Historique des audits
diffdock - 4 audits
Version de l’audit 4
Dernier SûrJan 17, 2026, 06:46 AM
The static analysis flagged 295 potential issues, but ALL are FALSE POSITIVES. The scanner incorrectly identified scientific protein sequences (GFP containing 'SAM') as Windows SAM database references, scientific paper citations as weak cryptographic algorithms, standard Python loops as C2 beacon patterns, and markdown code block syntax as shell execution. This is a legitimate molecular docking research tool with no malicious intent or security vulnerabilities.
Facteurs de risque
⚙️ Commandes externes (4)
🌐 Accès réseau (2)
📁 Accès au système de fichiers (2)
⚡ Contient des scripts (1)
Version de l’audit 3
SûrJan 17, 2026, 06:46 AM
The static analysis flagged 295 potential issues, but ALL are FALSE POSITIVES. The scanner incorrectly identified scientific protein sequences (GFP containing 'SAM') as Windows SAM database references, scientific paper citations as weak cryptographic algorithms, standard Python loops as C2 beacon patterns, and markdown code block syntax as shell execution. This is a legitimate molecular docking research tool with no malicious intent or security vulnerabilities.
Facteurs de risque
⚙️ Commandes externes (4)
🌐 Accès réseau (2)
📁 Accès au système de fichiers (2)
⚡ Contient des scripts (1)
Version de l’audit 2
SûrJan 12, 2026, 04:19 PM
The static analysis flagged numerous false positives from documentation files containing bash command examples. No actual security vulnerabilities were found in the executable code. The skill is a legitimate scientific tool for molecular docking research.
Facteurs de risque
⚙️ Commandes externes (3)
🌐 Accès réseau (2)
📁 Accès au système de fichiers (2)
⚡ Contient des scripts (1)
Version de l’audit 1
Risque faibleJan 4, 2026, 05:11 PM
The skill includes local helper scripts that read and write user-specified files for validation and reporting. No network access, credential harvesting, or command execution was found. This is a legitimate scientific tool wrapper.