pricing-reference-frames
Build Credible Pricing Anchors
Pricing copy can emphasize competitor discounts instead of the buyer's actual costs. This skill selects a credible reference frame and drafts quantified copy with bounded guarantees.
Installer avec mon Agent
Copiez cette demande dans votre Agent. Elle contient la page Skill de référence et le manifeste.
Review the Skillstore skill "pricing-reference-frames" from https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-reference-frames.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-reference-frames/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Votre Agent doit toujours présenter son plan et demander toute confirmation exigée par la politique de sécurité.
Ressources lisibles par les agents
Utilisez ces liens lorsquâun Agent IA, un crawler ou un script a besoin dâun contexte propre au lieu de lire toute la page.
Tester
Utilisation de « pricing-reference-frames ». Founders spend six hours weekly on manual reporting. Our service costs $199 monthly and automates collection. Approved guarantee: first-month refund if setup exceeds 30 days.
RĂ©sultat attendu:
- Chosen frame: Status quo. The verified anchor is six hours of manual work each week.
- Headline: Stop spending six hours a week collecting reports.
- Subhead: Replace manual collection with automated reporting for $199 monthly.
- Mechanism: Automate collection. Reduce repetitive work. Deliver consolidated reports.
- Guarantee: If setup exceeds 30 days, we refund your first month.
- Rejected frames: No opportunity, replacement, or competitor cost evidence was supplied.
Utilisation de « pricing-reference-frames ». A procurement team estimates $120,000 to build internally and $20,000 yearly maintenance. Subscription costs $12,000 yearly. No guarantee is approved.
RĂ©sultat attendu:
- Chosen frame: Replacement cost, based on the supplied internal build and maintenance estimates.
- Headline: Avoid a $120,000 internal build.
- Subhead: Compare your build estimate and $20,000 annual maintenance against a $12,000 yearly subscription.
- Evidence gap: Confirm comparable scope before publishing the cost comparison.
- Guarantee: Pending approved outcome, deadline, and liability terms.
- Rejected frames: Current workflow and delay costs were not quantified.
Audit de sécurité
SûrAll 17 static findings are false positives: Markdown backticks, fixed documentation references, and a filename mistaken for reconnaissance. No evidence found of command execution, malicious traversal, exfiltration, or prompt injection in SKILL.md. Shared reference contents were not supplied and were not assessed.
Facteurs de risque
âïž Commandes externes (13)
đ AccĂšs au systĂšme de fichiers (3)
Partager et citer ce rapport
Partagez le rapport dâĂ©valuation versionnĂ©, le badge neutre, la carte intĂ©grable et les citations. Skillstore prĂ©sente les preuves sans dĂ©cider si ce Skill est sĂ»r.
Copier le lien du rapport
https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-reference-frames/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportBadge Markdown
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-reference-frames?utm_source=security_passport_badge)Badge HTML
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-reference-frames?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-reference-frames/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Carte intégrable
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-reference-frames.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Citations académiques (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
Citation APA
cmj-hub. (2026). pricing-reference-frames security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-reference-frames/audits/1Citation BibTeX
@techreport{cmj-hub-cmj-hub-pricing-reference-frames-2026,
author = {cmj-hub},
title = {pricing-reference-frames security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-reference-frames/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "pricing-reference-frames security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "cmj-hub"
date-released: "2026-10-03"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-reference-frames/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:cmj-hub-pricing-reference-frames:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Score Skillstore
Pourquoi ce score Niveau de confiance des preuves: MoyenCe que vous pouvez créer
Position a SaaS pricing page
Compare current tools and manual work against the product, then draft an anchor above the pricing tiers.
Rewrite segment-specific copy
Select an evidence-backed frame for one customer segment and replace discount-led messaging with quantified outcome language.
Explain internal replacement costs
Use supplied staffing and maintenance estimates to explain the alternative to purchasing, with a bounded guarantee draft.
Essayez ces prompts
Help me choose a pricing reference frame for [product] and [customer segment]. Ask about current tools, time spent, and costs before drafting.
For [segment], current work takes [hours/week] at [hourly cost], plus [monthly tool costs]. Our price is [price]. Draft the anchor block. Use only supplied facts. Ask for approved guarantee terms.
Rewrite this pricing copy: [copy]. Use these verified customer costs and outcomes: [evidence]. Compare all four frames, explain rejected choices, and show loss-aversion changes.
Using supplied customer segments, current tiers, and cost evidence, recommend a frame for each segment. Draft separate blocks within the skill's word limits. Explain rejected frames and flag evidence gaps. Use only these approved guarantee terms: [terms].
Bonnes pratiques
- Start with one customer segment and verify its current workflow, labor rates, tool costs, and measurement period.
- Choose the strongest plausible frame, and keep every numerical claim tied to supplied evidence.
- Approve guarantee outcomes, deadlines, and liability limits before publishing the generated copy.
Ăviter
- Inventing customer costs or urgency to make an anchor appear stronger.
- Leading with competitor discounts when a credible status quo or replacement frame exists.
- Publishing an open-ended guarantee or an outcome commitment the business cannot deliver.