Habilidades better-interface

📦

better-interface

Name: better-interface
Author: jakubkrehel

Revisión del contenido r1 Seguro ⚙️ Comandos externos

Review Interfaces Across Six Design Disciplines

Separate interface reviews can duplicate issues and obscure the most important fixes. This skill coordinates specialist reviews into one evidence-based report ranked by user impact.

Compatible con: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 77 Bronce

Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 77 Bronce

Instalar con mi Agente

Copia esta solicitud en tu Agente. Incluye la página canónica del Skill y el manifiesto.

Solicitud de agente

Review the Skillstore skill "better-interface" from https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Tu Agente debe seguir mostrando su plan y solicitar cualquier confirmación exigida por la política de seguridad.

Recursos legibles por agentes

Usa estos enlaces cuando un agente de IA, crawler o script necesite contexto limpio en vez de leer la página completa.

Detalle Markdown GET /skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface.md Manifest firmado GET /api/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface/manifest Lockfile firmado GET /api/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface/lockfile

Pruébalo

Usando "better-interface". Illustrative request: review a settings screen where rendered testing confirms the close control has no accessible name.

Resultado esperado:

Scope: settings screen and its close control.
HIGH, Accessibility: the close control has no accessible name. Add a name that describes its action.
Verification: rendered accessibility inspection confirms the missing name.
Verdict: Block until the high-impact finding is resolved; name any unreviewed domains.

Usando "better-interface". Illustrative request: summarize a review with no actionable findings where the writing skill was unavailable.

Resultado esperado:

Coverage: list the files, components, states, and checks inspected for each completed domain.
Writing: Not reviewed because better-writing was unavailable.
Findings: No actionable interface findings.
Verdict: Approve for inspected domains only. Writing was not reviewed.

Auditoría de seguridad

Seguro

v1 • 26/10/2026 Abrir el informe versionado

All 25 static findings are false positives: 24 match Markdown code spans, and one matches prose about consolidating interface findings. No evidence found of malicious command execution, data exfiltration, or prompt injection in the supplied files. The skill requests safe project checks and specialist skill loading; those external implementations are outside this audit.

Archivos escaneados

184

Líneas analizadas

Elementos de revisión

Falsos positivos ignorados

Factores de riesgo

La auditoría estática y semántica completada más reciente no detectó hallazgos de seguridad confirmados. Esto no demuestra que el skill no tenga efectos secundarios.

Auditado por: codex

Compartir y citar este informe

Comparte el informe de evaluación versionado, la insignia neutral, la tarjeta insertable y las citas. Skillstore presenta evidencias sin decidir si este Skill es seguro.

Abrir el informe versionado

Copiar enlace del informe

https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Insignia Markdown

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

Insignia HTML

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Tarjeta para insertar

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

Citas académicas (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

Cita APA

jakubkrehel. (2026). better-interface security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface/audits/1

Cita BibTeX

@techreport{jakubkrehel-jakubkrehel-better-interface-2026,
  author = {jakubkrehel},
  title = {better-interface security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "better-interface security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "jakubkrehel"
date-released: "2026-10-26"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:jakubkrehel-better-interface:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Puntuación de Skillstore

Por qué esta puntuación Confianza de la evidencia: Medio

Arquitectura

Mantenibilidad

Contenido

Comunidad

Cumplimiento de la especificación

Lo que puedes crear

Prioritize frontend fixes

Review a complete application flow and consolidate repeated component issues into actionable fixes ranked by user impact.

Check design consistency

Compare an implemented screen with project conventions across typography, color, layout, writing, and accessibility.

Assess release readiness

Review a critical user journey with explicit coverage, verification results, and a verdict based on remaining high-impact issues.

Prueba estos prompts

Review one screen

Review [screen] with better-interface. Keep the review read-only and return ranked findings, coverage, verification, and a verdict.

Review a complete flow

Review [flow] across all available domains. Include empty, loading, error, and narrow-width states, and state any excluded surfaces.

Investigate shared issues

Review [feature] using our documented design conventions. Consolidate repeated issues against shared tokens or components and prioritize the smallest effective fixes.

Review and implement fixes

Review [flow] and implement the consolidated findings within that scope. Use project-native solutions, rerun relevant checks, and report remaining issues and unverified behavior.

Mejores prácticas

Specify one complete screen or flow and provide the relevant project conventions.
Make specialist skills and a working preview available before requesting broad coverage.
Check the evidence, verification results, and unreviewed domains before relying on an approval.

Evitar

Treating missing specialist skills or unverified checks as proof that a domain passed.
Requesting repository-wide coverage when the available context supports only one complete flow.
Expecting source edits from a review request without explicitly authorizing implementation.

Preguntas frecuentes

Which AI tools are listed as supported?

The marketplace lists Claude, Codex, and Claude Code. Available checks and specialist skill loading depend on the host environment.

Does this package include all six specialist skills?

No. It references better-accessibility, better-layout, better-writing, better-typography, better-colors, and better-ui. Missing domains must be marked Not reviewed.

Will a review change my source files?

No, reviews are read-only by default. Source changes require an explicit implementation request.

Can it review a pull request directly?

It directs change-scoped requests to interface-review, which the user must invoke. It can consolidate a review handed back by that skill.

What does an Approve verdict mean?

No HIGH findings remain within inspected domains. MEDIUM and LOW findings may remain, and unreviewed domains must be named.

Does it guarantee accessibility compliance?

No. Results depend on specialist rules, inspected evidence, and available verification. Unavailable checks and unreviewed domains must be disclosed.