party service.
The documentation explicitly names inference.sh and shows belt app run calls that submit a code field for rendering. This confirms the network exposure, while the context shows it is the stated purpose of the skill.
TRUE POSITIVE for external command capability. The skill permits Bash(belt *) and provides belt command examples. The scope is limited to the belt CLI, but marketplace users should know the skill can run external commands that contact a remote service.
The allowed-tools declaration is direct evidence of a scoped CLI command surface. I did not find evidence that it executes arbitrary shell commands outside belt.
FALSE POSITIVE for malicious command execution. The detected shell snippets are fenced examples showing how to use the documented belt render workflow and related skill installs. They are not hidden scripts or automatic execution paths.
The command patterns occur inside markdown code fences and match the skill purpose. No separate executable file or stealth command path exists in the reviewed file set.
Hardcoded URLs Are Documentation and Service References
FALSE POSITIVE for suspicious network destinations. The URLs point to inference.sh, a hosted image, install documentation, and Remotion or inference.sh documentation. No evidence found that secrets are collected or exfiltrated.
The URLs are visible user-facing references, not hidden endpoints. Their placement in descriptions and documentation links supports benign use.
FALSE POSITIVE for weak cryptography. The reviewed lines do not show cryptographic functions, hashing, ciphers, or security-sensitive comparisons. No evidence found of MD5, SHA1, DES, or similar weak algorithms in SKILL.md.
The cited locations are metadata prose and a parameter table header, not code using cryptography. Confidence is high because the only scanned file contains no crypto implementation.