Habilidades delight Historial de auditorías
📦

Historial de auditorías

delight - 4 auditorías

Comparación de versiones

Cambios de capacidades y hallazgos entre versiones auditadas, primero las más recientes.

VersiónFechaResultadoElementos de revisiónCambio vs anterior
v4 Más reciente6 jul 2026, 20:10 Sin hallazgos confirmados0Sin cambios de capacidad
v3 6 jul 2026, 20:10 Sin hallazgos confirmados0Comandos externos
v2 30 jun 2026, 11:14 2 confirmado0Sin cambios de capacidad
v1 16 mar 2026, 08:32 Sin hallazgos confirmados0Base

6 jul 2026, 20:10

All eleven static findings are false positives caused by markdown code fences and ordinary design copy in SKILL.md. The CSS examples, copy examples, and checklist text do not execute commands, inspect the system, or request sensitive data. No semantic security issues or prompt injection attempts were found.

1
Archivos escaneados
307
Líneas analizadas
1
Elementos de revisión
0
Falsos positivos ignorados
Auditado por: codex

6 jul 2026, 20:10

All eleven static findings are false positives caused by markdown code fences and ordinary design copy in SKILL.md. The CSS examples, copy examples, and checklist text do not execute commands, inspect the system, or request sensitive data. No semantic security issues or prompt injection attempts were found.

1
Archivos escaneados
307
Líneas analizadas
1
Elementos de revisión
0
Falsos positivos ignorados
Auditado por: codex

30 jun 2026, 11:14

Static analysis reported external command, weak cryptography, and reconnaissance indicators, but review found only Markdown examples and design guidance in SKILL.md. No executable shell code, cryptographic implementation, system probing, network access, credential handling, or prompt injection attempt was found.

1
Archivos escaneados
307
Líneas analizadas
2
Elementos de revisión
0
Falsos positivos ignorados

Preocupaciones de seguridad confirmadas (2)

Bajo
Static External Command Matches Are Fenced Examples
The flagged locations are Markdown code fences, CSS snippets, and quoted UI copy examples. They do not execute Ruby, shell commands, or any external process.
The reviewed lines are fenced Markdown examples or literal product copy. There is no interpreter directive, command runner, subprocess call, or data flow from user input.
Bajo
Static Keyword Matches Are Descriptive Text
The weak cryptography and reconnaissance hits are false positives from normal prose, headings, and interface guidance. No cryptographic API, hash function, scan command, or host inspection behavior appears at these locations.
The surrounding context is UX guidance about delight, sound design, validation, and loading copy. No evidence of cryptography, system reconnaissance, or malicious intent was found.
Auditado por: codex

16 mar 2026, 08:32

All static analysis findings are false positives. The file contains CSS code examples and copy writing guidance for UI design, not executable code. Backticks in the file denote markdown code blocks for CSS and text examples, not shell command execution. No cryptographic functions, system calls, or network operations are present. This is a design guideline document safe for publication.

1
Archivos escaneados
307
Líneas analizadas
0
Elementos de revisión
0
Falsos positivos ignorados
No se registraron hallazgos de seguridad confirmados en esta auditoría completada.
Auditado por: claude