監査履歴

All eight static findings are false positives caused by Markdown fences or inline code formatting in SKILL.md. The skill contains no shell commands, prompt injection, network instructions, or semantic evidence of malicious intent.

All eight static external-command findings are false positives caused by Markdown code fences and inline code formatting in SKILL.md. A separate semantic risk remains because the skill recommends inspect-based runtime introspection, which can execute import-time Python code. No prompt injection, network access, or credential handling was found.

The eight static backtick findings are false positives from Markdown code fences and inline identifiers, not shell or Ruby execution. One contextual issue remains: the skill recommends runtime introspection with inspect, which can require importing target Python modules and executing top-level code. The author should prefer AST parsing and require sandboxing or explicit confirmation for runtime inspection.

Static analysis reported Ruby or shell backtick execution and weak cryptography patterns, but review found only Markdown fences, inline Markdown examples, and documentation text. No executable scripts, network calls, credential access, prompt injection attempts, or malicious intent were found in SKILL.md.

This skill is a documentation guide with no executable code. All 27 static findings are false positives from markdown code examples and documentation formatting. The skill describes using Python standard library tools for documentation generation with no network access or command execution.

AI analysis failed after multiple attempts - MANUAL REVIEW REQUIRED before publishing. This skill cannot be auto-published until reviewed by a human.

AI analysis failed after multiple attempts - MANUAL REVIEW REQUIRED before publishing. This skill cannot be auto-published until reviewed by a human.

The static analysis flagged false positives. The external_commands findings were code examples in markdown backticks, not actual command execution. The weak cryptographic algorithm findings were also false positives - these were markdown code blocks showing example documentation format, not actual crypto usage. This skill only processes Python files to generate documentation.

The static analysis flagged false positives. The external_commands findings were code examples in markdown backticks, not actual command execution. The weak cryptographic algorithm findings were also false positives - these were markdown code blocks showing example documentation format, not actual crypto usage. This skill only processes Python files to generate documentation.