Habilidades sent-routing-strategist

📦

sent-routing-strategist

Name: sent-routing-strategist
Author: sentdm

Revisión del contenido r1 Seguro ⚙️ Comandos externos

Plan Sent Message Routing

Incorrect channel choices can cause duplicate deliveries, extra charges, failed fallback, and unsafe retries. This skill explains routing decisions and diagnoses outcomes from Sent evidence.

Compatible con: Claude Codex Code(CC)

📊 74 Adecuado

Maintain this Skill? Claim it 📊 74 Adecuado

Instalar con mi Agente

Copia esta solicitud en tu Agente. Incluye la página canónica del Skill y el manifiesto.

Solicitud de agente

Review the Skillstore skill "sent-routing-strategist" from https://skillstore.io/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Tu Agente debe seguir mostrando su plan y solicitar cualquier confirmación exigida por la política de seguridad.

Recursos legibles por agentes

Usa estos enlaces cuando un agente de IA, crawler o script necesite contexto limpio en vez de leer la página completa.

Detalle Markdown GET /skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist.md Manifest firmado GET /api/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/manifest Lockfile firmado GET /api/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/lockfile

Pruébalo

Usando "sent-routing-strategist". We want WhatsApp first and SMS only if WhatsApp fails. Should we send both channel values?

Resultado esperado:

Use automatic routing by omitting the channel field or selecting Sent automatic routing. Supplying both channels creates two independent messages per recipient.

Usando "sent-routing-strategist". A message shows FAILED on WhatsApp, then newer queued and delivered events on SMS.

Resultado esperado:

The WhatsApp route failed and automatic routing reused the same message identifier.
The newer SMS delivery is the current logical outcome.
Project state by event time and keep each route attempt in the activity history.

Usando "sent-routing-strategist". A campaign has 1,000 recipients and two channel values.

Resultado esperado:

The request creates 2,000 messages and potentially 2,000 charges. Confirm simultaneous delivery is intentional before sending.

Auditoría de seguridad

Seguro

v1 • 2/9/2026 Abrir el informe versionado

All 33 static findings are false positives caused by Markdown code spans or ordinary product troubleshooting guidance. The skill contains no executable commands, system reconnaissance, prompt injection, or other semantic security concerns.

Archivos escaneados

312

Líneas analizadas

Elementos de revisión

Falsos positivos ignorados

Factores de riesgo

La auditoría estática y semántica completada más reciente no detectó hallazgos de seguridad confirmados. Esto no demuestra que el skill no tenga efectos secundarios.

Auditado por: codex

Compartir y citar este informe

Comparte el informe de evaluación versionado, la insignia neutral, la tarjeta insertable y las citas. Skillstore presenta evidencias sin decidir si este Skill es seguro.

Abrir el informe versionado

Copiar enlace del informe

https://skillstore.io/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Insignia Markdown

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

Insignia HTML

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Tarjeta para insertar

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

Citas académicas (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

Cita APA

sentdm. (2026). sent-routing-strategist security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/audits/1

Cita BibTeX

@techreport{sentdm-sentdm-sent-routing-strategist-2026,
  author = {sentdm},
  title = {sent-routing-strategist security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "sent-routing-strategist security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "sentdm"
date-released: "2026-09-02"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/sentdm-sent-routing-strategist/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:sentdm-sent-routing-strategist:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Puntuación de Skillstore

Por qué esta puntuación Confianza de la evidencia: Medio

Arquitectura

Mantenibilidad

Contenido

Comunidad

Cumplimiento de la especificación

Lo que puedes crear

Choose a routing mode

Select automatic routing, a pinned channel, or a deliberate broadcast before implementing a send.

Diagnose delivery outcomes

Use message status, channel, activities, and webhook history to explain unexpected routing behavior.

Review campaign cost

Calculate message volume and charges before approving a multi-recipient or multi-channel campaign.

Prueba estos prompts

Select a channel mode

I need to send [message type] to [audience]. Explain whether I should omit channel, use automatic routing, pin one channel, or broadcast.

Explain an unexpected outcome

My message ended with status [status] and channel [channel]. Explain the likely causes, evidence to inspect, and whether I should retry.

Trace a reroute

Review this ordered activity and webhook history: [events]. Reconstruct each route attempt and identify the current logical message state.

Audit a routing design

Evaluate this routing plan: [plan]. Check broadcast multiplication, channel constraints, fallback assumptions, retry rules, consent, status projection, and expected charges.

Mejores prácticas

Prefer automatic routing unless compliance, contracts, or content require one channel.
Use activity history and current message state before classifying a failure as final.
Calculate recipients multiplied by channels before approving a multi-channel request.