Compétences caveman-evidence-review
📦

caveman-evidence-review

Révision du contenu r1 Sûr ⚙️ Commandes externes

Review Caveman Cloud Evidence

LLM cost and quality changes are difficult to explain from aggregates alone. This skill produces bounded, trace-supported Caveman Cloud reviews without changing experiments.

Prend en charge: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 77 Bronze

Installer avec mon Agent

Copiez cette demande dans votre Agent. Elle contient la page Skill de référence et le manifeste.

Demande d’agent
Review the Skillstore skill "caveman-evidence-review" from https://skillstore.io/skills/juliusbrussee-caveman-evidence-review.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/juliusbrussee-caveman-evidence-review/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Votre Agent doit toujours présenter son plan et demander toute confirmation exigée par la politique de sécurité.

Ressources lisibles par les agents

Utilisez ces liens lorsqu’un Agent IA, un crawler ou un script a besoin d’un contexte propre au lieu de lire toute la page.

Détail Markdown GET /skills/juliusbrussee-caveman-evidence-review.md manifest signé GET /api/skills/juliusbrussee-caveman-evidence-review/manifest lockfile signé GET /api/skills/juliusbrussee-caveman-evidence-review/lockfile

Tester

Utilisation de « caveman-evidence-review ». Why did costs rise during the last seven days?

RĂ©sultat attendu:

  • Scope: selected project, August 17 through August 24.
  • Measured cost increased in the document-processing workflow, alongside more retries and a higher-cost model mix.
  • Representative trace identifiers and the comparison window are listed.
  • Model routing remains unproven until the same workflow is compared with an earlier control cohort.

Utilisation de « caveman-evidence-review ». Are the reported savings verified?

RĂ©sultat attendu:

Verified ledger savings are reported separately from inferred daily headroom. The review names the ledger window, supporting traces, and any missing verification signal.

Utilisation de « caveman-evidence-review ». Which workflow needs attention?

RĂ©sultat attendu:

The review ranks workflows using cost, failures, and latency, then cites representative traces and proposes one bounded read-only follow-up query.

Audit de sécurité

Sûr
v2 • 24/08/2026 Ouvrir le rapport versionné

All 26 external-command detections are false positives caused by Markdown backticks, fenced examples, or documented Caveman tool names. The system-reconnaissance detection is a read-only Caveman identity check, and no prompt injection or malicious intent was found.

1
Fichiers analysés
145
Lignes analysées
0
Éléments à examiner
0
Faux positifs ignorés

Facteurs de risque

⚙️ Commandes externes (26)
SKILL.md:21 SKILL.md:22 SKILL.md:38-40 SKILL.md:40-44 SKILL.md:44-47 SKILL.md:47-50 SKILL.md:50-54 SKILL.md:54-56 SKILL.md:56-57 SKILL.md:57-58 SKILL.md:58-59 SKILL.md:59-60 SKILL.md:60-62 SKILL.md:62-67 SKILL.md:67-71 SKILL.md:71-77 SKILL.md:77-84 SKILL.md:84-85 SKILL.md:85-86 SKILL.md:86-94 SKILL.md:94-102 SKILL.md:102-106 SKILL.md:106-112 SKILL.md:112-114 SKILL.md:114-120 SKILL.md:120-140
Le dernier audit statique et sémantique terminé n’a détecté aucun constat de sécurité confirmé. Cela ne prouve pas que le skill est sans effets secondaires.
Audité par: codex Voir l’historique des audits →
Partager et citer ce rapport

Partagez le rapport d’évaluation versionné, le badge neutre, la carte intégrable et les citations. Skillstore présente les preuves sans décider si ce Skill est sûr.

Ouvrir le rapport versionné
Évaluation de sécurité

Copier le lien du rapport

https://skillstore.io/skills/juliusbrussee-caveman-evidence-review/audits/2?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Badge Markdown

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/juliusbrussee-caveman-evidence-review/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/juliusbrussee-caveman-evidence-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

Badge HTML

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/juliusbrussee-caveman-evidence-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/juliusbrussee-caveman-evidence-review/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Carte intégrable

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/juliusbrussee-caveman-evidence-review.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
Citations académiques (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

Citation APA

juliusbrussee. (2026). caveman-evidence-review security audit report (audit version 2) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/juliusbrussee-caveman-evidence-review/audits/2

Citation BibTeX

@techreport{juliusbrussee-juliusbrussee-caveman-evidence-review-2026, author = {juliusbrussee}, title = {caveman-evidence-review security audit report (audit version 2)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {2}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/juliusbrussee-caveman-evidence-review/audits/2}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "caveman-evidence-review security audit report (audit version 2)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "juliusbrussee" date-released: "2026-08-24" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/juliusbrussee-caveman-evidence-review/audits/2" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:juliusbrussee-caveman-evidence-review:audit:2" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Score Skillstore

Pourquoi ce score Niveau de confiance des preuves: Moyen
55
Architecture
85
Maintenabilité
87
Contenu
65
Communauté
83
Conformité aux spécifications

Ce que vous pouvez créer

Investigate spend changes

Compare cost reports and trace cohorts to identify workflows, models, or retries associated with an LLM spend change.

Review reliability evidence

Examine errors, latency, status classes, and representative spans within a bounded production window.

Validate optimization results

Keep inferred headroom separate from verified ledger savings and identify the evidence supporting each result.

Essayez ces prompts

Review current costs 
Review current Caveman Cloud costs for the selected project. State the report window, cost basis, main drivers, and missing evidence.
Find workflow issues 
Review workflows for the last seven days. Identify high-cost or failing workflows, then cite representative trace identifiers and exact time windows.
Test a cost explanation 
Test whether model routing caused the recent cost increase. Compare a bounded suspect cohort with an earlier control cohort and report unresolved factors.
Audit optimization evidence 
Audit the selected project across costs, score, plan, workflows, and verified savings. Separate every cost category and inspect representative traces without payloads.

Bonnes pratiques

  • Select the correct Caveman project before requesting analysis.
  • Provide a bounded time window and a specific cost, quality, or reliability question.
  • Request payload review only when metadata and spans cannot answer the question.

Éviter

  • Do not treat an empty result as proof of zero cost or zero risk.
  • Do not combine measured costs, inferred headroom, verified savings, and evidence costs.
  • Do not claim causality from one aggregate or one expensive trace.

Foire aux questions

Does this skill change Caveman experiments?
No. It performs read-only reviews and only proposes possible actions.
What access does it require?
It requires Caveman authentication and a selected project context.
Does it read prompt or completion content?
Not by default. Payload retrieval requires an explicit user request.
Can it explain a cost increase?
It can test explanations using bounded cohorts and traces, but it labels unsupported causes as unproven.
How does it report savings?
It keeps verified ledger savings separate from inferred daily headroom and measured costs.
Which tools does it support?
It prefers Caveman MCP tools and uses documented Caveman CLI commands as a fallback.

Détails du développeur

Licence

MIT

RĂ©vision Skillstore

r1

Avis de version

L’auteur n’a déclaré aucune version.

DĂ©pĂ´t

https://github.com/juliusbrussee/caveman/tree/7bb71309e8749a4f112aacd3a54b3941d8689905/skills/caveman-evidence-review

RĂ©f

18c566f98cd9d675bf70dca057f35ef24e82ac57

RĂ©cence de maintenance

25/08/2026

Utilisation

1 téléchargements · 0 vues

Structure de fichiers

đź“„ SKILL.md