📦

w-retro

Name: w-retro
Author: blockmatic

Révision du contenu r1 Sûr

Review Completed Work and Improve Next Time

Teams often finish tasks without recording what changed, what evidence was missing, or what should improve. This skill produces a concise, task-specific retrospective with up to three practical next steps.

Prend en charge: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 78 Bronze

Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 78 Bronze

Installer avec mon Agent

Copiez cette demande dans votre Agent. Elle contient la page Skill de référence et le manifeste.

Demande d’agent

Review the Skillstore skill "w-retro" from https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Votre Agent doit toujours présenter son plan et demander toute confirmation exigée par la politique de sécurité.

Ressources lisibles par les agents

Utilisez ces liens lorsqu’un Agent IA, un crawler ou un script a besoin d’un contexte propre au lieu de lire toute la page.

Détail Markdown GET /skills/blockmatic-w-retro.md manifest signé GET /api/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/manifest lockfile signé GET /api/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/lockfile

Tester

Utilisation de « w-retro ». We needed to add export filtering. The filter shipped and unit tests passed, but no browser test was run.

Résultat attendu:

Requested versus shipped: Export filtering was added and unit-tested. Evidence gap: Browser behavior was not checked. Next change: Add one browser test for filter selection and downloaded results.

Utilisation de « w-retro ». The task was to update the onboarding guide. The guide changed, but the examples were not checked against the current interface.

Résultat attendu:

Requested versus shipped: The onboarding guide was updated, but example accuracy was not verified.
Process gap: The task lacked a user-interface consistency check.
Next changes: Review examples against the current interface and add a lightweight documentation checklist.

Audit de sécurité

Sûr

v1 • 20/09/2026 Ouvrir le rapport versionné

The scanned skill is a 12-line, chat-only retrospective checklist with no executable code or detected security patterns. No prompt-injection, data-exfiltration, or business-logic abuse evidence was found in SKILL.md.

Fichiers analysés

Lignes analysées

Éléments à examiner

Faux positifs ignorés

Le dernier audit statique et sémantique terminé n’a détecté aucun constat de sécurité confirmé. Cela ne prouve pas que le skill est sans effets secondaires.

Audité par: codex

Partager et citer ce rapport

Partagez le rapport d’évaluation versionné, le badge neutre, la carte intégrable et les citations. Skillstore présente les preuves sans décider si ce Skill est sûr.

Ouvrir le rapport versionné

Copier le lien du rapport

https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Badge Markdown

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

Badge HTML

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Carte intégrable

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/blockmatic-w-retro.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

Citations académiques (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

Citation APA

blockmatic. (2026). w-retro security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/audits/1

Citation BibTeX

@techreport{blockmatic-blockmatic-w-retro-2026,
  author = {blockmatic},
  title = {w-retro security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "w-retro security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "blockmatic"
date-released: "2026-09-20"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:blockmatic-w-retro:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Score Skillstore

Pourquoi ce score Niveau de confiance des preuves: Moyen

Architecture

Maintenabilité

Contenu

Communauté

Conformité aux spécifications

Ce que vous pouvez créer

Close a development task

Review the request, shipped changes, checks, and documentation before closing a coding task.

Improve team delivery

Capture specific process gaps after a sprint item, project milestone, or cross-functional deliverable.

Evaluate an AI-assisted workflow

Compare the requested work with the AI-produced result and record better checks for the next session.

Essayez ces prompts

Basic task retrospective

Review the completed task in this conversation. State what was requested, what shipped, and one improvement for next time.

Check process gaps

Run a retrospective on this completed task. Identify skipped checks, unclear requirements, extra scope, and missing documentation. Suggest no more than three specific changes.

Compare plan and outcome

Compare the original request, plan, implementation, and validation evidence. Explain the most important differences and recommend up to three changes for the next similar task.

Audit an AI-assisted delivery

Perform a task-specific retrospective of this AI-assisted delivery. Separate outcome gaps from process gaps, cite the available evidence, and prioritize three changes that would improve the next session.

Bonnes pratiques

Run the skill after checks are complete and the delivered result is known.
Provide the original request, completed work, validation evidence, and relevant constraints.
Prefer specific recommendations tied to this task over broad process advice.

Éviter

Do not use the retrospective as a substitute for implementing a required fix.
Do not request generic lessons without sharing task-specific evidence.
Do not turn a short retrospective into an unfocused list of every possible improvement.

Foire aux questions

When should I use this skill?

Use it after completing a task and recording the checks or evidence that support the result.

What does the skill review?

It compares the request with the shipped result and checks for process or evidence gaps.

How many improvements does it suggest?

It suggests at most three concrete changes for the next similar task.

Can it change files or create commits?

No. It responds in chat and does not implement changes, commit files, or open pull requests.

What context produces the best result?

Include the request, plan, completed work, validation checks, constraints, and known uncertainties.

Does it replace a formal incident review?

No. It supports routine task learning and does not replace incident, compliance, or security review processes.

Détails du développeur

Auteur

blockmatic

Licence

MIT

Révision Skillstore

Avis de version

L’auteur n’a déclaré aucune version.

Dépôt

https://github.com/blockmatic/basilic-skills/tree/5fa16493413923e31f1df31f7260224f0f291d9e/skills/w-retro

Réf

7cd60e5c44d39477abb7a2c00ae0de2cf2a01392

Récence de maintenance

20/09/2026

Utilisation

0 téléchargements · 0 vues

Structure de fichiers

📄 SKILL.md