cold-email-list-quality
Score and Clean Prospect Lists
Duplicates, stale signals, and targeting mismatches waste outreach capacity. This skill guides CSV or JSONL list reviews with a weighted rubric, removal reasons, and prioritized cleanup recommendations.
自分のエージェントでインストール
このリクエストをエージェントにコピーしてください。正規の Skill ページとマニフェストが含まれています。
Review the Skillstore skill "cold-email-list-quality" from https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-list-quality.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-list-quality/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.エージェントは引き続き計画を提示し、セキュリティポリシーで必要な確認を求める必要があります。
エージェントが読めるリソース
AI エージェント、クローラー、スクリプトがページ全体ではなく整理されたコンテキストを必要とする場合は、これらのリンクを使ってください。
テストする
「cold-email-list-quality」を使用しています。 Illustrative review: a list includes duplicate emails, signals older than 30 days, and prospects outside configured role targets.
期待される結果:
- Illustrative score: 72/100. Deduplication: 16/20; role fit: 18/25; freshness: 10/20; address heuristics: 12/15; exclusions: 8/10; company stage: 8/10.
- Keep the oldest record for each duplicate email. Review near-duplicates manually.
- Refresh stale signals and review prospects outside role targets before import. Mailbox deliverability remains unverified.
「cold-email-list-quality」を使用しています。 Illustrative review: ICP rules target revenue leaders at Series A or Series B companies; rows include role accounts and plus-addresses.
期待される結果:
- Flag role-account addresses for removal under the documented B2B heuristic.
- Warn on plus-addresses without claiming they are invalid mailboxes.
- Compare inferred funding stages and revenue roles with the configured targets. Report uncertain company stages for review.
セキュリティ監査
安全All 31 static findings are false positives: Markdown delimiters, fixed repository-relative paths, and list-quality terminology do not demonstrate the detected threats. No evidence found of credential theft, data exfiltration, prompt injection, or reconnaissance in the reviewed skill. The documented Python script is absent, so its execution safety cannot be assessed.
リスク要因
⚙️ 外部コマンド (26)
📁 ファイルシステムへのアクセス (3)
このレポートを共有・引用
バージョン付き評価レポート、中立的なバッジ、埋め込みカード、引用を共有できます。Skillstore は証拠を報告しますが、この Skill が安全かどうかは判断しません。
レポートリンクをコピー
https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-list-quality/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdownバッジ
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-list-quality?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTMLバッジ
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-list-quality?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-list-quality/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>埋め込みカード
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-list-quality.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>学術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA形式の引用
cmj-hub. (2026). cold-email-list-quality security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-list-quality/audits/1BibTeX形式の引用
@techreport{cmj-hub-cmj-hub-cold-email-list-quality-2026,
author = {cmj-hub},
title = {cold-email-list-quality security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-list-quality/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "cold-email-list-quality security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "cmj-hub"
date-released: "2026-10-03"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-list-quality/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:cmj-hub-cold-email-list-quality:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore スコア
このスコアの理由 証拠の信頼度: 中作成できるもの
Prepare a New Prospect List
Review an imported CSV or JSONL list for duplicates, address concerns, and records outside campaign requirements.
Refresh Weekly Outreach Data
Review signal age, role fit, exclusions, and company stage before refreshing the weekly campaign list.
Audit ICP Alignment
Compare supplied prospects with ideal customer profile rules and prioritize changes to targeting or list sourcing.
これらのプロンプトを試す
Review prospects.csv using the documented quality rubric. Report axis scores, removal candidates, and top fixes. State missing fields and avoid assuming mailbox deliverability.
Review prospects.csv for duplicate emails, LinkedIn URLs, and person-company matches. Keep the oldest email record and newest LinkedIn signal. Flag near-duplicates for review.
Score prospects.csv against brand-config.json. Check roles, exclusions, signal dates, address heuristics, and inferred company stages. Explain assumptions and separate warnings from removal recommendations.
Audit prospects.jsonl using brand-config.json and supplied warm-up status. Report scores, cleanup priorities, and send-volume arithmetic. Preserve the original. Write reviewed cleaned and removed CSV files.
ベストプラクティス
- Provide current ICP configuration, dated signals, and complete prospect fields; identify missing information before accepting scores.
- Preserve the original list and review removal reasons and output destinations before writing cleaned files.
- Confirm mailbox deliverability separately and refresh stale signals before campaign import.
回避
- Treating a high quality score as proof of deliverability or permission to contact prospects.
- Executing the documented Python example when the referenced scoring script is absent.
- Automatically deleting near-duplicates or treating plus-address warnings as proof of invalid mailboxes.