監査履歴

All 15 static findings are false positives caused by Markdown formatting, reference tables, or catalog descriptions. The reviewed files contain no executable scripts, command invocation, archive extraction, network reconnaissance, or prompt injection.

Les 15 constatations statiques sont toutes des faux positifs causés par le formatage Markdown, des tableaux de référence ou des descriptions de catalogue. Les fichiers examinés ne contiennent aucun script exécutable, appel de commande, extraction d’archive, reconnaissance réseau ni injection de prompt.

Most static findings are false positives caused by Markdown code fences, inline code formatting, and reference tables. The only confirmed risk is low-severity marketplace content that points users toward anti-bot bypass and blocked-site scraping workflows.

Most static findings are documentation-only false positives, including archive tool names, worker_threads references, and Markdown backticks. I confirmed the anti-bot and blocked-site recommendations as low-severity dual-use guidance because they may encourage bypassing access controls.

Most static findings are false positives caused by Markdown code fences, inline code formatting, and reference tables. The only confirmed risk is low-severity marketplace content that points users toward anti-bot bypass and blocked-site scraping workflows.

Most static findings are false positives from Markdown references, catalog entries, and code-fence markers. The anti-bot bypass and blocked-site access entries are confirmed low-risk content issues because they can guide evasion of site controls. No evidence found for prompt injection or hidden data exfiltration intent.

Static analysis produced a high raw score because it treated markdown code spans and catalog prose as executable patterns. Manual review found documentation-only content with no scripts, credential access, outbound network endpoint, prompt injection, or malicious intent. The only retained concern is generic shell and package-install guidance that users should review before running.

AI analysis failed after multiple attempts - MANUAL REVIEW REQUIRED before publishing. This skill cannot be auto-published until reviewed by a human.

AI analysis failed after multiple attempts - MANUAL REVIEW REQUIRED before publishing. This skill cannot be auto-published until reviewed by a human.

This is a pure prompt-based skill containing only markdown documentation. No executable code, no network calls, no file access beyond allowed Read/Glob tools, no external commands, and no environment variable access. The skill provides recommendations for when to use agents vs skills.