citation-record
Record Observed Citations for Buyer Questions
Guessed citation lists do not show which names an answer actually attached. This skill structures observed names, a date, and a method around one buyer question.
自分のエージェントでインストール
このリクエストをエージェントにコピーしてください。正規の Skill ページとマニフェストが含まれています。
Review the Skillstore skill "citation-record" from https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-citation-record.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/cmj-hub-citation-record/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.エージェントは引き続き計画を提示し、セキュリティポリシーで必要な確認を求める必要があります。
エージェントが読めるリソース
AI エージェント、クローラー、スクリプトがページ全体ではなく整理されたコンテキストを必要とする場合は、これらのリンクを使ってください。
テストする
「citation-record」を使用しています。 Question: Which invoicing tools suit freelancers? Observed names: LedgerKit and InvoiceDesk. Date: 2026-10-02. Method: manual review of the saved answer.
期待される結果:
- Buyer question: Which invoicing tools suit freelancers?
- Observed names: LedgerKit; InvoiceDesk.
- Observation date: 2026-10-02.
- Method: Manual review of the saved answer.
- Validation: Not run; the scoring script is not included.
「citation-record」を使用しています。 Question: Which help desk fits a small team? Observed name: HelpQueue. Additional guessed name: SupportNest. Date: missing. Method: manual transcript review.
期待される結果:
- Buyer question: Which help desk fits a small team?
- Observed name: HelpQueue.
- Excluded name: SupportNest was guessed, not observed.
- Observation date: Missing; required to complete the record.
- Method: Manual transcript review.
セキュリティ監査
安全The external-command finding is retained because SKILL.md explicitly requests execution of a Python script absent from the supplied package. No evidence found of malicious intent, data exfiltration, or prompt injection; the requested script behavior cannot be verified.
機能レビュー項目 (1)
これらは、このスキルに期待される可能性のある実際のローカル機能であるため、レビューが必要ですが、確認済みの悪意ある動作としてはカウントされません。
リスク要因
⚙️ 外部コマンド (1)
このレポートを共有・引用
バージョン付き評価レポート、中立的なバッジ、埋め込みカード、引用を共有できます。Skillstore は証拠を報告しますが、この Skill が安全かどうかは判断しません。
レポートリンクをコピー
https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-citation-record/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdownバッジ
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-citation-record?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTMLバッジ
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-citation-record?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/cmj-hub-citation-record/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>埋め込みカード
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/cmj-hub-citation-record.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>学術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA形式の引用
cmj-hub. (2026). citation-record security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-citation-record/audits/1BibTeX形式の引用
@techreport{cmj-hub-cmj-hub-citation-record-2026,
author = {cmj-hub},
title = {citation-record security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-citation-record/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "citation-record security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "cmj-hub"
date-released: "2026-10-03"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-citation-record/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:cmj-hub-citation-record:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore スコア
このスコアの理由 証拠の信頼度: 中作成できるもの
Document Buyer Research
Capture the names attached to an observed answer for a specific purchasing question.
Track Brand Mentions
Record whether a brand appeared in one buyer answer, with the observation date and method.
Preserve Review Evidence
Create a concise record of observed names for an answer being reviewed, without adding assumed citations.
これらのプロンプトを試す
Record this buyer question: [question]. Observed names: [names]. Date: [date]. Method: [method]. Use only these observations.
For [buyer question], review this supplied answer: [answer]. Record only attached names, using observation date [date] and method [method].
Review this citation draft: [draft]. Keep one buyer question, distinguish observed from guessed names, and identify missing dates or methods.
Revise [draft] using [validation feedback] and [observed answer]. Preserve the question, date, and method; remove unsupported names and report unresolved issues.
ベストプラクティス
- Keep the buyer question unchanged while creating and revising its record.
- Provide the observed answer, observation date, and method before drafting.
- Review any scoring script before execution and report unavailable validation honestly.
回避
- Adding familiar brands or sources that were not observed in the answer.
- Combining several buyer questions into one citation record.
- Claiming successful validation when the scoring script is unavailable or has not run.