Historial de auditorías

Most static findings are false positives caused by Markdown inline code, layout wording, HTML comments, and keyboard event handling. Two low-risk network dependencies are confirmed because generated decks may fetch Chart.js or background images from public CDNs. No prompt injection text was found in the reviewed files.

Most static findings are false positives caused by Markdown inline code, layout wording, HTML comments, and keyboard event handling. Two low-risk network dependencies are confirmed because generated decks may fetch Chart.js or background images from public CDNs. No prompt injection text was found in the reviewed files.

Static analysis reported critical and high-risk patterns, but semantic review found no malicious intent or prompt injection. Most severe hits are false positives from markdown examples, copywriting formula names, JavaScript key handling, and an HTML comment. Residual low risk comes from optional local shell command examples, inline presentation scripts, and third-party resource URLs.

The skill consists of documentation and reference files for creating HTML presentations. The static analyzer flagged 121 patterns, but all are false positives. 'Weak cryptographic algorithm' warnings match on CSS keywords like 'key' and 'signature' used in presentation contexts. 'Ruby/shell backtick execution' warnings match on markdown code formatting. Network references point to legitimate CDNs (cdn.jsdelivr.net for Chart.js, images.pexels.com for stock images). No executable scripts or malicious code patterns were found.

Skill is a documentation/template-only skill for creating HTML presentations. Static analyzer flagged markdown code examples as suspicious, but evaluation confirms all findings are false positives. Backticks are used for code formatting in shell command examples, not actual execution. The Chart.js CDN URL is legitimate. No executable code that poses security risk was found.