Historial de auditorías

I reviewed all static findings in context. They are documentation excerpts or Markdown examples, not executable skill behavior. No prompt injection, credential access, exfiltration intent, or hidden installation behavior was found.

I reviewed all static findings in context. They are documentation excerpts or Markdown examples, not executable skill behavior. No prompt injection, credential access, exfiltration intent, or hidden installation behavior was found.

Static analysis reported many high-risk patterns, but review found they are Markdown documentation snippets and official Google example URLs, not executable skill code. No prompt injection attempt, credential exfiltration, hidden downloader, or malicious command runner was found. Residual risk is low because some examples mention local tunnels, HTTP tools, fetch, and innerHTML, so users should treat generated implementation advice as guidance to review.

Static analysis reported many high-risk patterns, but review found they are Markdown documentation snippets and official Google example URLs, not executable skill code. No prompt injection attempt, credential exfiltration, hidden downloader, or malicious command runner was found. Residual risk is low because some examples mention local tunnels, HTTP tools, fetch, and innerHTML, so users should treat generated implementation advice as guidance to review.

This skill consists entirely of markdown documentation files containing SEO guidance from Google's official documentation. All static scanner findings are false positives: (1) 'Weak cryptographic algorithm' alerts are triggered by JSON-LD schema.org examples in documentation; (2) 'Ruby/shell backtick execution' alerts are triggered by markdown code block formatting; (3) 'Hardcoded URL' alerts are legitimate Google documentation URLs. No executable code or security risks present.