スキル invoking-agents
📦
invoking-agents
コンテンツリビジョン r1 高リスク ⚙️ 外部コマンド🌐 ネットワークアクセス📁 ファイルシステムへのアクセス
Orchestrate Issues Through Review and QA
Multi-agent issue delivery can lose state, mix roles, and skip safeguards. This skill coordinates implementation, review, QA, escalation, and pull request creation through agent-flow.
対応: Claude Codex Code(CC)
インストール前に停止して確認を求めてください。
計画を確認し、ファイルを変更する前にユーザーの明示的な同意を得てください。
自分のエージェントでインストール
このリクエストをエージェントにコピーしてください。正規の Skill ページとマニフェストが含まれています。
エージェントリクエスト
Review the Skillstore skill "invoking-agents" from https://skillstore.io/skills/drix10-invoking-agents.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/drix10-invoking-agents/manifest. Verify the artifact. Stop and obtain explicit user consent before installing or changing files.エージェントは引き続き計画を提示し、セキュリティポリシーで必要な確認を求める必要があります。
エージェントが読めるリソース
AI エージェント、クローラー、スクリプトがページ全体ではなく整理されたコンテキストを必要とする場合は、これらのリンクを使ってください。
テストする
「invoking-agents」を使用しています。 Implement issue #42 and open a pull request.
期待される結果:
Issue #42 completed. Implementation, review, and QA passed. Pull request #108 was opened from the issue branch.
「invoking-agents」を使用しています。 Run issue #57 through the pipeline.
期待される結果:
Issue #57 needs a human decision because the acceptance criteria conflict. The decision brief includes the exact ambiguity and attempted resolution.
「invoking-agents」を使用しています。 Process issues #60 and #61 in parallel.
期待される結果:
- Issue #60 started in its own worktree.
- Issue #61 was serialized because both classifications include the same file.
セキュリティ監査
高リスクv1 • 2026/9/27 バージョン別レポートを開く
The 81 static alerts are false positives caused by Markdown formatting, safe documentation references, or fixed workflow checks. Two semantic risks remain: unconfined implementer processes and unsafe shell interpolation of an untrusted issue title.
1
スキャンされたファイル
200
解析済み行数
0
レビュー項目
0
誤検知を無視
確認済みのセキュリティ上の懸念 (2)
高
Unconfined Implementer Processes
Claude and Codex implementers run without enforced worktree confinement while processing untrusted issue content. Environment variables and prompts are advisory, so a compromised agent could modify files outside the worktree.
The skill explicitly states that Claude and Codex lack worktree confinement and recommends an external container or sandbox. Their launch commands do not enforce that boundary.
高
Untrusted Issue Title Interpolated Into Shell Command
The pull request command places the untrusted issue title inside a double-quoted shell argument. Shell substitutions within a title could execute unless the value is escaped or passed without shell parsing.
The skill declares issue text untrusted, then shows the issue title substituted into a shell command. Double quotes do not suppress shell command substitution.
リスク要因
⚙️ 外部コマンド (50)
SKILL.md:12 SKILL.md:13 SKILL.md:14 SKILL.md:17 SKILL.md:24 SKILL.md:25 SKILL.md:27 SKILL.md:29 SKILL.md:31-35 SKILL.md:35-37 SKILL.md:37-41 SKILL.md:41 SKILL.md:42 SKILL.md:43-49 SKILL.md:49-54 SKILL.md:54-58 SKILL.md:58-63 SKILL.md:63-67 SKILL.md:67-72 SKILL.md:72-74 SKILL.md:74 SKILL.md:76 SKILL.md:78 SKILL.md:82 SKILL.md:84 SKILL.md:85 SKILL.md:89-91 SKILL.md:91-93 SKILL.md:93 SKILL.md:97 SKILL.md:99-103 SKILL.md:103-105 SKILL.md:105 SKILL.md:107-111 SKILL.md:111-113 SKILL.md:113 SKILL.md:115-117 SKILL.md:117-121 SKILL.md:121-123 SKILL.md:123 SKILL.md:125 SKILL.md:131-132 SKILL.md:132 SKILL.md:133-134 SKILL.md:134-137 SKILL.md:137 SKILL.md:141-147 SKILL.md:147-149 SKILL.md:149-151 SKILL.md:151-152
🌐 ネットワークアクセス (1)
📁 ファイルシステムへのアクセス (6)
監査者: codex
このレポートを共有・引用
バージョン付き評価レポート、中立的なバッジ、埋め込みカード、引用を共有できます。Skillstore は証拠を報告しますが、この Skill が安全かどうかは判断しません。
レポートリンクをコピー
https://skillstore.io/skills/drix10-invoking-agents/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdownバッジ
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/drix10-invoking-agents?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTMLバッジ
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/drix10-invoking-agents?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/drix10-invoking-agents/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>埋め込みカード
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/drix10-invoking-agents.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>学術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA形式の引用
drix10. (2026). invoking-agents security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/drix10-invoking-agents/audits/1BibTeX形式の引用
@techreport{drix10-drix10-invoking-agents-2026,
author = {drix10},
title = {invoking-agents security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/drix10-invoking-agents/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "invoking-agents security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "drix10"
date-released: "2026-09-27"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/drix10-invoking-agents/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:drix10-invoking-agents:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore スコア
このスコアの理由 証拠の信頼度: 中 55
アーキテクチャ
85
保守性
87
コンテンツ
65
コミュニティ
83
仕様準拠
作成できるもの
Deliver a GitHub Issue
Run one tracked issue through implementation, independent review, QA, and pull request creation.
Process a Local Work Item
Use acceptance criteria from local issue files when a GitHub issue is unavailable.
Enforce Review Separation
Keep implementation, review, and QA in separate processes with file-based evidence and bounded review rounds.
これらのプロンプトを試す
Run One Issue
Implement issue #{issue_number} through the full agent-flow pipeline and open a pull request.Use Local Acceptance Criteria
Process the work item in {issue_file} as issue {issue_number}, then implement, review, test, and prepare a pull request.Resume an Escalated Issue
Resume issue #{issue_number} after this decision: {decision}. Preserve existing artifacts and continue from the recorded state.Coordinate Parallel Issues
Classify issues {issue_numbers}, identify overlapping files, run independent worktrees in parallel, and serialize any conflicting changes.ベストプラクティス
- Provide testable acceptance criteria before starting the pipeline.
- Use enforced containers or sandboxes for every agent that can edit or execute commands.
- Review escalation briefs and critical draft pull requests before continuing.
回避
- Do not combine implementer, reviewer, and QA responsibilities in one agent context.
- Do not bypass protected-path checks, review-round limits, or required human approval.
- Do not interpolate issue text directly into shell commands.
よくある質問
Which issue sources are supported?
The skill accepts inline criteria, GitHub issues through gh, and local ISSUES.md or .agent-issues.json files.
Does it implement changes itself?
No. It coordinates separate implementer, reviewer, and QA processes and exchanges artifacts between them.
When does it request human input?
It escalates missing specifications, architecture decisions, protected-path changes, critical changes, repeated failures, and unavailable GitHub operations.
Can it create pull requests?
Yes. It pushes the issue branch and uses gh after implementation, review, and QA complete.
Does it support parallel issues?
Yes. Independent issues can use separate worktrees, but issues touching the same files should run sequentially.
Is worktree confinement automatic?
Only some harnesses enforce it. Claude and Codex implementers require an external container or sandbox for a hard boundary.