スキル fact-check-x-complete

📦

fact-check-x-complete

Name: fact-check-x-complete
Author: asi2030

v1.1.5 コンテンツリビジョン r1 高リスク 🌐 ネットワークアクセス🔑 環境変数📁 ファイルシステムへのアクセス⚙️ 外部コマンド⚡ スクリプトを含む

Verify AI Answers Across Multiple Platforms

AI platforms can provide conflicting claims and uneven citations. This skill captures their answers, compares facts, and produces traceable verification reports.

対応: Claude Codex Code(CC)

⚠️ 38 不十分

インストール前に停止して確認を求めてください。

計画を確認し、ファイルを変更する前にユーザーの明示的な同意を得てください。

自分のエージェントでインストール

このリクエストをエージェントにコピーしてください。正規の Skill ページとマニフェストが含まれています。

エージェントリクエスト

Review the Skillstore skill "fact-check-x-complete" from https://skillstore.io/skills/asi2030-fact-check-x-complete.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/asi2030-fact-check-x-complete/manifest. Verify the artifact. Stop and obtain explicit user consent before installing or changing files.

エージェントは引き続き計画を提示し、セキュリティポリシーで必要な確認を求める必要があります。

エージェントが読めるリソース

AI エージェント、クローラー、スクリプトがページ全体ではなく整理されたコンテキストを必要とする場合は、これらのリンクを使ってください。

Markdown詳細 GET /skills/asi2030-fact-check-x-complete.md 署名済み manifest GET /api/skills/asi2030-fact-check-x-complete/manifest 署名済み lockfile GET /api/skills/asi2030-fact-check-x-complete/lockfile

テストする

「fact-check-x-complete」を使用しています。 Compare two platforms on a housing policy question and stop after claim comparison.

期待される結果:

A capture report preserves both answers and citations. A comparison report separates shared claims, conflicting figures, and missing evidence.

「fact-check-x-complete」を使用しています。 Complete an authoritative verification for several disputed claims.

期待される結果:

A verified answer includes only claims supported by authoritative evidence.
Unresolved claims appear in a separate evidence-gap section.
A final report compares platform coverage, citation quality, and verified outcomes.

セキュリティ監査

高リスク

v1 • 2026/8/27 バージョン別レポートを開く

Most static matches are benign test fixtures, documentation, fixed-argument subprocesses, report templates, and standard integrity data. Confirmed issues include unrestricted trusted-search endpoint overrides that can redirect an API key, declared third-party query transmission, and indirect prompt-injection exposure when the host interprets captured content. Static review was capped at 400/947 representative findings; omitted static matches are unconfirmed, so automatic publishing stays disabled until manual review.

スキャンされたファイル

15,362

解析済み行数

レビュー項目

誤検知を無視

確認済みのセキュリティ上の懸念 (1)

高

SKILL.md:174-178 SKILL.md:219-221

Indirect Prompt Injection Exposure in Collected Content

The workflow directs the host agent to interpret captured platform answers and external evidence, then write analysis files. It does not define those materials as untrusted data or instruct the agent to ignore embedded commands, so malicious content could influence analysis and subsequent tool use.

The cited workflow explicitly assigns semantic interpretation of captured answers and retrieved evidence to the host agent. The complete skill instructions contain no untrusted-content or embedded-instruction boundary.

機能レビュー項目 (9)

これらは、このスキルに期待される可能性のある実際のローカル機能であるため、レビューが必要ですが、確認済みの悪意ある動作としてはカウントされません。

中

modules/fact-check-x-authoritative-verify/scripts/authority_verify.py:110

getenv function call

endpoint = os.getenv("FACTCHECK_TRUSTED_SEARCH_URL", "https://open.dknowc.cn/dependable/search").str

The configured endpoint is used for requests carrying the trusted-search API key, but the value is not restricted to HTTPS or an approved host. A redirected endpoint could receive the credential and query.

中

scripts/trusted_search_config.py:115

getenv function call

endpoint = os.getenv("FACTCHECK_TRUSTED_SEARCH_URL", DEFAULT_ENDPOINT).strip()

The validation endpoint can be replaced without scheme or host restrictions before the API key is transmitted. A hostile configured endpoint could collect the credential.

中

modules/fact-check-x-authoritative-verify/scripts/authority_verify.py:110

Hardcoded URL

endpoint = os.getenv("FACTCHECK_TRUSTED_SEARCH_URL", "https://open.dknowc.cn/dependable/search").str

Although the default is HTTPS, the endpoint can be replaced without scheme or host validation before an API key is sent. This creates a credential-redirection risk.

中

modules/fact-check-x-authoritative-verify/scripts/authority_verify.py:110

Python getenv function

endpoint = os.getenv("FACTCHECK_TRUSTED_SEARCH_URL", "https://open.dknowc.cn/dependable/search").str

中

scripts/trusted_search_config.py:115

Python getenv function

endpoint = os.getenv("FACTCHECK_TRUSTED_SEARCH_URL", DEFAULT_ENDPOINT).strip()

The validation endpoint can be replaced without scheme or host restrictions before the API key is transmitted. A hostile configured endpoint could collect the credential.

低

modules/fact-check-x-authoritative-verify/scripts/authority_verify.py:114

Python HTTP libraries

request = urllib.request.Request(endpoint, data=json.dumps(payload, ensure_ascii=False).encode("utf-

This request transmits an atomic verification query and API key to the configured trusted-search service. The transfer is declared functionality, but it is a real third-party data exposure.

低

modules/fact-check-x-authoritative-verify/scripts/authority_verify.py:116

Python HTTP libraries

with urllib.request.urlopen(

The URL open call performs the declared outbound trusted-search request containing a query and credential header. This is intentional but remains a real network exposure.

低

scripts/trusted_search_config.py:122

Python HTTP libraries

request = urllib.request.Request(

The request includes the trusted-search API key and a validation query. This is expected configuration behavior, but it exposes both values to the selected endpoint.

低

scripts/trusted_search_config.py:129

Python HTTP libraries

with urllib.request.urlopen(

The URL open call sends the trusted-search credential to an external validation service. The action is intentional, but the network disclosure is real.

リスク要因

🌐 ネットワークアクセス (50)

🔑 環境変数 (50)

📁 ファイルシステムへのアクセス (50)

⚙️ 外部コマンド (50)

⚡ スクリプトを含む (13)

監査者: codex

このレポートを共有・引用

バージョン付き評価レポート、中立的なバッジ、埋め込みカード、引用を共有できます。Skillstore は証拠を報告しますが、この Skill が安全かどうかは判断しません。

バージョン別レポートを開く

レポートリンクをコピー

https://skillstore.io/skills/asi2030-fact-check-x-complete/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdownバッジ

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/asi2030-fact-check-x-complete/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/asi2030-fact-check-x-complete?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTMLバッジ

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/asi2030-fact-check-x-complete?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/asi2030-fact-check-x-complete/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

埋め込みカード

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/asi2030-fact-check-x-complete.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

学術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA形式の引用

asi2030. (2026). fact-check-x-complete security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version 1.1.5]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/asi2030-fact-check-x-complete/audits/1

BibTeX形式の引用

@techreport{asi2030-asi2030-fact-check-x-complete-2026,
  author = {asi2030},
  title = {fact-check-x-complete security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/asi2030-fact-check-x-complete/audits/1},
  note = {Author version 1.1.5}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "fact-check-x-complete security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "1.1.5"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "asi2030"
date-released: "2026-08-27"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/asi2030-fact-check-x-complete/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:asi2030-fact-check-x-complete:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore スコア

このスコアの理由証拠の信頼度: 中

アーキテクチャ

100

保守性

コンテンツ

コミュニティ

仕様準拠

作成できるもの

Compare Research Answers

Compare answers and citations from selected AI platforms before using them in a research brief.

Audit Decision Evidence

Trace disputed operational claims to captured sources and authoritative evidence before making a business decision.

Review AI Reliability

Evaluate answer coverage, citation faithfulness, and verified accuracy across supported AI services.

これらのプロンプトを試す

Check One Answer

Fact-check this question on DeepSeek: [question]. Capture the full answer and citations. Stop after the first report.

Compare Two Platforms

Compare DeepSeek and Doubao on this question: [question]. Show agreements, conflicts, citations, and evidence gaps.

Run Full Verification

Run the complete workflow for [question] across [platforms]. Continue through authoritative verification and deliver every staged report.

Audit a Complex Claim Set

Verify [question] across [platforms]. Split compound statements into atomic claims. Preserve conflicting evidence and exclude unresolved claims from final conclusions.

ベストプラクティス

Choose only platforms relevant to the question and confirm each capture before continuing.
Review captured answers and citations before requesting authoritative verification.
Inspect reports for confidential information before sharing the final package.

回避

Do not treat the unverified comparison draft as an authoritative answer.
Do not bypass failed captures with partial results or substituted search summaries.
Do not paste credentials into prompts, reports, commands, or shared artifacts.