cold-email-spam-lint
Review Cold Email Drafts for Spam Signals
Cold email drafts can contain misleading subjects, promotional wording, and excessive links. This skill defines six review checks and a structured report, with deterministic execution dependent on an external scanner.
ArrĂȘtez-vous et demandez confirmation avant lâinstallation.
Examinez le plan et obtenez le consentement explicite de lâutilisateur avant de modifier des fichiers.
Installer avec mon Agent
Copiez cette demande dans votre Agent. Elle contient la page Skill de référence et le manifeste.
Review the Skillstore skill "cold-email-spam-lint" from https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-spam-lint.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-spam-lint/manifest. Verify the artifact. Stop and obtain explicit user consent before installing or changing files.Votre Agent doit toujours présenter son plan et demander toute confirmation exigée par la politique de sécurité.
Ressources lisibles par les agents
Utilisez ces liens lorsquâun Agent IA, un crawler ou un script a besoin dâun contexte propre au lieu de lire toute la page.
Tester
Utilisation de « cold-email-spam-lint ». Subject: Re: URGENT pipeline update. Body: You will not believe this offer. No prior conversation exists.
RĂ©sultat attendu:
Subject flags: false reply prefix and spam-trigger wording. Body flag: clickbait wording. Deterministic score unavailable because the scanner is not included.
Utilisation de « cold-email-spam-lint ». Subject: ACT NOW. Body: Review our offer at https://example.com/a and https://example.com/b.
RĂ©sultat attendu:
- Subject: uppercase wording and the listed ACT NOW spam trigger.
- Body: two links exceed the documented one-link threshold.
- Send verdict withheld until score direction is clarified.
Audit de sécurité
Risque élevéAll 15 static findings are false positives involving Markdown formatting, fixed repository references, or a source citation. Semantic review found unsafe shell interpolation of email text and conflicting score thresholds that could approve risky drafts. The referenced scanner and lexicon are absent, so implementation safety and claimed performance cannot be verified.
Préoccupations de sécurité confirmées (2)
Facteurs de risque
âïž Commandes externes (11)
đ AccĂšs au systĂšme de fichiers (3)
Partager et citer ce rapport
Partagez le rapport dâĂ©valuation versionnĂ©, le badge neutre, la carte intĂ©grable et les citations. Skillstore prĂ©sente les preuves sans dĂ©cider si ce Skill est sĂ»r.
Copier le lien du rapport
https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-spam-lint/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportBadge Markdown
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-spam-lint?utm_source=security_passport_badge)Badge HTML
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-spam-lint?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-spam-lint/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Carte intégrable
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-spam-lint.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Citations académiques (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
Citation APA
cmj-hub. (2026). cold-email-spam-lint security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-spam-lint/audits/1Citation BibTeX
@techreport{cmj-hub-cmj-hub-cold-email-spam-lint-2026,
author = {cmj-hub},
title = {cold-email-spam-lint security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-spam-lint/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "cold-email-spam-lint security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "cmj-hub"
date-released: "2026-10-03"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-spam-lint/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:cmj-hub-cold-email-spam-lint:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Score Skillstore
Pourquoi ce score Niveau de confiance des preuves: MoyenCe que vous pouvez créer
Review Sales Outreach
Identify promotional wording, excessive capitalization, and misleading reply prefixes before reviewing a sales draft for sending.
Check Campaign Drafts
Apply the same six documented checks across campaign drafts and collect line-level issues for editorial review.
Check Partnership Emails
Review partnership requests for clickbait, subject emoji, and unnecessary links before contacting potential partners.
Essayez ces prompts
Review this subject and body against the six documented spam checks: [subject] [body]. List flags without claiming scanner execution.
Review [subject] and [body]. There is no prior thread. Flag misleading reply prefixes, capitalization, subject emoji, and spam wording.
Compare these drafts: [original] [revision]. Report changes across all six checks. Do not invent scores or guarantee inbox placement.
Review [draft batch] with line-level flags. Execute only a verified scanner through shell-free arguments. Resolve score direction before assigning send verdicts.
Bonnes pratiques
- Verify the scanner and reference files before execution, then pass email text without shell interpolation.
- Clarify score direction and test clean and heavily flagged drafts before using send verdicts.
- Review flags alongside sender authentication, reputation, and recipient consent.
Ăviter
- Paste untrusted subject or body text directly into the documented Bash command.
- Treat a high score as approval without resolving the risk-label conflict.
- Present heuristic review as verified scanner output or guaranteed inbox placement.