スキル cold-email-subject-lines
📦
cold-email-subject-lines
コンテンツリビジョン r1 安全 ⚙️ 外部コマンド🌐 ネットワークアクセス
Write Clear Cold Email Subject Lines
Generic subject lines can obscure a relevant outreach message. This skill drafts and critiques concise alternatives using four frameworks and audience-specific notes.
対応: Claude Codex Code(CC)
自分のエージェントでインストール
このリクエストをエージェントにコピーしてください。正規の Skill ページとマニフェストが含まれています。
エージェントリクエスト
Review the Skillstore skill "cold-email-subject-lines" from https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-subject-lines.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-subject-lines/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.エージェントは引き続き計画を提示し、セキュリティポリシーで必要な確認を求める必要があります。
エージェントが読めるリソース
AI エージェント、クローラー、スクリプトがページ全体ではなく整理されたコンテキストを必要とする場合は、これらのリンクを使ってください。
テストする
「cold-email-subject-lines」を使用しています。 Suggest subjects for operations leaders about an approval-tracking service. The email asks for a short meeting and provides no customer results.
期待される結果:
- Pain: Approval delays slowing your team? Notes: Focuses on the stated operational problem.
- Curiosity: A different approach to approval tracking. Notes: Introduces the offer without claiming measured results.
- Direct: Discuss approval tracking next week? Notes: Makes the meeting request explicit.
「cold-email-subject-lines」を使用しています。 Critique this subject for a first outreach email: Re: GUARANTEED RESULTS FOR YOUR TEAM TODAY
期待される結果:
- Issues: The fake reply prefix suggests a prior conversation. All capitals and guaranteed results weaken credibility.
- Alternative: A question about your approval process. Reason: Connects to a specific topic without unsupported promises.
- Alternative: Discuss your approval workflow? Reason: States a clear, relevant request.
- Spam check: The referenced trigger list is unavailable, so a complete list-based check was not performed.
セキュリティ監査
安全v1 • 2026/10/3 バージョン別レポートを開く
All 13 static findings are false positives: Markdown formatting accounts for the execution flags, and the URL is a passive reference link. No evidence found of command execution, unauthorized data transmission, or prompt injection in SKILL.md. Referenced supporting materials are absent from the supplied package, limiting spam checks and performance claims.
1
スキャンされたファイル
104
解析済み行数
0
レビュー項目
0
誤検知を無視
リスク要因
⚙️ 外部コマンド (12)
🌐 ネットワークアクセス (1)
最新の完了済み静的・セマンティック監査では、確認済みのセキュリティ検出事項は見つかりませんでした。これは、スキルに副作用がないことを証明するものではありません。
監査者: codex
このレポートを共有・引用
バージョン付き評価レポート、中立的なバッジ、埋め込みカード、引用を共有できます。Skillstore は証拠を報告しますが、この Skill が安全かどうかは判断しません。
レポートリンクをコピー
https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-subject-lines/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdownバッジ
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-subject-lines?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTMLバッジ
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-subject-lines?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-subject-lines/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>埋め込みカード
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-subject-lines.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>学術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA形式の引用
cmj-hub. (2026). cold-email-subject-lines security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-subject-lines/audits/1BibTeX形式の引用
@techreport{cmj-hub-cmj-hub-cold-email-subject-lines-2026,
author = {cmj-hub},
title = {cold-email-subject-lines security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-subject-lines/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "cold-email-subject-lines security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "cmj-hub"
date-released: "2026-10-03"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-subject-lines/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:cmj-hub-cold-email-subject-lines:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore スコア
このスコアの理由 証拠の信頼度: 中 55
アーキテクチャ
85
保守性
87
コンテンツ
65
コミュニティ
83
仕様準拠
作成できるもの
Prepare Sales Outreach
Generate subjects for a defined prospect audience, value proposition, and meeting request.
Review Campaign Subjects
Critique draft subjects for length, relevance, deceptive prefixes, and unsupported claims before selecting test candidates.
Refine Founder Outreach
Create concise subjects for prospective customers using a clear offer without inventing customer results.
これらのプロンプトを試す
Draft Your First Subjects
Suggest five subjects for [audience] about [offer]. Use at least two frameworks, keep each under eight words, and explain the fit.
Improve an Existing Subject
Critique [subject] for [audience]. Flag length, relevance, clickbait, and fake reply prefixes. Suggest three alternatives using only the facts in [email draft].
Match the Outreach Context
Audience: [audience]. Value proposition: [value]. Goal: [open, reply, or book]. Relationship: [relationship]. Rank five subjects across multiple frameworks with fit notes.
Prepare Framework Test Candidates
Using [draft] and [verified evidence], propose five subjects across all four frameworks. Explain fit and tradeoffs. Do not invent results. Note unavailable spam references.
ベストプラクティス
- Provide the audience, value proposition, outreach goal, and recipient relationship before requesting suggestions.
- Use only verified customer evidence and authentic personalization in social-proof subjects.
- Provide the spam-trigger reference when available, then test candidates using your own campaign measurements.
回避
- Inventing customer results, recipient details, or previous conversations to make a subject more persuasive.
- Using all capitals, emojis, clickbait, or fake Re: and Fwd: prefixes.
- Treating qualitative rankings as measured reply rates or guaranteed delivery outcomes.
よくある質問
Which subject-line frameworks does the skill use?
It uses pain, curiosity, social proof, and direct frameworks. Suggestions normally span at least two families.
What information should I provide?
Provide your audience, value proposition, desired action, and recipient relationship. An email draft can supply additional context.
Can it critique an existing subject?
Yes. It identifies issues and suggests alternatives with reasons for each change.
Does it check for spam-trigger words?
It requests checks against a referenced local list. That list is absent from this package, so complete list-based checking requires additional material.
Does it guarantee higher reply rates?
No. It provides qualitative fit notes, not measured predictions. The externally cited performance PDF is not included.
Does the skill send emails or contact the linked service?
No. It provides writing guidance and a reference link, without instructions to send emails or automatically contact the external service.