Compétences brag-doc-from-git
📦

brag-doc-from-git

v1.0 Révision du contenu r1 Risque moyen ⚙️ Commandes externes

Build an Evidence-Based Brag Document from Git

Review preparation is difficult when contributions are scattered across pull requests, commits, and personal notes. This skill groups that evidence into a Markdown draft and marks missing results instead of inventing impact.

Prend en charge: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Maintain this Skill? Claim it 📊 70 Adéquat

Installer avec mon Agent

Copiez cette demande dans votre Agent. Elle contient la page Skill de référence et le manifeste.

Demande d’agent
Review the Skillstore skill "brag-doc-from-git" from https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Votre Agent doit toujours présenter son plan et demander toute confirmation exigée par la politique de sécurité.

Ressources lisibles par les agents

Utilisez ces liens lorsqu’un Agent IA, un crawler ou un script a besoin d’un contexte propre au lieu de lire toute la page.

Tester

Utilisation de « brag-doc-from-git ». Sample evidence: PR #42 added retry handling on March 12. No outcome metrics were provided.

Résultat attendu:

  • Theme: Reliability
  • What I did: Added retry handling.
  • Result: [GAP: What changed for users or the team?]
  • Evidence: March 12, supplied PR #42 reference.
  • Priority question: Do incident records show a change in failed requests after deployment?

Utilisation de « brag-doc-from-git ». Sample notes: I owned the cache integration in a team project. User-provided measurements show response time fell from 240 ms to 180 ms.

Résultat attendu:

  • Theme: Performance
  • What I did: Contributed the cache integration to a team performance project.
  • Result: User-provided measurements show response time decreased from 240 ms to 180 ms.
  • Scope signal: Owned the cache integration, not the entire project.
  • Evidence gap: Add the project link and measurement source.

Audit de sécurité

Risque moyen
v2 • 22/10/2026 Ouvrir le rapport versionné

All six static findings are false positives from Markdown delimiters, inline examples, or legitimate review-writing instructions. The authenticated GitHub search lacks repository filters and can retrieve private repository metadata outside the user-approved scope. No evidence found of malicious intent, credential theft, destructive commands, or audit-directed prompt injection.

1
Fichiers analysés
50
Lignes analysées
0
Éléments à examiner
0
Faux positifs ignorés

Préoccupations de sécurité confirmées (1)

Moyen
Authenticated Search Exceeds Approved Repository Scope
The GitHub CLI search filters by author and merge date but not repository. It can retrieve private PR metadata from unnamed repositories, contradicting the explicit access restriction.
Line 19 has no repository filter despite the access restriction on line 24. Actual exposure depends on authenticated account permissions and matching PRs.

Facteurs de risque

Partager et citer ce rapport

Partagez le rapport d’évaluation versionné, le badge neutre, la carte intégrable et les citations. Skillstore présente les preuves sans décider si ce Skill est sûr.

Ouvrir le rapport versionné
Évaluation de sécurité

Copier le lien du rapport

https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/audits/2?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Badge Markdown

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

Badge HTML

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Carte intégrable

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
Citations académiques (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

Citation APA

agentkitco. (2026). brag-doc-from-git security audit report (audit version 2) [Author version 1.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/audits/2

Citation BibTeX

@techreport{agentkitco-agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git-2026, author = {agentkitco}, title = {brag-doc-from-git security audit report (audit version 2)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {2}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/audits/2}, note = {Author version 1.0} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "brag-doc-from-git security audit report (audit version 2)" version: "1.0" type: report authors: - name: "agentkitco" date-released: "2026-10-22" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/audits/2" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git:audit:2" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Score Skillstore

Pourquoi ce score Niveau de confiance des preuves: Moyen
55
Architecture
85
Maintenabilité
87
Contenu
65
Communauté
91
Conformité aux spécifications

Ce que vous pouvez créer

Prepare a Performance Self-Review

Group recent engineering contributions into evidence-backed themes and identify missing outcomes before submitting a review.

Assemble Promotion Evidence

Organize supported leadership, cross-team work, and technical contributions while preserving accurate ownership and evidence links.

Refresh Resume Accomplishments

Convert verified contributions into resume material and remove confidential details intended only for internal documents.

Essayez ces prompts

Start a Brag Document
Create a brag document for my last six months of work. Ask me which repositories to use before collecting evidence.
Review Local Contributions
Use local Git history in [repository] for [author email] since [date]. Group contributions by theme and mark unknown results as gaps.
Combine Code and Team Contributions
Draft my self-review for [date range] using only [approved repositories]. Restrict GitHub queries to those repositories. Include [mentoring and incident notes].
Prepare a Promotion Outline
Build a promotion outline from [approved evidence and notes]. Preserve team attribution, distinguish verified outcomes from gaps, and rank missing evidence. Ask three priority questions.

Bonnes pratiques

  • Agree on the time window and repository list, then add explicit repository filters before running GitHub searches.
  • Provide outcome measurements, evidence links, and notes about contributions that Git does not record.
  • Review attribution and remove confidential information before sharing the draft outside your organization.

Éviter

  • Treating commit counts or pull request titles as proof of business impact.
  • Claiming sole ownership of team results without evidence of your specific contribution.
  • Running an unrestricted account-wide search when only named repositories are approved.

Foire aux questions

Which AI tools can use this skill?
The skill lists Claude, Codex, and Claude Code as supported tools.
Does it require GitHub?
No. It includes a local Git log alternative filtered by author and start date.
What happens when results are unknown?
The draft marks missing outcomes with visible gaps and ends with prioritized questions instead of inventing metrics.
Can it include mentoring and incident work?
Yes. It asks for user notes about mentoring, incidents, reviews, and other contributions that Git history may not capture.
Will it search only the repositories I name?
The prose requires that boundary, but the example command lacks repository filters. Add explicit filters before running it.
What formats can it produce?
It produces Markdown and offers to adapt the final document into a self-review, promotion packet outline, or resume bullets.

Détails du développeur

Auteur

agentkitco

Licence

MIT

Version de l’auteur

v1.0

Révision Skillstore

r1

Avis de version

La version déclarée par l’auteur n’est pas un SemVer valide.

Réf

18efac79a818d7e997295839638fdd21906cfd1c

Récence de maintenance

22/10/2026

Utilisation

5 téléchargements · 1 vues

Structure de fichiers

đź“„ SKILL.md

Autres compétences de agentkitco

Tout afficher
Tout afficher