Habilidades interface-review

📦

interface-review

Name: interface-review
Author: jakubkrehel

Revisión del contenido r1 Seguro ⚙️ Comandos externos📁 Acceso al sistema de archivos

Review Interface Changes with Clear Evidence

Interface changes can introduce visual, accessibility, and content regressions across connected surfaces. This skill resolves the change scope and produces evidence-based findings with clear status labels.

Compatible con: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 77 Bronce

Instalar con mi Agente

Copia esta solicitud en tu Agente. Incluye la página canónica del Skill y el manifiesto.

Solicitud de agente

Review the Skillstore skill "interface-review" from https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Tu Agente debe seguir mostrando su plan y solicitar cualquier confirmación exigida por la política de seguridad.

Recursos legibles por agentes

Usa estos enlaces cuando un agente de IA, crawler o script necesite contexto limpio en vez de leer la página completa.

Detalle Markdown GET /skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review.md Manifest firmado GET /api/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/manifest Lockfile firmado GET /api/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/lockfile

Pruébalo

Usando "interface-review". Review the current branch and include uncommitted interface changes.

Resultado esperado:

Scope: seven commits and two uncommitted files against the default branch.
Coverage: twelve files after exclusions, with two affected surfaces reviewed.
Finding: a dialog lost its accessible name in this change. Status: Regression. Severity: High.
Verdict: Block until the accessible name is restored.

Usando "interface-review". Review pull request 482 for interface issues.

Resultado esperado:

Scope: the fetched pull request head compared with its merge base.
Coverage: no interface evidence was found in excluded generated files.
No actionable interface findings were introduced or regressed.
Verdict: Approve.

Auditoría de seguridad

Seguro

v1 • 4/9/2026 Abrir el informe versionado

All 44 static findings are false positives. The external-command alerts mistake Markdown formatting and examples for Ruby execution; the other alerts describe bounded review scope or isolated worktree use. No evidence of prompt injection, exfiltration intent, destructive behavior, or other semantic security issues was found.

Archivos escaneados

289

Líneas analizadas

Elementos de revisión

Falsos positivos ignorados

Factores de riesgo

La auditoría estática y semántica completada más reciente no detectó hallazgos de seguridad confirmados. Esto no demuestra que el skill no tenga efectos secundarios.

Auditado por: codex

Compartir y citar este informe

Comparte el informe de evaluación versionado, la insignia neutral, la tarjeta insertable y las citas. Skillstore presenta evidencias sin decidir si este Skill es seguro.

Abrir el informe versionado

Copiar enlace del informe

https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Insignia Markdown

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

Insignia HTML

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Tarjeta para insertar

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

Citas académicas (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

Cita APA

jakubkrehel. (2026). interface-review security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/audits/1

Cita BibTeX

@techreport{jakubkrehel-jakubkrehel-interface-review-2026,
  author = {jakubkrehel},
  title = {interface-review security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "interface-review security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "jakubkrehel"
date-released: "2026-09-04"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:jakubkrehel-interface-review:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Puntuación de Skillstore

Por qué esta puntuación Confianza de la evidencia: Medio

Arquitectura

Mantenibilidad

Contenido

Comunidad

Cumplimiento de la especificación

Lo que puedes crear

Review a feature branch

Check interface changes across the branch and local edits before opening a pull request.

Assess a pull request

Resolve the pull request ref, inspect affected surfaces, and identify interface regressions.

Verify accessibility changes

Inspect removed semantics, focus behavior, labels, and motion preferences within the selected change.

Prueba estos prompts

Review my current changes

Review the current interface changes. Resolve the default scope and report only introduced or regressed interface issues.

Review a pull request

Review pull request 482 for interface regressions. Include the resolved scope, affected surfaces, exclusions, coverage, and status for each finding.

Review an explicit range

Review release..feature as written. Check removed lines, expand affected consumers, and separate introduced, regressed, and pre-existing findings.

Audit a shared design token change

Review this design token change across two consumer hops. Prioritize rendered entry points, explain coverage limits, and verify each claimed regression against the base.

Mejores prácticas

Name the target explicitly when you need a pull request, ref, branch, or range reviewed.
Provide the change intent so missing states and incomplete behavior can be evaluated.
Request rendered verification when findings depend on runtime behavior or visual output.

Evitar

Do not use this skill as a whole-repository audit without routing directly to better-interface.
Do not treat pre-existing issues as failures caused by the current change.
Do not assume runtime or visual behavior was verified when the report marks it unverified.