dfam-check
Check Mesh Printability Before You Print
Mesh files often fail during slicing because walls, overhangs, units, or topology were not checked against the selected process. This skill measures those geometry facts locally and turns them into evidence-based DfAM guidance.
自分のエージェントでインストール
このリクエストをエージェントにコピーしてください。正規の Skill ページとマニフェストが含まれています。
Review the Skillstore skill "dfam-check" from https://skillstore.io/skills/earthtojake-dfam-check.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/earthtojake-dfam-check/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.エージェントは引き続き計画を提示し、セキュリティポリシーで必要な確認を求める必要があります。
エージェントが読めるリソース
AI エージェント、クローラー、スクリプトがページ全体ではなく整理されたコンテキストを必要とする場合は、これらのリンクを使ってください。
テストする
「dfam-check」を使用しています。 Check this STL for FDM printing with a 45 degree self-supporting angle.
期待される結果:
- Watertightness: pass. The mesh is suitable for topology review.
- Wall thickness: the sampled fifth percentile is below the FDM supported-wall limit. Thicken the affected region and re-measure.
- Overhangs: report the measured down-facing area below 45 degrees and review orientation candidates.
「dfam-check」を使用しています。 Which orientation should I use for this part?
期待される結果:
The recommended axis-aligned orientation is the candidate with the lowest support area, provided its build height remains acceptable. Treat the support estimate as a cost signal and verify the final choice in a slicer.
「dfam-check」を使用しています。 Can this mesh be evaluated for SLS?
期待される結果:
Yes. Compare wall thickness and feature limits for SLS, but do not apply support-angle findings. Enclosed cavities still require a trapped-powder escape review because this tool does not measure it.
セキュリティ監査
安全All 31 static findings are false positives: 25 external-command matches are Markdown backticks, five blocker matches are ordinary geometry logic, and one network match is a provenance URL. The six reviewed files show local mesh measurement and reporting, with no evidence of unauthorized network access, command execution, or prompt injection.
リスク要因
⚙️ 外部コマンド (25)
🌐 ネットワークアクセス (1)
このレポートを共有・引用
バージョン付き評価レポート、中立的なバッジ、埋め込みカード、引用を共有できます。Skillstore は証拠を報告しますが、この Skill が安全かどうかは判断しません。
レポートリンクをコピー
https://skillstore.io/skills/earthtojake-dfam-check/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdownバッジ
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/earthtojake-dfam-check?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTMLバッジ
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/earthtojake-dfam-check?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/earthtojake-dfam-check/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>埋め込みカード
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/earthtojake-dfam-check.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>学術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA形式の引用
earthtojake. (2026). dfam-check security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/earthtojake-dfam-check/audits/1BibTeX形式の引用
@techreport{earthtojake-earthtojake-dfam-check-2026,
author = {earthtojake},
title = {dfam-check security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/earthtojake-dfam-check/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "dfam-check security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "earthtojake"
date-released: "2026-09-08"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/earthtojake-dfam-check/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:earthtojake-dfam-check:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore スコア
このスコアの理由 証拠の信頼度: 中作成できるもの
Validate a prototype mesh
Check walls, overhangs, scale, and watertightness before sending a prototype to a print service.
Compare manufacturing processes
Evaluate one mesh against candidate process limits and identify which measurements need process-specific data.
Prepare a redesign review
Use measured failures and orientation tradeoffs to create concrete geometry changes before CAD regeneration.
これらのプロンプトを試す
Check the attached mesh for printability. Ask for the target process if it is missing, then report the measured geometry facts and the main risks.
Compare this mesh for FDM, SLS, SLA/DLP, metal PBF, and MJF. Use the process limits reference, separate measured results from missing checks, and explain the strongest constraints.
Measure the mesh with the target process angle, then evaluate candidate orientations. Recommend the best option using support area and build height, with the tradeoff stated clearly.
Create a prioritized redesign brief from the measured DfAM failures. Include the evidence field, target dimensions or angles, uncertainty, and the re-measurement step after CAD regeneration.
ベストプラクティス
- Provide the target process, material, layer height, and machine datasheet when available.
- Measure the exact uploaded mesh and cite both the measured field and the selected process limit.
- Confirm units when the scale check reports a suspiciously small bounding-box diagonal.
回避
- Do not infer printability from a render, generator script, or triangle count.
- Do not silently rescale geometry or treat a sampled minimum as exhaustive proof.
- Do not apply support-angle findings to powder processes or present support volume as slicer accuracy.
よくある質問
Which mesh formats are supported?
Does the skill run a slicer?
Which printing processes are covered?
How reliable is wall thickness?
Can it recommend an orientation?
What does a need-more-information result mean?
開発者情報
作成者
earthtojakeライセンス
MIT
Skillstore リビジョン
r1
バージョンに関する注意
作者はバージョンを宣言していません。
参照
d9e5ab86dafd32a1ddde9b8b4fde177589b55b95
メンテナンスの新しさ
2026/9/8
利用状況
1 ダウンロード · 0 閲覧