📦

better-layout

Name: better-layout
Author: jakubkrehel

Révision du contenu r1 Sûr ⚙️ Commandes externes

Improve Responsive Layouts and Reading Order

Interface layouts can lose clarity or clip content when resized, translated, or mirrored. This skill guides focused fixes for grouping, alignment, spacing, and responsive structure.

Prend en charge: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 78 Bronze

Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 78 Bronze

Installer avec mon Agent

Copiez cette demande dans votre Agent. Elle contient la page Skill de référence et le manifeste.

Demande d’agent

Review the Skillstore skill "better-layout" from https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-layout.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/jakubkrehel-better-layout/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Votre Agent doit toujours présenter son plan et demander toute confirmation exigée par la politique de sécurité.

Ressources lisibles par les agents

Utilisez ces liens lorsqu’un Agent IA, un crawler ou un script a besoin d’un contexte propre au lieu de lire toute la page.

Détail Markdown GET /skills/jakubkrehel-better-layout.md manifest signé GET /api/skills/jakubkrehel-better-layout/manifest lockfile signé GET /api/skills/jakubkrehel-better-layout/lockfile

Tester

Utilisation de « better-layout ». A settings form uses identical gaps within and between sections, plus separator lines after every field.

Résultat attendu:

Medium: section boundaries are unclear because all spacing is equal.
Use the existing spacing scale to make gaps between groups at least twice the gaps within each group.
Remove separators where spacing already communicates the grouping.
Rendered verification: not verified without browser access.

Utilisation de « better-layout ». A right-to-left interface keeps a floating action on the physical right, while a long translated button label clips.

Résultat attendu:

Medium: the floating action does not mirror with the interface.
Pair physical positioning with matching safe-area insets and add a right-to-left override.
High when the clipped label blocks an action: allow the button to grow and the action row to wrap.
Verify the RTL view, expanded labels, supported widths, and 200 percent zoom.

Audit de sécurité

Sûr

v1 • 09/10/2026 Ouvrir le rapport versionné

All 35 static findings are false positives involving Markdown formatting, CSS examples, or interface layout guidance. The approval terminology governs layout review outcomes, not security adjudication. No evidence found of shell execution, system reconnaissance, data exfiltration, or prompt injection in the reviewed files.

Fichiers analysés

363

Lignes analysées

Éléments à examiner

Faux positifs ignorés

Facteurs de risque

Le dernier audit statique et sémantique terminé n’a détecté aucun constat de sécurité confirmé. Cela ne prouve pas que le skill est sans effets secondaires.

Audité par: codex

Partager et citer ce rapport

Partagez le rapport d’évaluation versionné, le badge neutre, la carte intégrable et les citations. Skillstore présente les preuves sans décider si ce Skill est sûr.

Ouvrir le rapport versionné

Copier le lien du rapport

https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-layout/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Badge Markdown

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jakubkrehel-better-layout/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-layout?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

Badge HTML

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-layout?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jakubkrehel-better-layout/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Carte intégrable

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/jakubkrehel-better-layout.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

Citations académiques (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

Citation APA

jakubkrehel. (2026). better-layout security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-layout/audits/1

Citation BibTeX

@techreport{jakubkrehel-jakubkrehel-better-layout-2026,
  author = {jakubkrehel},
  title = {better-layout security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-layout/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "better-layout security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "jakubkrehel"
date-released: "2026-10-09"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-layout/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:jakubkrehel-better-layout:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Score Skillstore

Pourquoi ce score Niveau de confiance des preuves: Moyen

Architecture

Maintenabilité

Contenu

Communauté

Conformité aux spécifications

Ce que vous pouvez créer

Repair Responsive Components

Find overflow, clipped actions, and unsuitable breakpoints in components used across different container widths.

Improve Interface Hierarchy

Review grouping, shared edges, control distinction, and primary actions while preserving existing spacing tokens.

Prepare Layouts for Localization

Check long translated labels, wrapping, right-to-left mirroring, and safe-area positioning before a multilingual release.

Essayez ces prompts

Review a Single View

Review this view for grouping, alignment, and reading order. Identify visible failures and suggest small changes using existing spacing tokens.

Fix Responsive Overflow

Review this component at supported widths and 320 pixels. Find overflow or clipped actions, propose focused fixes, and mark unavailable checks as not verified.

Check Translation and Mirroring

Review this layout with expanded labels, German text, and right-to-left direction. Preserve DOM order and identify clipping, broken mirroring, or missing disclosure cues.

Audit a Complete Layout

Audit these views using project tokens. Check supported widths, 320 pixels, 200 percent zoom, RTL, sticky headers, and safe areas. Group findings by principle.

Bonnes pratiques

Provide the relevant components, supported widths, and existing spacing or density tokens before requesting a review.
Require a demonstrable failure and user impact for each finding, rather than treating different spacing values as defects.
Verify changes with narrow widths, zoom, expanded translations, and RTL; explicitly record checks that could not run.

Éviter

Replace established spacing tokens with default measurements without evidence of a layout failure.
Change visual order independently of DOM order to hide reading-order problems.
Approve uninspected views or claim browser verification when only source files were reviewed.

Foire aux questions

What does this skill review?

It reviews grouping, alignment, reading order, spacing, responsive structure, translated-text growth, and right-to-left layout behavior.

Which AI tools are supported?

The marketplace lists Claude, Codex, and Claude Code. Browser verification depends on the tools available in your environment.

Does it run an automated layout scanner?

No. The package contains written guidance and CSS or HTML examples, not an executable scanner.

Will it replace my design system?

No. Fixes should use your project styling system and spacing tokens. Default measurements apply only when no established scale exists.

Can it verify layouts without a browser?

It can inspect source structure, sizing rules, and logical properties. Rendered checks that cannot run must be reported as not verified.

Does it provide a complete accessibility audit?

No. It addresses layout-related visibility and reading order. Focus behavior, target sizes, and other accessibility concerns require a separate review.