linkedin-craft
Craft Clear LinkedIn Posts and Stronger Hooks
LinkedIn drafts often lack clear openings, concrete evidence, and readable structure. This skill provides hook variants, concise post formatting, and focused founder-voice critique.
Installer avec mon Agent
Copiez cette demande dans votre Agent. Elle contient la page Skill de référence et le manifeste.
Review the Skillstore skill "linkedin-craft" from https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-linkedin-craft.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/cmj-hub-linkedin-craft/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Votre Agent doit toujours présenter son plan et demander toute confirmation exigée par la politique de sécurité.
Ressources lisibles par les agents
Utilisez ces liens lorsquâun Agent IA, un crawler ou un script a besoin dâun contexte propre au lieu de lire toute la page.
Tester
Utilisation de « linkedin-craft ». Suggest stronger hooks about onboarding. Supplied fact: simplifying a checklist reduced setup time from six days to four.
RĂ©sultat attendu:
- Contrarian: Our onboarding improvement came from a simpler checklist, not another training session.
- Specific evidence: Setup time fell from six days to four after we simplified the onboarding checklist.
- Question reframe: Instead of asking what to add to onboarding, ask which steps people actually need.
- Recommended: Use the specific evidence hook because the measured result makes the improvement concrete.
Utilisation de « linkedin-craft ». Format this result as a LinkedIn post: a consultant replaced three status meetings with a shared update and saved two hours weekly.
RĂ©sultat attendu:
Replacing three status meetings saved our team two hours each week.
We moved routine updates into one shared document.
The change was simple:
- Three status meetings removed.
- One shared update introduced.
- Two hours saved each week.
Keep the conversation for decisions that need it.
#Teamwork #Productivity
Utilisation de « linkedin-craft ». Critique this opening: Leadership is everything. Agree? No supporting evidence or voice rubric is supplied.
RĂ©sultat attendu:
Weakest line: Leadership is everything.
Rewrite: Name the leadership decision and its observed result before writing the opening.
Rationale: The original claim is broad and unsupported.
Anti-pattern: The closing question requests agreement instead of adding substance.
Verdict: Start over with a concrete example.
Audit de sécurité
SûrAll eight static findings are false positives: seven identify Markdown backticks, and one identifies a fixed companion-skill reference. No evidence found of shell execution, unauthorized filesystem access, data exfiltration, or prompt injection in the supplied file.
Facteurs de risque
âïž Commandes externes (7)
đ AccĂšs au systĂšme de fichiers (1)
Partager et citer ce rapport
Partagez le rapport dâĂ©valuation versionnĂ©, le badge neutre, la carte intĂ©grable et les citations. Skillstore prĂ©sente les preuves sans dĂ©cider si ce Skill est sĂ»r.
Copier le lien du rapport
https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-linkedin-craft/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportBadge Markdown
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-linkedin-craft?utm_source=security_passport_badge)Badge HTML
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-linkedin-craft?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/cmj-hub-linkedin-craft/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Carte intégrable
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/cmj-hub-linkedin-craft.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Citations académiques (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
Citation APA
cmj-hub. (2026). linkedin-craft security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-linkedin-craft/audits/1Citation BibTeX
@techreport{cmj-hub-cmj-hub-linkedin-craft-2026,
author = {cmj-hub},
title = {linkedin-craft security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-linkedin-craft/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "linkedin-craft security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "cmj-hub"
date-released: "2026-10-03"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-linkedin-craft/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:cmj-hub-linkedin-craft:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Score Skillstore
Pourquoi ce score Niveau de confiance des preuves: MoyenCe que vous pouvez créer
Share a Founder Lesson
Turn a supplied business lesson into hook options and a concise LinkedIn post supported by concrete evidence.
Improve Client Drafts
Identify weak openings, vague evidence, and engagement bait before rewriting the weakest line.
Present Professional Results
Format a finished project reflection into short body lines, evidence bullets, and a direct closing sentence.
Essayez ces prompts
Give me three stronger LinkedIn hooks for [topic]. Use different archetypes and recommend the strongest.
Generate five hook variants for [topic], one per archetype. Use only these facts: [facts]. Recommend a primary hook with a rationale.
Reformat this LinkedIn draft for quick reading: [draft]. Preserve the facts and voice. Use evidence bullets, at most 200 words, and three hashtags.
Critique this draft against the available founder voice rubric: [draft]. Report dimension scores, anti-patterns, the weakest-line rewrite, and an editorial verdict. Explain each score.
Bonnes pratiques
- Provide verified facts, measurements, and examples before requesting evidence-based hooks.
- Supply the companion voice rubric when requesting a detailed founder-voice critique.
- Review factual accuracy, tone, word count, and hashtags before manually publishing.
Ăviter
- Inventing metrics or personal experiences to make a hook more persuasive.
- Adding engagement bait, emoji blocks, or more than three hashtags.
- Treating subjective critique scores as objective predictions of audience engagement.