スキル review-my-diff
📦

review-my-diff

v1.0 コンテンツリビジョン r2 安全 ⚙️ 外部コマンド

Review Your Diff Before Opening a Pull Request

Local changes can hide bugs, security gaps, and missing tests before human review. This skill guides an evidence-based review with prioritized findings and explicit verification results.

対応: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 78 ブロンズ

自分のエージェントでインストール

このリクエストをエージェントにコピーしてください。正規の Skill ページとマニフェストが含まれています。

エージェントリクエスト
Review the Skillstore skill "review-my-diff" from https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

エージェントは引き続き計画を提示し、セキュリティポリシーで必要な確認を求める必要があります。

エージェントが読めるリソース

AI エージェント、クローラー、スクリプトがページ全体ではなく整理されたコンテキストを必要とする場合は、これらのリンクを使ってください。

テストする

「review-my-diff」を使用しています。 Illustrative scenario: review a change that removes required input validation and adds no regression test.

期待される結果:

  • Intent: simplify request processing.
  • Checks run: none; this illustrative scenario provides no runnable repository.
  • Blocker summary: required validation is missing, allowing invalid requests into processing.
  • Suggested fix: restore validation and add a regression test.
  • Recommendation: needs rework because invalid input is not rejected.

「review-my-diff」を使用しています。 Illustrative scenario: review a small refactor where executed checks pass and inspection finds no actionable issue.

期待される結果:

  • Intent: reorganize existing logic without changing behavior.
  • Checks run: the review lists the exact commands and passing results from the actual session.
  • Blockers: nothing found.
  • Should fix: nothing found.
  • Looks good: existing behavior and regression coverage are preserved.
  • Recommendation: ready for human review; this is not approval.

セキュリティ監査

安全

All six static findings are false positives involving ordinary Git commands, Markdown formatting, or legitimate review instructions. No evidence found of credential theft, data exfiltration, malicious reconnaissance, or prompt injection. Running project checks executes repository code and requires a trusted environment.

1
スキャンされたファイル
56
解析済み行数
0
レビュー項目
0
誤検知を無視

リスク要因

最新の完了済み静的・セマンティック監査では、確認済みのセキュリティ検出事項は見つかりませんでした。これは、スキルに副作用がないことを証明するものではありません。
監査者: codex 監査履歴を表示 →
このレポートを共有・引用

バージョン付き評価レポート、中立的なバッジ、埋め込みカード、引用を共有できます。Skillstore は証拠を報告しますが、この Skill が安全かどうかは判断しません。

バージョン別レポートを開く
セキュリティ評価

レポートリンクをコピー

https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff/audits/2?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdownバッジ

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTMLバッジ

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

埋め込みカード

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
学術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA形式の引用

agentkitco. (2026). review-my-diff security audit report (audit version 2) [Author version 1.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff/audits/2

BibTeX形式の引用

@techreport{agentkitco-agentkitco-review-my-diff-2026, author = {agentkitco}, title = {review-my-diff security audit report (audit version 2)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {2}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff/audits/2}, note = {Author version 1.0} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "review-my-diff security audit report (audit version 2)" version: "1.0" type: report authors: - name: "agentkitco" date-released: "2026-10-22" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff/audits/2" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:agentkitco-review-my-diff:audit:2" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore スコア

このスコアの理由 証拠の信頼度: 中
55
アーキテクチャ
85
保守性
87
コンテンツ
65
コミュニティ
91
仕様準拠

作成できるもの

Check Local Changes Before a Pull Request

Review staged and unstaged changes for bugs, unsafe behavior, and missing tests before requesting feedback.

Inspect a Contributor Branch

Compare a contributor branch against its base and examine compatibility risks, surrounding callers, and test coverage.

Prioritize Review Work on Large Changes

Review a large diff by directory and separate blockers from smaller fixes, documenting coverage and unresolved questions.

これらのプロンプトを試す

Review My Current Changes
Review my staged and unstaged changes before I open a pull request. Report prioritized findings with file and line evidence. Do not edit files.
Review My Branch
Review this branch against the default branch using the merge base. State the intended change and check correctness, safety, and compatibility. Do not edit files.
Review Error Paths and Tests
Review my diff with attention to error handling, input validation, and missing regression tests. Run available quick checks and separate verified problems from suspicions.
Review a Large Compatibility Change
Review this large branch by directory, tracing affected callers, public interfaces, configuration, and migrations. Document coverage, skipped checks, blockers, and questions. End with a readiness recommendation.

ベストプラクティス

  • State the intended behavior and confirm the comparison base before reviewing branch changes.
  • Use a trusted environment for project checks, since tests and development tools execute repository code.
  • Require file and line evidence, exact check results, and explicit disclosure of unreviewed areas.

回避

  • Requesting automatic approval or treating the recommendation as a substitute for human review.
  • Assuming a review edits files or fixes reported issues without an explicit request.
  • Accepting unsupported findings or assuming that unreported tests passed.

よくある質問

Which changes can this skill review?
It reviews staged and unstaged changes, or compares a branch against its merge base with the default branch.
Does it modify my files?
The instructions prohibit editing files unless you ask. Project checks can still produce artifacts or other effects.
Does it run tests?
It runs existing tests, lint, and type checks when they are quick. It must report commands, results, and skipped checks.
How are findings organized?
Findings are grouped into blockers, recommended fixes, and optional nits. Each finding must identify a file, line, consequence, and suggested fix.
Can it handle a large diff?
It can review large diffs by directory and must disclose that approach. Coverage is not guaranteed to be exhaustive.
Does a ready recommendation approve my pull request?
No. The skill explicitly avoids approval and provides a readiness recommendation with reasons for human review.

開発者情報

作成者

agentkitco

ライセンス

MIT

作者バージョン

v1.0

Skillstore リビジョン

r2

バージョンに関する注意

作者が宣言したバージョンは有効な SemVer ではありません。

参照

18efac79a818d7e997295839638fdd21906cfd1c

メンテナンスの新しさ

2026/10/22

利用状況

5 ダウンロード · 0 閲覧

ファイル構成

📄 SKILL.md

agentkitco のその他のスキル

すべて表示
すべて表示