evp-craft
Craft EVP Messaging for Your Audience Awareness Tier
Generic value propositions can miss the pain and awareness level of a specific audience. This skill drafts three concise alternatives and checks their specificity and fit.
Installer avec mon Agent
Copiez cette demande dans votre Agent. Elle contient la page Skill de référence et le manifeste.
Review the Skillstore skill "evp-craft" from https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-evp-craft.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/cmj-hub-evp-craft/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Votre Agent doit toujours présenter son plan et demander toute confirmation exigée par la politique de sécurité.
Ressources lisibles par les agents
Utilisez ces liens lorsquâun Agent IA, un crawler ou un script a besoin dâun contexte propre au lieu de lire toute la page.
Tester
Utilisation de « evp-craft ». Draft a Tier 3 EVP for agency owners facing unpredictable pipelines. Outcome: 14 qualified meetings monthly. Tradeoff: hiring more sales representatives.
Résultat attendu:
- Outcome-led: For agency owners facing unpredictable pipelines, we deliver 14 qualified meetings monthly without hiring more sales representatives.
- Tradeoff-led: For agency owners facing unpredictable pipelines, we deliver 14 qualified meetings monthly without adding sales headcount.
- ICP-led: Agency owners with unpredictable pipelines use us for 14 qualified meetings monthly without hiring more sales representatives.
- Recommended primary: Outcome-led, because the supplied meeting target makes the result concrete.
- Proof needed: Evidence supporting the supplied monthly meeting target.
Utilisation de « evp-craft ». Critique this EVP for agency owners at Tier 3: We help businesses grow faster with innovative solutions.
Résultat attendu:
- Word count: 8.
- Tier-fit: Unclear; the line does not name a solution or define the audience.
- Issues: The audience is broad, the outcome is unmeasured, and the tradeoff is missing.
- Rewrite requires: A concrete outcome, the prospect pain wording, and an avoided tradeoff.
- Next question: What measurable result can you substantiate for agency owners?
Audit de sécurité
SûrAll 14 static findings are false positives: Markdown backticks mark identifiers and output templates, not shell execution. The fixed relative paths reference framework documentation, not sensitive files. No evidence found of prompt injection, credential access, exfiltration, or destructive instructions in SKILL.md.
Facteurs de risque
âïž Commandes externes (12)
đ AccĂšs au systĂšme de fichiers (2)
Partager et citer ce rapport
Partagez le rapport dâĂ©valuation versionnĂ©, le badge neutre, la carte intĂ©grable et les citations. Skillstore prĂ©sente les preuves sans dĂ©cider si ce Skill est sĂ»r.
Copier le lien du rapport
https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-evp-craft/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportBadge Markdown
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-evp-craft?utm_source=security_passport_badge)Badge HTML
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-evp-craft?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/cmj-hub-evp-craft/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Carte intégrable
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/cmj-hub-evp-craft.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Citations académiques (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
Citation APA
cmj-hub. (2026). evp-craft security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-evp-craft/audits/1Citation BibTeX
@techreport{cmj-hub-cmj-hub-evp-craft-2026,
author = {cmj-hub},
title = {evp-craft security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-evp-craft/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "evp-craft security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "cmj-hub"
date-released: "2026-10-03"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-evp-craft/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:cmj-hub-evp-craft:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Score Skillstore
Pourquoi ce score Niveau de confiance des preuves: MoyenCe que vous pouvez créer
Develop segment-specific positioning
Compare three EVP angles for a defined customer segment and one awareness tier before selecting a primary message.
Prepare prospect conversation openers
Draft concise sales openers using prospect pain, a concrete outcome, and a specific tradeoff.
Review page messaging
Critique an existing headline or tagline for word count, audience fit, and specificity, then rewrite it in the same voice.
Essayez ces prompts
Help me choose a Schwartz awareness tier for [audience]. They describe their problem as [pain] and currently know [solutions or products]. Ask for missing details.
Draft three EVP variants for tier [1-5]. ICP: [segment]. Pain: [prospect wording]. Outcome: [specific result]. Tradeoff: [avoided cost]. Proof: [optional evidence]. Keep each within 22 words.
Critique this EVP: [text]. Intended audience: [segment]. Intended tier: [1-5]. Report word count, actual tier fit, and specific issues. Rewrite it in the same voice.
For tier [1-5], generate three variants using [ICP], [pain], [outcome], [tradeoff], and [proof]. Check every criterion, recommend a primary, and explain suitable placements. Identify unsupported claims without inventing evidence.
Bonnes pratiques
- Use prospect language for pain and name a customer segment that excludes poor-fit audiences.
- Provide a concrete outcome and supporting evidence before selecting copy for publication.
- Review every variant against the 22-word limit, specific tradeoffs, and the selected awareness tier.
Ăviter
- Drafting an EVP without a clear prospect pain statement.
- Replacing concrete outcomes with vague claims such as improve or grow.
- Using product-aware messaging for an audience that only recognizes its problem.
Foire aux questions
What does this skill produce?
What information should I provide?
Must each variant contain exactly 22 words?
Can it improve an existing EVP?
Can I invoke evp-craft directly?
Does it verify outcomes or proof?
Détails du développeur
Auteur
cmj-hubLicence
MIT
Révision Skillstore
r1
Avis de version
Lâauteur nâa dĂ©clarĂ© aucune version.
DépÎt
https://github.com/cmj-hub/claude-evp/tree/dd75ba1353e0b76684398435f403006b06a9ef13/skills/evp-craftRéf
ff55fd87d71bb4d107911515793162918d5c6520
Récence de maintenance
03/10/2026
Utilisation
0 téléchargements · 0 vues
Structure de fichiers
đ SKILL.md