スキル cold-email-audit
📦
cold-email-audit
コンテンツリビジョン r1 安全 ⚙️ 外部コマンド🌐 ネットワークアクセス📁 ファイルシステムへのアクセス
Audit Your B2B Cold Email Program
Weak outbound results can originate from infrastructure, targeting, messaging, or operations. This workflow organizes evidence and, with its referenced rubric, ranks improvements in a 90-day plan.
対応: Claude Codex Code(CC)
自分のエージェントでインストール
このリクエストをエージェントにコピーしてください。正規の Skill ページとマニフェストが含まれています。
エージェントリクエスト
Review the Skillstore skill "cold-email-audit" from https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-audit.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-audit/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.エージェントは引き続き計画を提示し、セキュリティポリシーで必要な確認を求める必要があります。
エージェントが読めるリソース
AI エージェント、クローラー、スクリプトがページ全体ではなく整理されたコンテキストを必要とする場合は、これらのリンクを使ってください。
テストする
「cold-email-audit」を使用しています。 We have not documented our sending setup, and our reply process is unclear. Start an outbound audit.
期待される結果:
- Infrastructure: share sending domains, provider, warm-up history, daily limits, and SPF, DKIM, and DMARC status.
- Targeting: share your ideal customer definition, pain signals, list source, list size, send volume, and baseline response rate.
- Messaging: share your opener, subject lines, sequence cadence, and personalization approach.
- Operations: identify reply ownership, response targets, booking process, sales handoff, and reporting cadence.
- Scoring remains pending until your answers and the required rubric are available.
「cold-email-audit」を使用しています。 Our completed rubric gives infrastructure 4/8, targeting 6/8, messaging 5/8, and operations 3/6. Authentication, segmentation, and reply ownership need work.
期待される結果:
- Overall score: 60/100, grade C, from 18 earned points out of 30.
- Top priorities: resolve authentication gaps, improve segmentation, and assign reply ownership.
- Days 1-14: infrastructure owner resolves authentication gaps; verify the configured records.
- Days 15-45: campaign owner improves segmentation; compare response rates against the baseline.
- Days 46-90: sales operations owner establishes reply ownership; track response time against the agreed target.
セキュリティ監査
安全v1 • 2026/10/3 バージョン別レポートを開く
All 13 static findings are false positives involving Markdown formatting, reference navigation, a resource link, and ordinary audit prose. No evidence found of command execution, unauthorized data transfer, system reconnaissance, or prompt injection in the reviewed file. The required scoring rubric is not included in the reviewed package, limiting reproducible scoring.
1
スキャンされたファイル
152
解析済み行数
0
レビュー項目
0
誤検知を無視
リスク要因
⚙️ 外部コマンド (9)
🌐 ネットワークアクセス (1)
📁 ファイルシステムへのアクセス (1)
最新の完了済み静的・セマンティック監査では、確認済みのセキュリティ検出事項は見つかりませんでした。これは、スキルに副作用がないことを証明するものではありません。
監査者: codex
このレポートを共有・引用
バージョン付き評価レポート、中立的なバッジ、埋め込みカード、引用を共有できます。Skillstore は証拠を報告しますが、この Skill が安全かどうかは判断しません。
レポートリンクをコピー
https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-audit/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdownバッジ
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-audit?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTMLバッジ
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-audit?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-audit/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>埋め込みカード
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-audit.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>学術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA形式の引用
cmj-hub. (2026). cold-email-audit security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-audit/audits/1BibTeX形式の引用
@techreport{cmj-hub-cmj-hub-cold-email-audit-2026,
author = {cmj-hub},
title = {cold-email-audit security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-audit/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "cold-email-audit security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "cmj-hub"
date-released: "2026-10-03"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-audit/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:cmj-hub-cold-email-audit:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore スコア
このスコアの理由 証拠の信頼度: 中 55
アーキテクチャ
85
保守性
87
コンテンツ
65
コミュニティ
83
仕様準拠
作成できるもの
Prioritize outbound improvements
Review a startup outbound program and identify three practical priorities before increasing campaign spending.
Assess a client program
Gather client intake answers and prepare an evidence-based review with a phased improvement plan.
Review operational readiness
Assess reply handling, booking, sales handoffs, and reporting alongside targeting and messaging.
これらのプロンプトを試す
Start an outbound audit
Audit our B2B cold email program. Ask for infrastructure, targeting, messaging, and operations context in one intake message before scoring.
Review supplied intake answers
Review these intake answers: [answers]. Identify missing evidence and unavailable references before assigning any scores.
Score and prioritize improvements
Use this audit rubric: [rubric] and these program details: [details]. Score each point and dimension, normalize the total, and rank three improvements.
Build an accountable improvement plan
Use this completed audit: [audit] and these constraints: [constraints]. Assign owners and verification metrics across days 1-14, 15-45, and 46-90.
ベストプラクティス
- Supply complete intake answers and the actual scoring rubric before requesting a numeric grade.
- Share aggregate metrics and sanitized email samples instead of credentials or unnecessary personal data.
- Prioritize infrastructure fixes and give each improvement an owner and a measurable verification target.
回避
- Inventing missing rubric criteria or treating unanswered questions as verified evidence.
- Scaling send volume before resolving known infrastructure and deliverability problems.
- Treating an audit score as proof of legal compliance or guaranteed campaign performance.
よくある質問
Which tools are supported?
The report lists Claude, Codex, and Claude Code. The skill source expects activation through the parent cold-email skill.
What does the audit cover?
It covers infrastructure, targeting, messaging, and operations, with 8, 8, 8, and 6 available points respectively.
How is the overall score calculated?
Divide earned points by 30 and multiply by 100. Individual rubric points receive 0, 0.5, or 1.
Is the complete scoring rubric included?
No. The reviewed package contains only SKILL.md and references a separate rubric and framework that must be supplied.
Does it test DNS settings or send emails?
No automated tests or sending actions are defined. The workflow evaluates supplied context and produces recommendations.
What does the final report contain?
It contains an overall score, dimension results, three ranked priorities, and a 90-day plan. Point-by-point detail is optional.