humanity-and-humanness
Improve AI Communication With Human Readers
AI responses can miss how people read, express preferences, and interpret context. This skill guides clearer structure, concrete drafts, and feedback that preserves user decisions.
Instalar con mi Agente
Copia esta solicitud en tu Agente. Incluye la página canónica del Skill y el manifiesto.
Review the Skillstore skill "humanity-and-humanness" from https://skillstore.io/skills/masseater-humanity-and-humanness.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/masseater-humanity-and-humanness/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Tu Agente debe seguir mostrando su plan y solicitar cualquier confirmación exigida por la política de seguridad.
Recursos legibles por agentes
Usa estos enlaces cuando un agente de IA, crawler o script necesite contexto limpio en vez de leer la página completa.
Pruébalo
Usando "humanity-and-humanness". Improve this update: We changed the schedule and scope, so review everything and tell us what you think.
Resultado esperado:
- Schedule: The delivery date has changed. State the previous and proposed dates.
- Scope: List the included and excluded work separately.
- Decision needed: Ask whether the proposed date or the reduced scope should take priority.
Usando "humanity-and-humanness". A reviewer says one instruction assumes too much context. How should I respond?
Resultado esperado:
- Possible concern: The instruction depends on information that the reader has not received.
- Review other instructions for the same assumption and propose explicit context where needed.
- Show the reviewer a revised example and ask whether it addresses the concern.
Usando "humanity-and-humanness". Help me choose a workshop format when I cannot yet describe my preferences.
Resultado esperado:
- Draft: Begin with a short demonstration, follow with guided practice, and finish with discussion.
- Assumption: Participants need practical experience more than broad coverage.
- Decision for you: Is practical experience the main objective, or should the workshop prioritize an overview?
Auditoría de seguridad
SeguroBoth static findings are false positives: the URL is a reference citation, and the entropy alert concerns readable Japanese prose. No evidence found of malicious instructions, executable payloads, or data exfiltration in SKILL.md. The cited benchmark claims were not independently verified.
Factores de riesgo
🌐 Acceso a red (1)
Compartir y citar este informe
Comparte el informe de evaluación versionado, la insignia neutral, la tarjeta insertable y las citas. Skillstore presenta evidencias sin decidir si este Skill es seguro.
Copiar enlace del informe
https://skillstore.io/skills/masseater-humanity-and-humanness/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportInsignia Markdown
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/masseater-humanity-and-humanness?utm_source=security_passport_badge)Insignia HTML
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/masseater-humanity-and-humanness?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/masseater-humanity-and-humanness/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Tarjeta para insertar
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/masseater-humanity-and-humanness.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Citas académicas (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
Cita APA
masseater. (2026). humanity-and-humanness security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/masseater-humanity-and-humanness/audits/1Cita BibTeX
@techreport{masseater-masseater-humanity-and-humanness-2026,
author = {masseater},
title = {humanity-and-humanness security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/masseater-humanity-and-humanness/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "humanity-and-humanness security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "masseater"
date-released: "2026-10-24"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/masseater-humanity-and-humanness/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:masseater-humanity-and-humanness:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Puntuación de Skillstore
Por qué esta puntuación Confianza de la evidencia: MedioLo que puedes crear
Clarify team documentation
Review a team update for hidden assumptions, crowded sentences, and decisions that readers may overlook.
Elicit product preferences
Present a concrete proposal so stakeholders can respond to specific choices while retaining control over project objectives.
Apply feedback consistently
Explore why a reviewer rejected one instruction and identify other passages affected by the same concern.
Prueba estos prompts
Review this message for human readers: [message]. Separate independent judgments and add headings or examples where helpful. Preserve the meaning.
Draft a proposal for [goal] using [constraints]. Identify assumptions and decisions that change my objective. Ask for feedback on those decisions.
Review [document] alongside this feedback: [comment]. Suggest the underlying concern and other affected passages. Distinguish evidence from assumptions and request clarification where needed.
Review [workflow] for readability, implicit context, and user decision ownership. Propose a concrete revision. Separate routine choices from objective-changing decisions and identify questions requiring confirmation.
Mejores prácticas
- Provide the audience, objective, and a concrete draft before requesting revisions.
- Confirm inferred intentions with the user before changing decisions that affect their objective.
- Check whether feedback reveals a concern that applies elsewhere in the document.
Evitar
- Treating general statements about human reading as universal facts about every reader.
- Asking only abstract questions when a concrete proposal would help users express preferences.
- Changing user objectives based on inferred context without confirmation.